Monday, October 18, 2010

Natural Lee

Costello: Who has it?

Abbott: Naturally.

Costello: Who?

Abbott: Naturally.

Costello: Naturally?

Abbott: Naturally.

Costello: So I pick up the ball and throw it to Naturally.

Abbott: No you don't! You throw the ball to Who.

Costello: Naturally.

Abbott: That's different.

Costello: That's what I said!

-- Who's On First

* * *

Mark Teixeira was the first New York hitter to strike out on Monday night at Yankee Stadium against Cliff Lee. Teixeira offered at an 86-mph change-up that was probably two-inches off the outside corner. That was Tom Glavine's pitch, the one he dined on for 22 seasons and 305 career victories -- a change-up just off the corner. There's almost nothing productive a hitter can do with that pitch. The only effective way to deal with it is to let it go, make the pitcher come back to the plate next time, or (if it is really close) just try to spoil it, foul it back. The problem is, the pitch looks so easy to drive. It looks so big and fluffy in the batter's line of sight. It really is the closest thing to the Bugs Bunny's perplexing slow ball. Teixeira had to try and hit it. And he had to miss.

Alex Rodriguez was the second New York hitter to strike out against Lee. The count was 2-2 and Lee threw the same 86-mph change-up that baffled Tex, a change-up just off the plate, and A-Rod did the right thing, he fouled the ball off, gave himself another pitch. Lee then threw an 87-mph change-up another inch off the plate, and A-Rod again did the right thing, he let it go ... only this time the pitch actually wasn't a change-up. It was the cutter. The ball cut back toward A-Rod at the last second, flew over the outside corner of the plate. The umpire called strike three.

Marcus Thames was the third New York hitter to strike out against Lee. He went up there to determined to hold his own, he was swinging at everything, like a guy being attacked by bees. He fouled off a fastball on the outside corner, fouled off a cutter that buzzed inside, fouled off fastball that was up and in, fouled off that dreaded change-up on the outside corner. When a hitter fouls off so many hot pitches, you credit them for hanging in there, and Thames was hanging in there. But his head was spinning. He looked a bit dizzy. He struck out swinging on a cutter that broke in when he clearly expected it to break away.

* * *

It's hard to know exactly when Cliff Lee became this sort of artist in residence. He wasn't this kind of pitcher at all when he started pitching regularly for the Cleveland Indians in 2004. He was all power then, a somewhat moody 6-foot-3 lefty from Arkansas who could and did throw high-90s gas. He had other pitches, for whatever that's worth ... a mediocre slider, a promising but undeveloped curveball, a Fleetwood Mac change-up that would go its own way. He was an archetype then, a hard-throwing lefty without much of an idea. He'd strike you out, he'd walk you, he'd give up long home runs, he'd get in trouble with his other pitches and then, often enough, get out of it with his best heat. And when he did poorly, he'd get furious. He once threw his glove 20 rows into the stands.

He won 18 games in 2005 and lost only 5 and because of that differential he got some Cy Young votes he probably did not deserve (his 2.3 Wins Above Replacement that year was 33rd among American League starters). He was probably thought of as being better than he actually was as a pitcher. He won 14 more in 2006, though his 4.40 ERA was only slightly better than league average and scouts muttered that his fastball was losing velocity.

* * *

Jorge Posada was the fourth New York hitter to strike out Monday night. Lee threw him five fastballs to five different parts of the plate. There was nothing tricky involved. Lee threw a fastball low and outside, then one up and over the middle, a third belt high and inside, a fourth over the outside corner and finally that last over the inside corner. Posada swung through the last one. Every one of those pitches registered at 91 or 92 mph.

Curtis Granderson was the fifth New York hitter to strike out. He swung and missed a curveball. It was the fifth curveball that Lee had thrown on the night -- and the first four were all called for balls. Lee generally seems to throw the curveball when he sees the concentric circles spinning in batters eyes, when he can tell their minds are muddled and they are guessing. Usually the hitters buckle and let the curveball go and hope for the umpire to call it a ball (something umpires often do -- perhaps just to keep things fair). This time Granderson swung. He missed.

Derek Jeter was the sixth New York hitter to strike out. Pitchers all around baseball know that Jeter cannot hold back on high fastballs. They have always been his baseball temptress. He has had plenty of success on high fastballs, which makes them dangerous pitches to throw. But if you can throw the fastball just one inch higher than Jeter likes it, one inch, you can finish him off. Cliff Lee throws the 93-mph fastball one inch higher than Jeter likes it. And Jeter swung and missed.

* * *

Nothing went right from the start in 2007 for Cliff Lee. He injured his groin in spring training. He was not quite ready for his fastball to lose some of its heat. The Indians were badgering him to throw more of his secondary pitches, to not rely so much on his fastball.

And, though he'd had some success, he really did not know how to be a pitcher. That lack of certainty finally bubbled to the surface. Hitters teed off. Lee gave up 28 doubles and 17 home runs in fewer than 100 innings. Those secondary pitches still had no shape, and his fastball was not getting him out of trouble anymore, and Lee felt the world closing in. He beaned Sammy Sosa on the night Sosa was being honored for hitting his 600th home run and did not even leave the mound to check on him (sparking an argument between Lee and his catcher, Victor Martinez). Lee mockingly tipped his cap to booing fans. The Indians had a very good team in 2007, and they really did not need that sort of thing. Lee was sent to the minor leagues.

It isn't like everything changed in the minor leagues, either. It doesn't work like that. Lee walked 25 in 41 Class AAA innings down there. But getting sent to the minor leagues when you're a 28-year-old pitcher is a challenge moment, a "Who am I going to be?" kind of moment. Many don't make it back. Lee found a whole other pitcher in himself.

* * *

Nick Swisher was the seventh New York hitter to strike out, and at this point Lee was so mesmerizing that Swisher was actually CELEBRATED for his strikeout. Hey, at least he made Lee work. He fouled off six straight pitches -- an up-and-away fastball, a cutter that worked its way back over the plate, an up-and-in fastball, a down-and-in cutter, a fastball that brushed the outside of the plate, and a fastball that brushed the inside of the plate. None of those pitches, not one of them, was a good pitch to hi, but they were strikes anyway, and Swisher spoiled them one after another, and maybe this was the only way to get to Lee, maybe the only real plan was to keep fouling off pitches until he made his mistake. Lee then threw a cutter outside and at the knees and Swisher swung over it. No mistake this time.

Thames was the eighth strikeout victim. Last time he was fooled by a cutter. This time he swung over a curveball that bounced just beyond the plate. Catcher Bengie Molina chased down the ball and threw it to first to complete the strikeout.

Granderson was the ninth strikeout. Lee and Molina apparently realized he first time through that Granderson could not lay off Lee's curveball. That pitch had become hypnotic for Granderson. So Lee threw the curve with two strikes and Granderson did swing though he managed to foul it off. He was not completely asleep yet. Lee threw a low and away fastball that Granderson fouled off, and then threw the curveball again. This time Granderson amenably swung and missed.

* * *

Lee was a thoroughly different pitcher in 2008. There's the famous story about the jazz genius Charlie Parker, how he was nothing particularly special as a saxophonist, then he went away for a while and when he came back he was, in the words of Buck O'Neil, "blowing sounds nobody had ever heard before."

Cliff Lee started off the 2008 season by winning his first six starts. His seventh start he threw nine shutout innings but took a no-decision. His ERA then was 0.67. His strikeout to walk ratio was 44-to-4.

What happened? Suddenly, Lee's control was pinpoint, his curveball was unhittable, his change-up was tantalizing, his cutter was devastating. Baseball people talk all the time about "the light coming on." That was the usual line about Lee in 2008 -- he suddenly figured things out. The light came on.

But ... what light? It's not like Lee figured out one or two things. He was inventing a whole different kind of pitching. What other lefty could come at you with five pitches, all commanded, all controlled? Who else could be a little bit of Glavine AND a little bit of Maddux? It was startling, not because Lee had become a great pitcher -- that always seemed possible -- but because he had become THIS KIND of great pitcher. He walked just 34 batters all year. He gave up the fewest home runs per nine innings in the league. He led the league in ERA. He was preposterously good in a whole new way. He had become a power pitcher AND a finesse pitcher. And hitters were dizzy.

And then, because of his circumstances, Lee became something else -- gun for hire. The Indians could not afford him, so Lee was traded to Philadelphia where he had one of the great postseasons ever, winning four games with a 1.56 ERA. But there was something weird about his relationship with the Phillies, something just a little bit off, and the Phillies traded him to Seattle before this season after getting Roy Halladay, an odd move that nobody quite understood. Then it looked like he would be traded to the Yankees, and he ended up in Texas instead.

And this year, despite injuries and a brief slump, Lee walked 18 batters in 212 innings. Eighteen batters. He doesn't give up home runs. He throws complete games. His 10.28 strikeout-to-walk ratio is the best ever for a pitcher who has thrown 200 innings. Best. Ever.

And though Halladay threw a no-hitter, and Lincecum had his brilliant game against the Braves, this has been Lee's postseason. He is the master at work.

* * *

Jeter was the 10th strikeout. The Yankees had actually managed to get the leadoff man on base for the first time in the game ... and that leadoff man was burner Brett Gardner. There was little doubt he would try to steal. The TV announcers seemed a bit excessive in their praise Jeter for allowing strike two -- an inside-corner fastball -- go by so that Gardner could steal second base. They did not say much of anything, when Jeter swung and missed another temptress fastball an inch higher than useful.

Which for some reason reminds me of this exchange in the movie Gandhi.

Gandhi: You're a temptress!

Margaret-Bourke White: Just an admirer.

Gandhi: Nothing is more dangerous, especially for an old man.

Thames was strikeout No. 11. By now, poor Marcus seemed struck out before he ever stepped into the batter's box. Lee threw five pitches, all on the inner half of the plate, the last a high fastball that Thames swung under. He might have been expecting something else. Or he might have given up expecting. This was his third strikeout. On this night, it's clear Thames could not hit a ball off a tee if Cliff Lee had been the one to put it there.

Posada was strikeout No. 12. He could have been called out on a two-strike curveball that just barely missed the outside corner -- the announcers would say it went "around the strike zone," a common phrase in baseball though my friend and former big-league umpire Steve Palermo told me that such a thing is impossible. He said the ball doesn't bend that much -- CANNOT bend that much. "A ball cannot go around the strike zone!" Palermo says with authority. Maybe Posada was pondering this question when he watched a 92 mph fastball go over the inside half of the plate for strike three.

Finally, Brett Gardner was the 13th strikeout. Gardner had gotten the only clean hit against Lee -- Posada had managed a bloop single -- and he had almost beaten out an infield hit with what is becoming his trademark slide-into-first-base maneuver. So he was the one guy in the Yankees lineup who seemed to have an idea of how to hit Lee.

So Lee had one last guy to figure out. He had the rest of the Yankees utterly defeated. He had fooled Jeter with high fastballs and Granderson with low curves. He had make Teixeira look foolish on slow change-ups, and he baffled A-Rod with his cutter. He had sent some frustrated Yankees fans home.

Lee threw a fastball on the outside corner for called strike one.

Yes, some of the Yankees crowd had gone home. They had come to the ballgame for a party; they did not need to see any more of this Cliff Lee making a shambles of this three-quarter-of-a-billion-dollar lineup. It is hard to appreciate artistry when it is done at your team's expense, in your ballpark, in your city ...

Lee threw a fastball on the outside corner for called strike two.

Eric Clapton has said that music can be condensed to a single note, if that note is played with the right sincerity. Cliff Lee stood on the mound with an 0-2 count against Brett Gardner and he could have thrown an infinite variety of pitches. He could have thrown his change-up away, his cutter in, his curveball down, his fastball up, his slider (which he rarely throws anymore) down and in, and he could have mixed and matched any of those pitches and those locations. It wouldn't really matter. He now had Brett Gardner as captivated and spellbound as everyone else. He could do pretty much anything, as long as he did with sincerity. All he had to do was throw the ball to who. Who? Naturally.

Cliff Lee threw a fastball on the outside corner. And Brett Gardner watched it go by for strike three.

55 comments:

  1. "he was swinging at everything, like a guy being attacked by bees."

    I've never, ever, read a better description of Shawon Dunston's hitting approach.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "a Fleetwood Mac change-up that would go its own way."

    Love this! Excellent job, as usual, Mr. Posnanski.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The control is the bizarre part to me. Like you said, Joe, he always had it in him, and guys do develop their pitches later in their careers (although multiple ones at once like Lee isn't as common), but the ridiculous command and control is just strange. He never did it before and he wasn't really doing it in the minors when he got sent down. I was SURE that 2008 was a fluke from that perspective...not that I thought he was going to revert to "2007 Cliff Lee" or even 2006 Cliff Lee, but I figured the walk rate had to be a fluke. Yet he's gotten even better. It's crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You know, if a hitter suddenly added as much power to his hitting as Lee added (everything) to his pitching, no one would believe it was possible.

    So what drug is there that does this for a pitcher? And what will happen when every pitcher starts using it?

    ReplyDelete
  5. In all fairness, Blue calling the pitches behind the plate was equally mezmerized. That called third strike on Gardner was a ball, and I think Blue just went with the flow.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Joe,
    You have become the sportswriting equivalent of Cliff Lee, Roy Halladay, & Tim Lincecum combined. And I don't even think you are aware of it. You just banged out a "blog entry" as masterful as most sportwriters (or any writers) could hope for as the high water mark of their year, or career even. I hope nobody is talking to you in your office, because you have a no-no going...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Joe, you're a phenomenal writer, by far the best sportswriter in the country right now.

    Thank you for always entertaining me, educating me, and making me feel. . . .something.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great post, made all the sweeter by the fact that Lee was doing this on the road against the best hitting and most hated team in baseball.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Beautiful writing, greatly appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  10. On #12, I would have added that Posada knew it and started towards the dugout before the ump called strike 3.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The umpiring is an interesting part of all of this. Joe mentioned Lee using his curve only sparingly, and that "Usually the hitters buckle and let the curveball go and hope for the umpire to call it a ball (something umpires often do -- perhaps just to keep things fair)." Often the ump is just as surprised as the hitter at a breaking ball when the pitcher hasn't thrown many. That surprise is what often leads to the pitch being called a ball.

    And the comment about the umpire being "mesmerized" by Lee is probably true. A pitcher who throws so many strikes is likely to get the close calls. Hitters complained for years that Maddux and Glavine benefitted from a wider strike zone than other pitchers got.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Generally, I hate sports writing. This is the best thing I've read on any subject for quite some time. Amazing.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Great writing Joe. I watched the whole game and your recounting of each strikeout was as mesmerizing to me now as Cliff Lee's pitches were to the Yankees lineup last night.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Genius pitching deserves genius writing. Beautiful job, Joe. Actually reminds me a lot of the post you did on Greg Maddux vs. the Yankees.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I'm not sure who was better, you or Cliff Lee. Either way.

    ReplyDelete
  16. So what you're saying is that Lee, like Parker, used smack to unleash his genius?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Cliff Lee is the greatest postseason pitcher in baseball history at this point.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Tremendous post. Much like Lee's performance, I enjoyed the art from beginning to end. Nothing much else to add. Lee's Game 3 and your post speak for themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  19. If you change blogs or this website goes down or the internet breaks, you have to keep this article somehow and preserve it for posterity.

    ReplyDelete
  20. @ Chris Fiorentino...he's certainly moving into the discussion, but he's still only pitched about 60 postseason innings. How can you compare that to Curt Schilling going 11-2 over more than 100 innings? And I think Walter Johnson threw 3 complete game shutouts in one World Series. Bob Gibson and Sandy Koufax doing all of their great pitching in the World Series?

    ReplyDelete
  21. "another temptress fastball an inch higher than useful"

    I love the way you turn a phrase. Not to repeat what many have already said, but this is just another gem of a post, on top of so many more. And this one took away the tears from the Tony Pena post, supplanting them with a delighted grin.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Amazing post. I don't know how you keep doing it.

    ReplyDelete
  23. great post.

    just one thing: Cliff Lee was never a hard thrower; he never threw in the mid 90s, much less upper 90s. Fangraphs has him increasing his velocity in the last couple of years.

    in fact, when he broke out in 2002/2003, his fastball velocity was 87.2/88.8, respectively, compared to 91.3 this year

    ReplyDelete
  24. I agree the best ever conversations should wait until this postseason is over at the very least, but he is remarkable. As a Philly fan I'm over the trade (though I still believe Amaro just out-smarted himself), but I do enjoy to watch him pitch.

    I still remember his quote after the yawn game last year. About his being cool, he explained why be nervous, he worked his whole life for it. I think that's perfect for any profession.

    ...though it indirectly contradicts with...

    The story out today, where he basically said he likes to wing it. It may or may not be true, but it does look like more fun that way. Pedro might have worked very hard, but he always had the look of a guy winging it.

    Back to the yawn... the perfect response to facing Goliath which is the perfect Yankee anecdote. I hope he doesn't go there, just so we can continue to watch it.

    ReplyDelete
  25. For anyone questioning the ump on the last K of Gardner

    http://www.brooksbaseball.net/pfxVB/numlocation.php?pitchSel=424324&game=gid_2010_10_18_texmlb_nyamlb_1/&batterX=56&innings=yyyyyyyyy&sp_type=1&s_type=3

    ReplyDelete
  26. I had the good fortune of being at that game. Of the many, many ballgames I've been to in person, that was the single best pitching performance I've ever seen.
    Tragically, the game was tainted by a man next to me who would yell out "Get it, it's just a can of corn!" every single time a Rangers player hit a fly ball and kept demanding that Andy Pettite make the Rangers players hit the ball to a very specific point in the field ("make him hit it to center! You gotta a lot of room out there!" and "make him ground it to Cano!"). Pettite was kind was being a jerk and annoying him by refusing to show the unprecedented power of causing a batter to hit a ball a certain way to a specific spot.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I keep thinking about this post, even though I read it a few hours ago. It's really brilliant. I think what I like about it is that Joe puts a lot of effort into capturing the greatness of Lee's performance. There's detail, there is insight. It's very, very well done. I think it satisfies the urge of many fans to revel in their team's (or a player's) greatness. I'm not a Rangers fan, but I appreciate this post nonetheless.

    As an example, I've watched the "Faith Rewarded" DVD about the 2004 Red Sox season and it's 90 minutes long. But it fails to capture the magic of that season. It does in parts, don't get me wrong. I love the DVD. But I think it would take 90 minute DVDs for every postseason game to do that season justice.

    But Joe captured the essence of the game last night. The post is up there with a few other columns from way back that I still remember, one being Thomas Boswell's epic column about the 1-game playoff between the Sox and Yanks in '78, another Boswell column about Bill Buckner in the 1986 WS, and Peter Gammons' column about game 6 of the '75 WS.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Great post, but we spoiled brilliant readers expect no less.
    I'm happy for Lee. I love a good comeback. I also have a few Parker solos on my MP3 player. Think I'll plug in the ear buds.
    It will be like a Drambuie after a fantastic meal.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Like the song the Lees of Old Virginia, from 1776:
    You see it's here-a-Lee, there-a-Lee
    And everywhere-a-Lee-a-Lee

    Social-Lee, political-Lee, financial-Lee, natural-Lee
    Internal-Lee, external-Lee, fraternal-Lee, eternal-Lee
    ...
    Franklin:
    When do you leave?

    Lee:
    Immediate-Lee!
    Here-a-Lee, there-a-Lee!

    Franklin:
    When will you return?

    Lee:
    Short-Lee!
    Here-a-Lee, there-a-Lee!
    And I'll come back triumphant-Lee!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Performances such as this are why it's great to have the Yankees reach the post season every year.

    And how about that crowd? The only people who stayed for the final out were the cleaning staff.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I was in the ballpark last night and Joe is right on about Swisher's strikeout. It was like applauding a ten year old in Little League for fouling a couple off against a dominant 12 year old.

    I think that by the fourth inning many in attendance had already given up on winning the game and were just quietly hoping the Yanks would not get no-hit.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I have been devouring dozens of articles, columns, and blog posts about last night's game. Most seem to struggle for the words to describe it and turn to cheap superlatives.

    Your column - not only painted it beautifully, but it was moving and thought-provoking on a man's ability to get right.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Fantastic post, but then we've come to expect that here. It's amazing how much magic the descriptions of the Yankees going down add to that performance last night. It makes Lee's already spectacular performance practically ethereal.

    As far as witnessing artistry, I can somewhat appreciate something like that happening against the home team. I remember last year when Pujols just crushed a grand slam against the Royals, something we all felt coming, knowing that someday I'd be able to tell people that I had witnessed perhaps the best player of this generation take one deep. It's not art, but it's a similar feeling.

    It's the reason home crowds will applaud a no-hitter that the opposing pitcher performed on their team. I would think it's easier to do in the regular season than in the post, where each loss really gets you closer to elimination.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I just loved the Swisher at-bat that got the crowd all worked up. Nothing like seeing the unbearably obnoxious, overly entitled, willing to spend way too much money to impress their drunken hedge fund manager colleagues, "Yankees always win" so-called "fans"* being reduced to giving a standing ovation to a 3-2 count -- well, except maybe seeing them reduced to utter silence by Cliff Lee for almost the entire game.

    *Just LOVED how all the "fans" stuck around for the end of the game. I guess when you are putting your $5,000 tickets on an expense account, who cares about the game.

    But even better, the next day I get to read another gem from Joe all about it.

    Joe, I know this is getting redundant, but you are truly a sportswriting genius (and I am not sure I really needed the "sports" part of that statement).

    ReplyDelete
  35. They're the worst fans in sports.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I enjoyed this post so much I was bummed when it was done. well-done. one of the best I've ever read.

    ReplyDelete
  37. What Cliff Lee did last night with a cutter, a change, and a curve, Joe did today with a timely issue, a thorough knowledge of the game, and a masterful eloquence with the written word. We're luck to live in the Cliff Lee era and in the Joe Posnanski era.

    ReplyDelete
  38. That strikeout to walk ratio is sick. Although I have to give some credit to Bret Saberhagen, who had an 11.0 in 177.1 innings in strike shortened 1994.

    ReplyDelete
  39. One of the best articles I have ever read. It does Cliff Lee justice. he's been unbelievable these past two years in the playoffs.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Great article, Joe. Consider me mesmerized.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Joseph,

    This is the kind of essay that causes us to sing about Ole' Joe around the campfire. Informative, touching, funny, poignant, and downright superb.

    Best of all, no mention of Bill James and/or his butler, Rob Neyer.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Reading this felt a bit like watching Costner's "the perfect game", but removing the personal scenes with more baseball.

    ReplyDelete
  43. So if the Rangers win the World Series, does Jack Zduriencik win MLB executive of the year?

    ReplyDelete
  44. One thing I loved about Cliff Lee as a Mariner this year was that with the team just about falling apart around him, he was a professional in every sense of the word from the day he got there to the day he left. His work ethic rubbed off on Felix Hernandez, and witness the results.

    ReplyDelete
  45. After reading Posnanski's blogs, I sometimes think that rather than Joe writing an amazing story about the world, the world shapes itself to an amazing Posnanski story.

    How else can you explain how perfectly Brett Gardner's strikeout fits into the above story? Joe wrote it and the universe obliged.

    ReplyDelete
  46. I loved this post, Joe. I can't wait to read a post - soon, I hope - about the wisdom of intentionally walking David Murphy in Game 4 of this series.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Joe, I hate to say it, but you're getting monotonous. One note, played sincerely? Yeah, right, monotonous like watching Cliff Lee, Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine, or Pedro Martinez pitch.

    Thank you, Joe. I check this site many times a day, hoping to seeing your next gem. I'm filled with anticipation, but never disappointed.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Joe,
    I will always be grateful to my son for turning me on to your writing, your work has given me endless enjoyment.
    Great post on Lee, he really reminds me of Maddux, my son, the one who introduced me to your writing, told me that Maddux's strike zone was six inches bigger than anyone else, because of his ability to use the black, Lee has the same control.

    ReplyDelete
  49. TRich (No not that one)October 20, 2010 at 8:16 AM

    Joe,
    After seeing Cliff Lee in Seattle at the beginning of this year, do you get the feeling that Zack could be this way also in the post season. Cliff wasn't lighting things up in Seattle with a bad team, but give him a reason to pitch well and look at what happens. I am wondering if Zack could/would be the same way if he had the post season on his horizon. Your thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  50. Joe,

    I posted this elsewhere, but thought I'd chime in here, as well.

    This piece got me thinking about how there is little need, these days, for game recounts. Everyone follows it via some form of media, and the colorful recaps of the pre-radio era are no longer needed. And I think some sportswriters lament that their career no longer calls for those flourishes.

    Yet you found a way to describe something (at length) that we all watched in a way that was riveting, poetic, and illuminating. And you did it without relying on any sort of access (though it is obviously available to you).

    Marvelous.

    Thank you, Joe.

    -VM

    ReplyDelete
  51. Brilliant.

    Thank you

    ReplyDelete
  52. As a Phillies fan I NEED to know more about this;

    "But there was something weird about his relationship with the Phillies, something just a little bit off, and the Phillies traded him to Seattle before this season after getting Roy Halladay, an odd move that nobody quite understood. "

    Yes we eventually got Halladay and then Oswalt...but had Cliff Lee signed for this year. HAD him. Then we didn't.

    ReplyDelete