Thursday, October 7, 2010

Bad Calls In Baseball

The replay discussion in baseball has grown so ubiquitous, so overbearing, so boring that -- like the revenue/payroll disparity in baseball -- it's simply no fun to talk about anymore. Everybody knows about the problem. The problem never seems to get fixed. After a while, the talk feels as pointless as complaining about the humidity in St. Louis in July.

But, as boring as it is, Thursday was a banner day in baseball's grand losing battle to umpiring legitimacy. In the Tampa Bay-Texas game, the umpires seemed to miss a checked-swing third strike call against Michael Young. Given a reprieve, Young homered, and soon after Tampa Bay manager Joe Maddon was tossed, and the Rays lost.

In the Minnesota-New York game, the home plate umpire seemed to miss a strike three call against Lance Berkman.* The next pitch, Berkman crushed a double that gave the Yankees the lead they would never relinquish. Soon after, Minnesota manager Ron Gardenhire was tossed.

*Though Yankees fans and others will point out that the umpire probably missed a call on the second pitch of that same at-bat, calling a strike on a pitch that was probably at least a couple of inches outside.

And in the Atlanta-San Francisco game, the second-base umpire seemed to miss a clear tag on Buster Posey on a stolen base attempt. The umpire wasn't the only one to miss it ... the television announcers did not mention it even though they showed several replays (they seemed more interested in the quirks of Posey's awkward slide -- they picked up on it a few innings later) and Bobby Cox, who has never been shy about coming out of the dugout, stayed put. There wasn't even an argument on this one, though Posey was clearly out. Soon after, Posey scored the only run of the game.

A banner day, yes. Of course, this came a day after the umpires clearly missed a catch/trap call that should have ended the Twins-Yankees game, and the umpires missed a hit-by-pitch against Carlos Pena in the Rays-Rangers game. There were probably other misses, but those were the lowlights.

I don't want to sound like Chicken Little here, but I think baseball has a real problem on its hands ... a very serious problem. And it goes beyond all the replay talk. I don't want this to sound too monumental or anything, but, what the heck, you can read this next sentence in your John Facenda voice: Baseball is facing a serious legitimacy issue. Anyway, I think so.

It's a different kind of legitimacy issue from the gambling problems of the 1910s or the shameful color barrier before Jackie Robinson or even the steroid issue. It's different ... but it's still dangerous for the game.

Legitimacy for a sports league simply means this: People have to believe in the fairness and authenticity of the sport. This is why the BCS is so unpopular -- nobody believes in its legitimacy. The NHL and NBA regular seasons have legitimacy issues because so many teams make the playoffs. The Tour de France has legitimacy issues because, as we have only recently learned, contaminated meat is causing positive drug tests. Golf tournaments without Tiger Woods over the last few years have had legitimacy issues because Woods was so much better than anyone else. NASCAR had legitimacy issues when nobody really understood their scoring system. And so on.

I have no idea if baseball umpires are worse these days than they used to be ... I suspect they're probably not worse. I suspect they're probably better. But that doesn't matter. Times have changed. Technology has changed. Every game is on television somewhere. Every television game has multiple angles. You could be a brutal umpire in the days of Casey, and all people could really do was yell "Kill the umpire!" They had no replays to use as proof. Now, these days, there are so many hours to fill on sports channels, and there is infinite space on the Internet, and people are killing the umpires on Twitter night after night after night. And they have pictures to back them up.

And this is the point -- it doesn't matter how good umpires were before all these new technologies, just like it doesn't matter anymore if you have the fastest horse and buggy in the county. We SEE the missed calls now. And those missed calls are embarrassing the game. More, they are making the results of these games questionable. Why was gambling an issue? Because it made the results questionable. Why were steroids an issue? Because they made the results questionable. And here we are in 2010, and umpires are missing hugely important calls, loads of them, and games are being influenced by these blown calls, and baseball folks are just standing by and saying that the human element is part of the game? No, that's can't last.

See, sooner or later, people aren't going to stand for it. I suspect some people already are just shaking their heads in frustration. The more bad calls, the more people are going to turn off to baseball. The more times a fan's team gets cheated, the more likely he or she is to simply stop caring. "Bad calls are a part of baseball," might be a good enough answer for some traditionalists, but there aren't enough traditionalists to keep ANY game popular and vibrant. You really can't have playoff games, World Series games, perfect games sullied, ruined, altered by terrible umpire calls while baseball gurus just sit back like the wrestling referee who doesn't happen to notice that one guy brought a metal chair into the ring.*

*Even as I write this now, they are showing the blown stolen base call over and over and over on TBS -- five or six times in a row. Baseball can't have this.

What can be done? Well, yeah, we probably have to delve back for a moment into that tiresome talk about replay. There are numerous problems with replay in baseball. Nobody wants the pace of the game slowed even more. Nobody wants more of those life-draining delays while umpires gather together to talk. Nobody wants baseball to turn into a conditional sport, where you have to wait for the appeal before unleashing your cheer. And frankly there are some calls -- like ball and strike calls -- that probably do not fit replay as we have it now. The Berkman call, frustrating as it may have been for Twins fans, is probably not reversible yet, not until ball-strike technology gets better.

But to me it's a simple reality: You just can't have these missed calls and maintain your authenticity. You just can't. Not over time. And replay seems the most viable answer.* So if baseball has to give up some time and a bit of tradition to get the calls right, then I think sooner or later -- sooner -- they will have to do that.

*It may not be the only answer, though. I was talking to a baseball insider who says that baseball could fix a lot of these problems by rethinking how umpires do their job. He thinks umpires could work together better as a team (could the third base umpire have helped out on that Buster Posey stolen base), he thinks they could be positioned better, he thinks they could be trained better. I'm skeptical ... but I'm also for any answer that will get us the right calls much more often.

Here's what I do know: While some people talked about Tim Lincecum's remarkable pitching performance after the Giants game, I kept thinking that Posey was out. While some people were talking about the shocking Rangers upset of the Rays, I kept wondering if the Rays might have come back in that game had the umpire called Michael Young out on that check swing. While people talked about the Yankees dominance and the Twins having lost 11 playoff games in a row, I kept wondering if the game might have been a little different had the umpire rung up Berkman.

What-ifs are great for sports. They're not great when the umpires are the ones sparking the what-ifs. Twenty-five years later people in St. Louis STILL blame umpire Don Denkinger for the Cardinals loss to Kansas City in the 1985 World Series. That's a part of baseball history. Now, because of better technology, more replay angles, we're getting multiple-Denkinger moments ever single day. Sooner or later, people will have enough. There were a couple of managers and a lot of fans on Thursday who decided they already had enough.

59 comments:

  1. The Big problem is the quality of the technology. We are seeing beautiful multiple angles that we never saw before. If anything the Umpiring is probably better than it has every been, the only difference is that umpires in the past never had to worry about super slo-mo high definition cameras.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Money is also a problem. Only the Yankees could add a guy mid-season with a career .409 on base percentage and a career 145 ops+ making $14 million a year and then play him as a part-time DH.

    The Twins winning the weak A.L. central gives the illusion that the sport is somehow competitive. The Twins can win all the A.L. Central titles they want, they are never getting past the Yankees money machine. The Yankees put up a lineup of HOF's, MVP's, All Stars, Gold Glovers, it's just a joke.

    And now that all the big market teams have learned the keys of success of moneyball, the game is over.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love that when people are having bad years but someone wants to make the point that they're great, they use career numbers. But if someone's having a great year, then they only use those numbers.

    Berkman's not having a good season. He wasn't when the Yankees acquired him. His OBP was still very good, but not .400+ (the OBP being the reason the Yankees traded a solid relief prospect, albeit an expendable one), but the power was not there and he was hitting horribly against lefties. And keep in mind, he became a "part time DH" because he got HURT. While he was hurt, Marcus Thames absolutely killed the ball and considering Berkman had been struggling, there was no reasonable way to sit Thames against lefties (who Berkman hadn't hit all year). And it's not like they paid the whole salary for the full year. In fact the Rays, who are openly cutting payroll next year, had no problem trying to get him too. But I guess we'll ignore that to bash the Yankees, who might not even have the best team in baseball (but do we bash the Phillies for their strong lineup and the fact that they've got 3 aces, two of whom came over in trades? Nah, guess not).

    Yes, the Yankees have a lot of money and obviously, it helps, but let's not act like they've dominated the whole past decade. They made the playoffs nearly every year but only won in 2009 (and 2000 if you want to count that). Other teams managed to beat the Yankees. The issue with the Twins is that the Yankees are a terrible matchup for them, the way I see it. The Yankees have a very strong lineup that works pitchers to death...it as BUILT that way. And before you complain more about buying players, the guy who had the highest OBP and saw the most pitches per at bat is Brett Gardner, making league minimum and brought up through the Yankee farm system. And if you look at that lineup, the Yankees have only two high priced free agent signings in Alex Rodriguez and Mark Teixeira. They've got 3 guys that came over in trades (Berkman, Swisher, and Granderson). One is a 2 month rental, one was practically given away by the White Sox, and one was made available in a trade where decent prospects were given. Neither Swisher nor Granderson are making so much money that only the Yankees could have possibly gotten them...don't blame Brian Cashman for accurately realizing Swisher was coming off a career worst year and for taking a chance on Granderson coming off a career worst year (he didn't improve on his overall numbers but was improving at the end of the season, including against lefties). Cano was from the farm. Round that out with Jeter, Posada, and Thames. Thames was a shot in the dark that worked out, Posada and Jeter came up through the farm and the Yankees were willing to spend to keep them.

    It's funny how the Twins are universally praised for keeping Mauer (and I agree with it), but the Yankees are villified for daring to keep Jeter and Mariano (two of the three sure thing Hall of Famers on the Yankees).

    If the "game is over" then why did the Rays make the World Series in 08? Why did they win the division this year? Why did a wide variety of teams make the postseason and even win the World Series from 2001-2009, with only the Red Sox repeating as WS champs?

    Do the Yankees have an advantage, YES. They play by the rules of the game, though. But it's a total overreaction to say the "game is over".

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, eventually the solution will be technology, won't it? Some system like what's used in tennis (where a loud "beep" announces that a serve has hit the net) could surely be developed for calling balls and strikes. There's no reason why calling balls and strikes should be left open to the possibility of human error, and if the concern is how long games would be delayed if replay were allowed more frequently, then eliminating the initial "play" of the umpire on balls and strikes might be the best solution. You could keep the umpires as more than figureheads by giving them responsibility for making calls on baserunning and batted balls (with clearly defined rules for using replays on disputed calls). But there just isn't anything in baseball that's analogous to offensive/defensive pass interference or charging/blocking, where even a replay frequently can't establish what the correct call should have been.* My suspicion (and hope) is that it won't be too long before the "human element" that technophobes long to preserve will be seen in the same way that RBI's are gradually coming to be understood: as a quaint relic that we can and should discard.

    *The best counter to this is the exception that proves the rule - while it's true that deciding whether a "checked swing" should be called a strike seems at times to be impossible, that's only because from the perspective of the rules, there's no such thing as a "checked swing," and certainly no rules about how to decide when a swing is really a swing. So the problem here is with the rules, and not with how the rules are enforced. Or, more accurately, the problem is that no umpire seems willing to enforce the rule on strikes literally, which would require that any motion of a bat towards a pitched ball be seen as an attempt to hit the ball.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kind of a neat stat I just saw that pretty much sums up the Yankee offense...the Twins have scored first in the last 8 playoff games they've played against the Yankees. The Yankees are 8-0 in those games.

    Just shows the MO of the Yankee hitters. Typically they don't score early, but they do wear out the opposing pitcher to the point where they either figure him out, get to him when he's tired, or crush the middle relief.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Braves could have batted on for 18 innings last night and not scored a run - they would have lost eventually, stolen base or no stolen base. (And I say that as a Braves fan.) So I didn't feel like there was any lack of legitimacy in that particular result, although your overall point still stands...

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Nobody wants the pace of the game slowed even more."

    I have great difficulty with this phrase. Using replays, would, in my opinionated opinion, speed up the game. For starters, it would keep ranting and raving managers off the field.

    The main stumbling block seems to be the umpires and their precious attitude that they, and only they, by virtue of being on-field, are able to adjudicate. Instead of putting two extra umpires down the baselines in the playoffs, the powers that be could have tried putting the extra guys in a booth somewhere and organised a communications system.

    Maybe if baseball's administrators stopped thinking theirs was the only game on the planet and took a look at how other sports – uh, cricket maybe – handled contentious calls then some progress could be made.

    And I'm wondering if these umpires and their bosses ever go to the races, back a horse in a tight finish and say, "Gee, why do we have to wait for the photofinish? Just have the damn judge make his call and we'll be happy with that."

    ReplyDelete
  8. Interestingly, although the TBS announcers missed the call on the stolen base, I was listening to the Giants announcers on KNBR and they got it immediately.

    ReplyDelete
  9. MLB's biggest failures during the last two decades all seem to stem from its leadership waiting for an issue to become a problem, then they react slowly and deliberately to address the problem. We've seen this before with performance enhancing drugs, maple bats, the Coors Field humidor (MLB should never allow game-ready yet-to-be-put-into-play baseballs to be handled by anyone other than the umpires during a game at ANY stadium),(insert any number of other problems here), and now we're seeing it again with still more botched playoff calls prompting a push for increased use of replay reviews.

    In short, MLB needs a leadership that takes proactive measures at the first inkling of a future problem and intitiates steps to eradicate, or at least limit the proliferation, of the problem. Instead what we get is a leadership that consistently opts for what the owners want (above all other concerns), what the network broadcasters want (as a secondary concern), what the players want (as a tertiary concern), what the collective bargaining agreement allows for, etc., rather than what would be best for the sport itself. And things simply will never change until an independent commissioner (a person who is neither an owner, front office exec, or former player) is appointed and granted the full unadulterated authority to make decisions independent of the owners and players and any other influences. And yes, you're right that the current MLB leadership (the 30 owners and the former owner who acts as the game's surrogate commissioner from afar) will never stand for such nonsense, as you see they sort of like being able to call all the shots. Those problems with the game that we as serious baseball fans care deeply about simply aren't important to the owners that run the game because addressing those problems costs the sport money and doesn't generate a lick of revenue for them as individuals.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Baseball games are already too long. My enjoyment of college and pro football has been serious diminished by the endless, lengthy, momentum-draining replay delays. I'd rather see the wrong call than wait through five minutes of a zebra staring at a video screen. Hell, at least once a week or so, the refs overturn calls where the evidence is not, in fact, conclusive.

    Why didn't baseball have a legitimacy problem 25 years ago? The outcome of an entire WORLD SERIES was changed by a blown call and we all went on with our lives (yes, Royals fans, I know it wasn't the third out, blah, blah, blah). I have yet to meet a Kansas City native over 35 who feels even a twinge of ambivalence about that World Championship banner flying over Kauffman Stadium. Nor should they; breaks of the game and all that.

    All of this is just media-driven groupthink. For fifty or more years, we had "mythical" national football championships and only the geekiest of the geeks complained. When Brigham Young won the title in 1984, we all knew it was bogus (they beat up on a bunch of San Diego States and beat a 6-6 Michigan team in an early December second-tier bowl game). We got over it.

    But now, thanks to the proliferation of 24/7 sports talk and sports blogging and sports TV, even members of Congress are wasting our time and money debating the BCS. Hey, Auburn: you want to fly a 2003 National Championship banner over Whatchucallit Staium, knock yourselves out. It's just sports.

    It's supposed to entertainment, not science. And waiting several boring minutes for a bunch of guys to huddle in a replay booth to (maybe) get a call right is not entertaining. It is boring.

    Play the damn game.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The problem I have with umpiring is that there is no transparent accountability. Players are sent to the minors if they do a poor job and have to talk to the press after a game. We hear that there is a rating system for umpires, but no one, not the players, managers, or fans, ever learns about discipline or how well individual umpires are doing. Have umpires been let go? Do umpires get demoted? Are there guys in Triple A who could do better?

    The player's union is asking for a meeting after the season with the umpires to try to work things out. I don't if that is a good idea, but I'm sure both players and managers get pissed when they are thrown out of games after arguing calls that the umpire obviously blew. Like anonymous Matt said above, this is really an issue the commissioner and the league presidents need to handle. If not replay, give us some information on what is being done to protect the integrity of the sport when it come to umpiring.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Did you hear the Rays' fan chant, "Replay...replay...replay" It was great and sent as loud a message as any of Mr. Posnanski's great posts. Clearly, the fans are fed up. I spend half the game yelling at the television because of the strike zone. Home plate umpires should only call balls fair and foul and call plays at the plate, keep the pace of the game going and replace dirty balls with fresh ones. PitchF/X should call the game. Replay is a no-brainer and it's way overdue.

    And Kyle is right about one thing: How come the Phillies get a pass on "buying their success?"

    ReplyDelete
  13. What's killing baseball is in evidence this year. Not bad calls, but the fact that Atlanta playoff games aren't just ending after kids' bedtime, they don't even START before bedtime.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I made this point on a previous post. I feel it still applies. I think everyone would go for replay if it really was 'instant'. Tennis has the best solution - apply it to baseball.

    For those above who say it's "only a game", let's see what happens when the NFL and NBA maybe shut down. A lot of people besides players and owners earna living from pro sports.

    Finally, explain to a non-baseball fan teenager why baseball doesn't have more technology. See if you can win that argument. If you can't then you'll see where baseball is heading if it doesn't change.

    ReplyDelete
  15. To Anonymous ("Why didn't baseball have a legitimacy problem 25 years ago?"): Read Joe's post. He addressed exactly that question. One-word answer: technology.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "altered by terrible umpire calls while baseball gurus just sit back like the wrestling referee who doesn't happen to notice that one guy brought a metal chair into the ring.*"

    It isn't just the good subject matter but classics like that line that keep me reading Joe's stuff.

    Length of games has been compounded by two factors. The time for commercials between innings and the ability of the batter to step out of the box after every pitch and adjust everything including his cup.

    Check out some of the times of WS games from the past. Game 7 of 1960. Pirates 10, Yankees 9. Game time? 2 hours and 36 minutes. Same game. Same amount of innings. Actually a lot of pitching changes in that game.

    I don't think umpiring is worse just more scrutinized now. I think that there should be a set of reviewable plays - in the same style at the NFL and then give each manager two challenges. Lose the challenge and lose an out. Maybe have the ninth inning and extra innings done by the booth.

    Can't just have one review after another because that would make games six hours long. However, some equity needs to be put into play.

    ReplyDelete
  17. @William Tasker

    Partly, I think, it's an order of magnitude. The Yankees' payroll this year on opening day was $206 million (second place was the BoSox at $162 million). The Phillies were fourth at $142 million. If you go down the payroll list that $64 million difference another time, you're down below the #14 Astros. (The $44 million gap between #1 and #2 would get you down to #6, from #2, as well)

    Second, the perception with the Phillies is that their players are mostly home-grown (Howard, Utley, Rollins, Ruiz, Hamels, Kendrick, Madson) and/or low-cost additions (Victorino, Werth, Blanton, Lidge). A good mirror would be the mid-90s Yankees, with their homegrown core (Jeter, Pettitte, Rivera, Williams, Posada) and cheaper, smart acquisitions (O'Neill, Key, Girardi, Brosius).

    The Phillies have now started to enter the "big dog" status phase, trading for big names (Halladay/Oswalt for the Phillies, Tino Martinez/Chuck Knoblauch/Roger Clemens/David Cone for the Yankees) along with some big-ticket free agent signings (Ibanez/Polanco for the Phillies, Wells/El Duque for the Yankees).

    The only real difference being that the Phillies even now haven't entered the top two in payroll... the Yankees have been in the top two every year since their playoff run started in 1995 (and I'm sure they thank Peter Angelos' idiocy every season that they were only #2 in 1998, or else it'd be a 14 year run with the #1 payroll instead of "only" an 11 year run.)

    ReplyDelete
  18. How would better positioning help this situation? In the Golson "trap" the other night, as well as Phil Cuzzi's embarrassing foul ball call on Mauer last year (and Jim Joyce against Galarraga for that matter) the umpire had a perfect angle, was standing ten feet away, and in Cuzzi and Golson's case (don't remember who the umpire was for that one) were only ten feet away because MLB puts an extra umpire down the lines in the playoffs, presumably to make calls precisely like the ones they were perfectly positioned for and missed.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I won't be satisfied until someone comes up with an advanced statistic for umpiring. I really want to read more about FLURG ratings (Fat & Lazy Umpires Ruin Games). In the meantime, yes, please let's whine and moan about every ball and strike call.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I don't mind if people don't want replay...what I can't stand is the BS that gets trotted out: "Oh, it would take too long"..."we'd all be throwing challenge flags all over the field."

    Replay would make games shorter on average because managers would spend less time in faux-arguments with umpires. For an efficient, flag-free replay system, look no further than cricket -- or tennis, for that matter.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Don't want to sound like a homer, because I'm a Yankee fan, but I will anyway. As bad as the Berkman call was, I thought the umpire was off all night. Either that, or TBS's tracking system was off, because there were a lot of questionable calls. I remember 2 back-to-back pitches to Jeter - both in the same place, 1 called a strike, another called a ball. But Pavano was constantly getting the pitch 2-3 inches outside on lefties. I don't think replay can be used on ball/strikes, but there is a way to fix a lot of these calls. Like Joe, I think the umpires are about the same as they've always been. There's just more evidence of the mistakes now. That, and everyone jumps on it and posts it to Twitter, their blog, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  22. This was a very nice way of putting exactly what I've been trying to articulate since the playoffs last season.

    Baseball is becoming a sport based on which team can capitalize on the extra strike or extra out from a bad call by an umpire.

    After seeing the highlight of the missed Young check swing in the Rays/Rangers game I went to a bar to watch my beloved Twins play the Yankees. It took me until about the 8th or 9th inning to actually be upset to the Twins were losing because up until then I was extremely frustrated for Pettitte and Pavano and the ever shifting strike zone they were throwing at.

    Two nights in a row Twins pitchers made what should have been called strike 3 but was called a ball and on the next pitch gave up a hit that gave the Yankees the lead.

    It's frustrating and makes me feel like not watching baseball, my absolute favorite sport, interest, hobby and past time.

    ReplyDelete
  23. @Kyle Litke,

    It's not even a question of payroll, the Yankees earned $440 million dollars in '09, the next closest team (Red Sox) earned $260 million, the Minnesota Twins earned $162 million, The Phillies earned $233 million in '09. The Yankees spend about league average on the payroll, around 46%.

    Read Joe's excellent article on the subject:
    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/joe_posnanski/04/19/baseball.revenue/index.html

    Here's the Forbes list:
    http://www.forbes.com/lists/2010/33/baseball-valuations-10_The-Business-Of-Baseball_Rank.html

    I don't know what's more of a joke, The Yankees huge competitive disparity or the refusal of Yankee fans to admit they have anything other than a slight competitive advantage.

    The Yankees have $700 million dollars in guaranteed contracts on only four players: A-Rod, C.C., Tex, And Burnett. Few teams could afford one of those contracts, 2-4 teams might be able to afford 2 of those contracts, no other team could afford 3 let alone 4 of those contracts.

    They spent $46 million on Kei Igawa and he barely pitched in the big leagues. That move would cripple most teams.

    They're paying Vazquez $11 million dollars and he's not even on the post-season roster.

    They're paying starting pitcher A.J. Burnett $16 million and he's not even on the starting rotation against the Twins. What team has a $16 million dollar middle relief guy?

    They picked up Kerry Wood making $10 million dollars to be their 8th inning set-up guy.

    They picked up Lance Berkman making $14 million dollars (Astros kicked in $5 million) to be their DH. Berkman who's a career 145 ops+ hitter borderline HOF candidate gets to bat 8th!!! in this Yankee Lineup.

    What other team can go out and pick up $19 million in salary for a set-up man and an 8th place hitter???

    ReplyDelete
  24. I can see MLB using replay for every call except balls/strikes right now. The technology is there and does not have to extend play times much at all.

    There might be a way to handle ball/strike calls via technology in the future, but I think we're better off leaving that in the ump's hands for now and accepting that they will not be perfect. Just make sure to weed out umps like Eric Gregg (who had a ridiculously wide strike zone) and I think we can live with the occasional missed ball or strike.

    But the means are there for making sure you get every other call right. I think MLB should use it.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I'm a giants fan, and this I benefited from the posey safe call last night. That being said, I want instant replay. The Giants got jobbed on a call by Phil Cuzzi against the Mets this season - Ishikawa called out; he was safe - that would have literally ended the game. They lost that game. But this is why the lack of replay is frustrating: we're talking about that call, instead of the second absolutely brilliant playoff debut in two days. 14 strikeouts, two hits, 1 walk. 33 swing and miss strikes out of 119 throw (28%).

    ReplyDelete
  26. The biggest problem with trying to instate replay is Bud Selig(yes, I know; it's a tired and overused sentiment, but it doesn't make it any less true). The man can't decide which pair of boxers to wear without forming a committee in order to form a committee to study the situation. I don't see how he, and the rest of the MLB hierarchy can continue to sit there and say there's not a problem. Just get it done.

    ReplyDelete
  27. @JQuemere hits it right on the head. Where the real advantage comes in is the Yankees (and to a lesser extent the Red Sox) have the ability to buy their way out of any mistakes they make in contracts. Sign a guy for 4 yrs & $60M and he's a bust? no problem. If the Twins do that, they're damaged for years. 5 or 6 guys on the Yankee payroll equals the Twins payroll, and the Twins spent $100M this year.

    Of course, their $10M+ elite closer was hurt all year (dead money), and their $12M+ MVP 1B has been out since mid-season. They burned prospects and money on replacing the closer, leaving nothing left to shore up the bench, which has 3 weak-hitting middle INF and a catcher who can't hit his weight. Or Nick Punto's weight, for that matter.

    That's a problem, still.

    The bad calls are an increasing problem for exactly the reasons Joe suggests. Sure, they used to be there in previous years too, but with all the replays and additional camera work it's become increasingly obvious when an ump has a goofy strike zone or tanks the trap play.

    Oh, for anyone who relies on the tv strike zone "tracker"...just don't. TBS's is terrible, so is Fox's, and I doubt ESPN's is any better.

    Regarding last night's Twins/Yankees game: the Berkman "ball" call was a poor one, and it burned the Twins. But Hunter Wendelstadt's response showed that he's another guy like Country Joe West: a punk looking to be the show. He didn't need to run all the way up the the mound to break up the conference (which was in a fairly critical situation), and he didn't need to get into it with the Twins manager. But he did, and I guarantee you he smarted off when Gardy said it was a strike. How do I know? Because this guy has done it many a time before. That's just sad.

    ReplyDelete
  28. It's adorable when Yankee fans try to argue that their team isn't killing the sport.

    but do we bash the Phillies for their strong lineup and the fact that they've got 3 aces, two of whom came over in trades? Nah, guess not

    The reason Toronto had to trade Roy in the first place was because of the laughable unfairness of the system in place that prevented some really good Jays teams from getting anywhere near a post-season birth.

    ReplyDelete
  29. To those who complained that NFL replays were a bad thing, they were told: you'll get used to it. Well, I've gotten used to NFL replays all right -- I don't watch nearly as much football as I used to. This replay business has taken a large chunk of the fun out of watching college and pro football. Baseball is fine the way it is. Do not, Joe, spend a bunch of time trying to hype a "controversy" or "problem" that really doesn't exist and, even if it did, isn't nearly as big a deal as you think it is.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I've always considered myself a traditionalist, but I see no problem with using technology to get the call right. The umpires should be invisible in the box score.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I think I've come up with a way to use technology on Ball/Strike calls that could, in theory, get passed. Someone tell me if I'm crazy.

    We already have PitchF/X. Assuming it works fast enough for this (if not, it will soon, right?), hook it up to a buzzer in the Ump's ear. If there's a strike, the Ump hears a buzz. If not, he hears nothing. The Ump has the final (only) say, so he can override the computer (especially if it makes a blatant mistake). But, it would serve as a constant corrective on the Umps.

    Essentially, rather than use technology to call balls and strikes, use it to teach the Umps to call them more consistently and correctly.

    So, why won't it work?

    ReplyDelete
  32. "Oh, for anyone who relies on the tv strike zone 'tracker'...just don't. TBS's is terrible, so is Fox's, and I doubt ESPN's is any better."

    @Josh --

    And you say that based on what evidence? The only people who MIGHT be able to say that are the home plate umpire and/or the catcher. Are you either one of those people? Didn't think so.

    The techonology involved is, in today's world, ridiculously simple, so I don't think that's the source of your objection. Or do you also ignore, say, radar maps that your weather site or broadcaster show? Seriously, on what basis do you reject them, much less be able to rate them in some kind of order?
    ==========
    What kills me, and I think this is part of the ongoing problem, is the comlete and utter indifference to these graphics demonstrated by the announcers. There was one instance last night in the ATL-SF game where they were reviewing the "pitch sequence" (oh, how I hate that! We just saw all the damn pitches), and Brenly is doing the "fastball strike, curveball low" routine. They show a pitch that is at least two ball-widths inside and at least one ball-width low, according to the tracker -- and Brenly just blows right past it with something like "slider on the corner".

    No, it WAS NOT "on the corner". What happened was the umpire made a ridiculously bad call, and Brenly confirmed/compounded the mistake. Maybe this is why Josh thinks the trackers are so inaccurate?

    How hard is it to say something like "the pitcher got the benefit of that call" or "the ump appears to have missed that one"? It doesn't have to be said in an accusatory or argumentative tone, it's just a simple statement of fact. Otherwise, what is the point of even showing the tracker?

    I watch a lot of European soccer, and the announcers (probably because they are about 99% non-American) have no problem pointing out incorrect calls by officials* (and bad decisions by the players -- another pet peeve of mine.**)

    *Though soccer's approach is no better: after the disastrous officiating in the World Cup, especially with regard to "goal-no goal" calls, FIFA's response was not to embrace goal-line technology, but to add another pair of referees, one at each goal. As more than one person has observed, that's just two more chances at human error.

    **Especially egregious example last night: Ankiel makes a running catch in right-center of no particular difficulty (he wasn't even running full speed) and then, after closing his glove on the ball, falls down. Stockton immediately chimes in with "Great catch by Ankiel!" (because Ankiel hit the ground after?). No, that wasn't a great catch, it was a miserable defensive effort if Ankiel can't even stay on his feet; he's lucky he held on to the ball.***

    ***Ankiel is very quickly moving to the top of my "all-overrated" team after seeing him regularly as a Brave.

    And I wholeheartedly agree that this "it will slow the game down" meme is just nonsense. Do it with an "eye in the sky" official at the broadcast booth, limit the number of times it can be used, limit the amount of time the review can take -- are we seriously supposed to believe that it's impossible to set this up to be done in a quick and efficient manner?

    Anyway, yes, there is a problem, and yes, it is getting worse, if only because the mistakes are easier to spot and then replay. Given the amount of money at stake, one would think that the powers-that-be in all sports would be making a more intense and dedicated effort to deal with this problem.

    But I am not holding my breath.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Complaining about check swings is abusurd. Seems to me that's what started this whole rant.

    Some nitwit in an earlier post opined that there are no rules in baseball analagous to offensive/defensive pass interference. Hey, Einstein - ever hear of obstruction and interference in baseball? And you're telling me that football doesn't have the same credibility problem when it comes to holding, helmet to helmet hits, etc?

    Joe, I love your writing, but you've got to move on, man.

    ReplyDelete
  34. "The NHL and NBA regular seasons have legitimacy issues because so many teams make the playoffs."

    Really Joe? This is why they have legitimacy issues?

    ReplyDelete
  35. I'm in favor of INSTANT replay. But football does not have INSTANT replay, it has a momentum-crushing, boring, LEISURELY replay. I watch a football game to be entertained, and replay hurts the entertainment value of the game. I want it gone.

    I feel the same way about baseball. If an off-field replay official can reverse a safe/out call in ten seconds, fine. Any longer than that, I say keep it on the field.

    And it's not about total game time. I don't care that replay would shorten the overall game because of some nonsense about managers not arguing (nor do I expect them to stop; managers rarely argue a call expecting to get it reversed). I care about the PACE of the game, because it's the pace that affects my entertainment.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Yankees fans pay the highest prices in the league to enjoy their team. A trip to the ball park is expensive, so is cable and merchandise. But unlike most of the league, they put a large portion of that revenue, which their fans provide, back into the team. Isn't that a novel idea, owners actually spending a large portion of revenues on the team instead of pocketing the money. The redsox caught on, so did the phillies and even they twins spent big on mauer.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Replay could be used that would give every call in the game a much higher accuracy right now and simple methodology would ensure that the games would not need to be longer.

    Just add a fifth legitimate umpire to a crew and when they rotate one heads upstairs to the replay inner sanctum. He sees every play and can review every play before the next play begins - I'd guess better than 90% of the time.

    When there is doubt he can flick a switch and the umps on the field are notified to wait for the review. Worst case a dozen seconds extra might be necessary.

    However MLB should prohibit managers arguing with the umps if replay is put in. Perhaps he can ask for a review or some such but must leave when told to leave or be suspended a bazillion games (well just enough to get their attention so we will never have to hear "Boy manager X is getting his money's worth now that he has been tossed.")

    I am OK with not having balls and strikes be a part of the replay approach but frankly it is fairly easy to do that as well. Just put electronics in the plate that beep in the umps ear when the ball crosses the plate. Oh and record it somewhere so the ump can be punished when he decides his strike zone is better than the game's and calls a pitch a strike not over the plate.

    The ump would still have to call it in the zone even when he is told it is over the plate of course, so he would still be required.

    This works to serve all interests:

    Umpires - we get more of them on salary
    Calls - we get far more of them correct
    Time - not letting silly arguments ensue probably means the time for games goes down
    Players - well some of these will no doubt be unhappy when they correctly get called out but there shouldn't be any issues keeping them from agreeing.

    And of course the fans will be happier or at least have fewer legitimate reasons to whine which in turn means the owners have a happier fan base and no embarrassment.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Lovely. I enjoy Pos and Rob Neyer very much. But, thanks in part to them and writers like them, in a few years we'll massive instant replay, 10 (at least) playoff teams. Ridiculous WC play-in games. And WS games *every* November.

    That's not Baseball. You all can keep it.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Did anyone notice that not long after the Berkman controversy, TBS's strike zone box seemed to disappear for the next few innings? I was starting to think that MLB was embarrassed after all the attention that was being paid to the blown call, and asked TBS to back off on showing the pitch tracker for every pitch.

    Personally, I would love to replace the home-plate umpires with technology. To those who say that removes the "human element" from the game, I ask you this: do you really go to games to watch the umpires umpire?

    I didn't think so.

    ReplyDelete
  40. 1) Of course the Yankees should be successful because they do actually spend their income on the team. Those teams that don't, shouldn't be successful. A team should never be allowed to go into debt to sign a player. Ever.
    (I removed a long rant about ownership in kc)

    2) Some things could be improved. Guys like Jermaine Dye shouldn't have been sidelined because he wasn't worth 2 draft picks. The system effectively removed a good player from the field. Something needs to change.

    3) A replay system needs to happen. Technology needs to call balls and strikes. The pitching/batting matchup will be even more entertaining if these calls were 100% right. I think the great pitchers/hitters would dominate even more. I'm salivating at the thought of how this would actually impact the batter/pitcher matchups.

    4) Technology shouldn't be done in such a way to slow down the game, but rather to speed it up.

    ReplyDelete
  41. The Posey slide makes an interesting point. In real time, there was no dispute: the throw was wide and tailing, the tag was on the upper body several feet off the bag, no one on the field complained or even acted as though Posey should have been called out. Super slow replay showed that the tag beat Posey's foot hitting the base by a tenth of a second. When no one argues a call, should the call be overruled by some official watching the game on replay? Should every play of every game be subject to review? That does not appeal to me in the least.

    And what about balls and strikes? There are some egregious calls, but most "close" pitches are inconclusive on tv. We really seem to better off with umpires calling a consistent strike zone throughout a game.

    But the best way to avoid controversial calls is to make umpires be better, to hold them accountable. Wendlestadt's Twins-Yankees game last night was appallingly bad. His "strike zone" didn't change from inning to inning or batter to batter, it changed depending on the count: wide plate on the first pitch or two, basically no called strikes on two-strike pitches. Umpires should be evaluated each game in the playoffs; one bad game, done for the season.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Young almost certainly swung at that pitch. But come on, Joe. The Rays were shutout on two hits. They've scored 1 run in 18 innings. I'm having a real difficult time believing that their bats might have magically woken up had the umpire called Young out.

    ReplyDelete
  43. @Clinton,

    It's not true that the Yankees put "A large portion of their revenue into their club". They put about 46% of their revenue into payroll which is about league average.

    Let's put it this way:

    A-Rod $33 million + Jeter $22 million make as much as the entire Rangers TEAM, at $55 million.

    Javier Vazquez is making $11 million dollars and he's not even on the Yankees playoff roster. If he was on the Twins, he'd be the highest paid pitcher on the Twins staff!

    4 players: A-Rod, C.C., Jeter, And Tex, make $99 million, that's more than the entire Twins team.

    Burnett and Vazquez earned $27 million and most likely won't even pitch in the LDS. Together they earn more than the entire Twins pitching staff.

    7 players: A-Rod, C.C., Jeter, Tex, Burnett, Rivera and Posada earned $143 million this year. Those 7 players would be the highest playoff payroll team just by themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Dan in Butte, AmericaOctober 8, 2010 at 7:53 PM

    Joe, you usually have impeccable analysis, but I think you are wrong on replay. I have watched a lot of postseason and seen very few calls that need to be reviewed. Most of the examples that you gave would NEVER be reviewed under a replay system. The reason their was no argument on the Posey call is because it was a bad throw tailing towards right, and the tag was waste high. I have watched the slowmo over and over and it is very hard to tell whether the tag or base was first. The players didn't argue, the announcers didn't mention it, and the managers didn't argue. On top of that, the replays did very little to solve the problem. Only a frame-by-frame of still shots would show the truth, and I didn't have access to that.

    I am very resistant to replay in basball because I don't want to lose the spontaneity of the moment. One cannot cheer in football, because the fan has to look around for yellow or red flags to see if what he saw was real. Will it be called back? Will it be challenged? Watching football feels like you are watching the replay of a game. Baseball feels live like you are in the moment, free to cheer or cry. I know you have touched on this before.

    If you and media keep making a mountain out of a mole hill, we are going to end up with a replay system that seriously diminishes the viewing experience. I don't think I could watch if many plays were called into question.

    I just saw Bobby Cox get ejected for arguing a call at first (did foot come of bag?). The replay was totally inconclusive and the ump made a great call. Do we need to spend 5 minutes looking at that play, and decide NOT to overturn the call on the field.

    Did Matt Holliday even touch the plate in his mad dash for home on the Rockies a few years ago? We don't even know, but I have not heard a lot of replay advocates saying that the ump "blew the call." If the fans at the field can't see it any differently with their naked eye, then it is probably a reasonable call.

    I love the dramatic safe/out call at the plate in the heat of the moment, and I don't want that to become meaningless.

    Saying that yesterday was a banner day for umpire's losing legitimacy is ridiculous. The first two examples were a joke, because I have never heard you advocate reviewing balls/strikes, and checked swings.

    Anyway, keep up the good work and I always enjoy the read.

    Dan

    ReplyDelete
  45. Dan in Butte, AmericaOctober 8, 2010 at 7:55 PM

    Joe, you usually have impeccable analysis, but I think you are wrong on replay. I have watched a lot of postseason and seen very few calls that need to be reviewed. Most of the examples that you gave would NEVER be reviewed under a replay system. The reason their was no argument on the Posey call is because it was a bad throw tailing towards right, and the tag was waste high. I have watched the slowmo over and over and it is very hard to tell whether the tag or base was first. The players didn't argue, the announcers didn't mention it, and the managers didn't argue. On top of that, the replays did very little to solve the problem. Only a frame-by-frame of still shots would show the truth, and I didn't have access to that.

    I am very resistant to replay in basball because I don't want to lose the spontaneity of the moment. One cannot cheer in football, because the fan has to look around for yellow or red flags to see if what he saw was real. Will it be called back? Will it be challenged? Watching football feels like you are watching the replay of a game. Baseball feels live like you are in the moment, free to cheer or cry. I know you have touched on this before.

    If you and media keep making a mountain out of a mole hill, we are going to end up with a replay system that seriously diminishes the viewing experience. I don't think I could watch if many plays were called into question.

    I just saw Bobby Cox get ejected for arguing a call at first (did foot come of bag?). The replay was totally inconclusive and the ump made a great call. Do we need to spend 5 minutes looking at that play, and decide NOT to overturn the call on the field.

    Did Matt Holliday even touch the plate in his mad dash for home on the Rockies a few years ago? We don't even know, but I have not heard a lot of replay advocates saying that the ump "blew the call." If the fans at the field can't see it any differently with their naked eye, then it is probably a reasonable call.

    I love the dramatic safe/out call at the plate in the heat of the moment, and I don't want that to become meaningless.

    Saying that yesterday was a banner day for umpire's losing legitimacy is ridiculous. The first two examples were a joke, because I have never heard you advocate reviewing balls/strikes, and checked swings.

    Anyway, keep up the good work and I always enjoy the read.

    Dan

    ReplyDelete
  46. Me being raised a yankee fan, living in Twins country(SD) and converting to the Cubs in 1982 have seen it all. Even though the umps get a few wrong, they seem to do a good job. I play amatuer ball here in South Dakota and the worst umping we saw this year was at the state tournment. Baseball will never be perfect and the replays amplify that point. But, I wouldn't give the sport back for anything. One thing, Bud Selig does need to be replaced soon.

    ReplyDelete
  47. I agree with the part about the umpires could work together more. The part of the Denkinger fiasco that bothered me the most was the insistence (for 5 yrs or so) by Denkinger that there was no mistake. It was that kind of attitude that kept him and the other umpires of his day from ever asking for help. But realistically, how can an umpire further away from the play overrule the one who officially has the play. Probably the most the 2nd ump could do would be to call for the replay, which is just more agreement with you that replay is inevitable (growl from this traditionalist).

    ReplyDelete
  48. Really, Joe? A checked swing? A ball that should have been called a strike? Stop drinking the Kool-aid, put away the razor blades, and enjoy the game.

    There is not even a defined rule on a checked swing. Some people say did he break his wrists or did he make an attempt to swing. Heck, I don't think I would have rung him up. He stopped his bat with great control. Instant replay would be no help. By the way, you lost 6-0, shut up and score some runs.

    The ball/strike call would certainly not ever fall under that purview either. At no stadium is the home plate camera angle correct enough for us to see a ball or strike better than the ump. As for pitch f/x, it is not perfect either. A great, late breaking pitch will move through the edge or corner of the zone, but at the back of the plate will be out of the zone, and pitch f/x will show this as a ball, every time. It would be fun to see chest high strikes again, though.

    Even the Posey play, while obviously much more important to the final outcome, may not have been replayed. It was not argued at the time, It was not clear at regular speed, had to be seen about 3 times in regular slomo to be sure, and before we all saw it ad nauseum in super slomo and frozen at the point of the tag, shoved repeatedly into every moment of the game a few innings later, it was not a big deal. This play would not have been instant replayed in the live action setting.

    Also, the Denkinger call might be less infamous if it happened in today's setting, because they would have already been talking about the heinous call on Frank White at second base in the 4th inning for 5 innings at that point, hammering home the fact that the Royals should be up 1-0 after the singles by 2 of the next 3 hitters.

    ReplyDelete
  49. BobDD-Denkinger admitted that he got the call wrong the next day after seeing the replay.

    ReplyDelete
  50. The interminable grind of Instant Replay has turned me off NFL and NCAA Football more than questionable calls ever could.

    ReplyDelete
  51. The one aspect of baseball that truly seperates it from other major sports is that it is not on a clock. This allows gameplay to develop its own organic rhythm, often defined by the working pace of the pitcher. You get a fast worker and the game gets sharper, the fielders are ready to go, the whole attitude is one of aggressiveness and the feeling that SOMETHING is going to happen. Instant replay, like slow pitchers, arguments from managers, and allowing batters to step out of the box on every pitch - are all detriments to the pace and thus the enjoyability of the viewing experience.
    I say let's not allow time on the field for whining of delaying of any kind. If Bobby Cox wants to come out to argue a call, that's it - he's tossed. There's just no reason baseball should allow the game to be held up because someone with a vested interest in the result thinks he sees something better from further away than the guy who's far better positioned to see it, who's job is to watch it, and who couldn't care less about the result.

    Baseball needs a strong commissioner who enforces a crisp game that needs to be won between the lines. You don't like the call - tough luck. Baseball, like life, is full of unfairness. But real character - and thus winners and losers - are determined by what you do with what happens. We don't watch baseball for technical accuracy, we watch it for passion and character and the beauty of play.

    I love you Joe, but instant replay would be just make baseball slower and lead to more play interruptions in the future. And the day umps have a buzzer in their ear to make sure they get it right is the day I stop watching for good.

    ReplyDelete
  52. The umpiring is better than it's ever been, and anyone who says otherwise has the memory of a gnat. (Just watch an old game on MLB Network this winter. There used to be more questionable calls.) And Joe's right that none of that matters because we can see, clearer than ever, that there are plenty of mistakes made. I think another part of the problem is that players complain more about bad calls than they used to. Nope, can't prove it, but it sure feels that way watching the old games.

    I think baseball could find a smart way to add replay in an expanded capacity to the sport. But they won't. They'll find an intrusive, annoying, and indefensible way to do it instead. And THAT will be MUCH worse than the bad calls themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Wendelstedt was calling a ball consistently on the borderline outside corner pitches. When Berkman was not rung up on the pitch in question, I commented to myself that a virtually identical pitch by Pettitte had been called a ball earlier. This was validated by Berkman in his post game interview when he observed Wendelstedt was calling the wide strike on the outside to left hand batters, but his zone was tighter (maybe too tight) on the inside.
    Point is, we have all grown up with the belief that players will accept some irregularities with a given umpire's zone, as long as it is consistent throughout the game. We will never live in a perfect world, even with technology.
    Should umpires be held to a higher standard than they are now? Absolutely. As some have commented, they need to be accountable. WQith the current situation they seem to live in an entitled environment, screened from accepting consequences for their actions.

    ReplyDelete
  54. @David in NYC: I make my assessment on the fact that the graphic shows balls that were clearly outside by nearly a foot (or more) as being just off the corner and strikes nearly down the middle as just clipping the corner. (I saw one game this year where the announcers started giggling after a ball nearly 2 feet off the plate got called a strike, and the FoxTrax put it a fraction outside the box, making it look like the ump might have just missed it) It's a graphic, not an accurate representation of the path of the ball.

    @Anonymous: you can't use Berkman's comments as validation for the call. He's hardly unbiased. Wendelstadt's "zone" was goofy all night. Yes, he was more "consistent" about calling pitches just off the left side of the plate a strike (from the ump's perspective) and pitches on the edge of the right side a ball. But he still missed a lot of pitches all over the zone and couldn't be relied on to call anything correctly. he's also a snotty bastard who starts more arguments than he ends. Where are the Doug Harvey's of the world, umps so respected that they could end an argument with no one getting thrown out and everyone feeling like they'd been heard? (or the Richie Garcia's, or Bill Haller...)

    ReplyDelete
  55. It baseball is interesting in getting calls right, they need to use replay. It is absurd for millions on television to see the right call within moments, and the game goes on based on the missed call. It should be a 5th umpire in the stands with the authority to overrule calls, as simple as that. He acts at his discretion.

    And, as soon as balls and strike technology is able to do so, it obviously should be calling strikes. Why should we depend on the judgment of a person, when technology is available to provide an accurate answer. It would be fine, and perhaps necessary, to still have an umpire behind home plate with a buzzer in his ear and, perhaps, the authority to overrule the automated call.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Max HerrmannsfeldtOctober 10, 2010 at 1:26 AM

    No. You can't have the strike zone, or checked swing calls. Maybe bang-bang plays at first, or (missed) tag calls. But the variable strike zone is part of the game, and checked swings are not explicitly defined by the rulebook.

    As was mentioned near the end, perhaps the umpires should work together as a team more. Confer with each other if there is any doubt, because four umpires can have four angles. There is no reason for the closest umpire to reign supreme, if he had a bad angle. Have a conference!

    ReplyDelete
  57. The clamor over poor officiating in the MLB playoffs is one more illustration of how much more Americans care about baseball than any other sport.

    Football misses/omits penalties - often critical ones - on every single play. Holding is committed in every play, but called selectively. Ditto for pass interference (offensive or defensive). The spotting of the ball - the most important things football officials do - is haphazard by design and comically inaccurate.

    The same goes for pro basketball. Personal fouls occur dozens of times more than they are called (on a highly selective basis favoring glamorous players and teams). This deliberate bias affects the outcomes of many if not most NBA games.

    Baseball is the best-umpired sport in the world, in which almost all the plays are called right. And yet we are still outraged at its judicial imperfections. (Rightly so, since the system could be improved readily with existing technologies.) 99 percent of baseball calls are correct - which perhaps makes the one percent of errors stand out, and raise an outcry for justice. Whereas in football and basketball, officiating error is simply a normal feature of every play of every game.

    The outcry has been especially remarkable considering that the entire MLB postseason will feature fewer officiating errors than a single NFL or NBA game.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Concerning the checked swing issue, in watching MLB games played before about 1984, there was little or no problem. A full swing was necessary before a swinging strike was called. A partial or checked swing called a strike today, would be a ball, and no argument would ensue. This was the way it was when I was growing up.

    The reason I use the year 1984 as the base line year is due to the famous "Sandberg" game that I watched last winter on the MLB network. I remember Tony Kubek and Bob Costas talking about a checked swing and Kubek saying that the umpires had started interpreting a "swing" more liberally.

    ReplyDelete
  59. I don't think the Phillies get a pass for their payroll. They are part of the payroll disparity problem. So are the Red Sox. But the Phillies are still $64M less than the Yankees in payroll. Also, a big difference between the Phils and Yanks is the Yankees would have kept Cliff Lee. Thus they would have had Lee and Halladay, and they still would have picked up Oswalt at the trade deadline.
    The only disadvantage the Yankees have is they have at least one team in their division who can sort of go toe to toe with them in payroll.

    The Yankees are just the poster boy for payroll disparity. They get bad press because of it, sort of like how McDonald's gets most of the bad press for how unhealthy fast food. They aren't the only problem, but they symbolize the problem very well.

    ReplyDelete