After the game, (James) Harrison said he tries to hurt opposing players because it helps the Steelers win, although he doesn't try to injure players.
-- AP story about James Harrison saying he might retire from football.
* * *
It's all there, I think. The whole NFL issue -- right there in one seemingly incongruous English sentence. You already know that Harrison, the Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker, had two helmet hits in the game against Cleveland Sunday, one that caused a Joshua Cribbs concussion, the other that caused a Mohammed Massaquoi concussion.
The Massaquoi hit was particularly savage -- savage enough that the NFL fined Harrison $75,000 (though not savage enough to draw an actual penalty during the game). Harrison was so outraged -- and perhaps puzzled -- by this fine that he was excused from practice Wednesday, apparently so he could ponder his future. He had said on the radio that he was not sure he could go on playing in a game that was foreign to him. Those hits, he says, were exactly what he had been TAUGHT to do on a football field. They were clean hits. They were textbook hits. And now, to have those hits referred to as dirty, to be fined for them and perhaps (down the road) to be suspended for these kinds of hits -- as the NFL is now threatening -- well, supposedly Harrison isn't sure he wants to play that game.
This is actually a common reaction among some players to the NFL's recent reaction to big hits. The league has talked about really cracking down on these hits to protect players, and I've read numerous comments from players who think that's a lousy thing. Most of it is summed up in what Brian Urlacher told the Chicago Tribune, in the midst of a rather entertaining tirade: ""You know what we should do? We should just put flags on everybody. Let's make it the NFFL -- the National Flag Football League. It's unbelievable."
But to get back to the line at the top -- I think whole thing is wrapped up there. Read it again.
-- Harrison wants to hurt opponents.
-- Hurting opponents helps win games.
-- Harrison doesn't want to injure opponents.
The town between Hurt and Injure. The valley between Pain and Damage. This the tiny little sliver of land where the National Football League tries to exist. Pro football is about hard contact, it has always been about hard contact. There's Chuck Bednarik standing over an unconscious Frank Gifford. There's Raiders owner Al Davis explaining his basic strategy for winning: "The quarterback must go down. And he must go down hard." There's Turkey Joe Jones throwing Terry Bradshaw on his head. There's Butkus, snarling, breathing smoke even on warm days, tackling with such ferocity that you can almost feel him trying to finish the play off by biting off the running back's head. "I never set out to hurt anybody deliberately," Butkus would famously say, "unless it was, you know, important, like a league game." There's Lawrence Taylor breaking Joe Theisman's leg on Monday Night Football, and the Gifford himself, now as announcer, telling you turn away if you cannot handle the gruesomeness.
And as the players get bigger, strong, faster, the hits get harder, louder, more spectacular. The NFL may claim otherwise ... but the league wants this. We as fans want this. Big hits equals big action. It's not that hard to understand. The NFL releases videos with the most ferocious of these hits, set to music, with stories about the hits being told lovingly, Crunch Course, Crunch Course II, Big Blocks and King Size hits. Steve Atwater once told me he would put his kids to bed at night with the story of the preposterously crushing hit put on running back Christian Okoye.
We love big hits. We remember them. We talk about them forever -- who can forget running back Earl Campbell lowering his head into the chest of Isaiah Robertson and sending him flying backward (Campbell would always feel bad about that hit; he said for a while it ruined Isaiah Robertson's life -- it is still shown quite often in highlight packages). In different cities, the NFL teams celebrate the most breathtaking hits on the scoreboard, that big hit usually sponsored by a local company, a brick company, maybe. This is FOOTBALL man. We can't tolerate missed tackles. We want receivers to fear the middle. We watch the linebacker close in behind the quarterback, the blind side, and the quarterback can't see him coming, and we know it, and the cheers grow louder, the anticipation thicker, we wait impatiently for it, a hit so hard that the ball will go flying and the quarterback will seem to bend backward and ...
But we don't want anyone to get injured. Not seriously injured, for sure. That's the worst, that moment when the game has stopped, the doctors are huddled over someone on the ground ("He's not moving!") and the players surround the scene, many of them with their helmets off, on one knee, like they're praying, some are praying, the football game has turned into a funeral scene, no, nobody wants that. Isn't that why fans always cheer as players come off the field, either under their own power or on a stretcher? We are with you! We are thinking about you! Nobody wants to see a player seriously hurt, his life forever altered. Nobody wants to meet a former NFL hero in a mall or an airport, and see them limp and groan as they walk. No, nobody wants that. No we want them all to pop back up, like Wile E Coyote always pops up no matter how many times he falls off a cliff, no matter how many times he is crushed by a boulder, no matter how many times his Acme rocket collides head on into cactus.
And here is the riddle of football -- how can you hurt without injuring, how can you weaken without harming, how can you send a receiver flying backward and have him pop right back up, good as new, Wile E. Coyote gone back to the drawing board? The NFL keeps wanting us to believe there's a real answer to this riddle. The league makes the equipment better -- or at least that's what we keep hearing and desperately want to believe. They make the pads more secure, we hear. They make the helmets safer, we are told (though the New York Times had this haunting story Wednesday). The trainers tape every bendable part before before every practice and every game as if the players are windows in the eye of a hurricane -- or at least that's what we choose to believe.
The NFL tinkers with the rules constantly to prevent the most dangerous of hits -- the chop-block, the clip, the clothesline, the horse collar, the helmet-to-helmet, the trip, the facemask grab, the forearm shiver, the punch, the unloading on a defenseless receiver and whatever devastating tackle they will come with next. The NFL makes the injuries part of the fabric of the sport so that they sound bland ... they even release injury reports each week with the tamest-sounding of conditions -- probable, questionable, out. Probable means they're playing no matter how much pain they're in. Questionable means they might not play, but they also might. Out means out. Put someone else on your fantasy team.
And with all this, we want to believe that it's all not as bad as it looks. We need to believe it so we can enjoy the games. We LOVE pro football. And when we see something like this -- those are the 57 injuries this week listed as concussions, head injuries or migraines -- well, it's tough to know exactly how to feel. The town between Hurt and Injure. The valley between Pain and Damage. We want to believe this place exists. We LOVE pro football.
Some years ago, I wrote a story about the pain my friend Priest Holmes would feel after every single game. Priest Holmes was a running back in the NFL for 10 years, a great one. He suffered a torn ACL, a devastating hip injury, and at the end there were times when he lost feeling after hits. He carried the football 1,780 times, caught another 334 passes, and that means even if you take away his 94 touchdowns that would mean he still was tackled more than 2,000 times, which of course doesn't include the many times he had to block, or his time as kamikaze man on special teams. It doesn't include what happened after the whistle. Defenders would do just about anything to stop him, intimidate him, discourage him -- you don't want to know what goes on inside those piles of pads and players. After games, he would walk slowly to get a long rubdown, he would sit in hot tub of water for a long time, and we reporters -- being reporters -- would gripe about what was taking him so long.
When I wrote about his extreme pain, I got a surprising number of emails from people who made it clear: They didn't want to hear it. One response in particular stands out in my mind, it was an email tirade from a very angry guy who said he worked hard for a living, and he didn't care how much Priest Holmes hurt. It was his job to hurt. And anyway, the man wrote, he doubted the pain was even that bad. Priest was just complaining to get attention. He wasn't tough enough. He wasn't durable enough. And those hits are not THAT bad.
I was disgusted by the callousness of the man. Disgusted. And then I realized, no ... my disgust ... had little to do with the man ... I was disgusted because ... haven't I believed many of those same things? Haven't I thought, "Oh that hit didn't look that bad?" Haven't I thought, "Oh, he's faking the injury?" Haven't I thought, "Come on, how long should a leg injury keep you out?" Doesn't loving professional football DEMAND that you believe many of those same things?
So where are we now? There's a real momentum now to stop the most bloodthirsty of hits. We do, many of us, most of us even, worry that the game is getting too scary, too painful, it's hard to maintain our suspension of disbelief. We want the NFL to do something about the injuries. But, what? We still want the NFL to still be about pain. We want both those things, same time. And are we really willing -- in that place deep down, in what what Jack Nicholson in "A Few Good Men" called "places you don't talk about at parties" -- really willing as fans to give up pain to stop injuries?
"We should just put flags on everybody," Urlacher said, you will remember. "Let's make it the NFFL -- the National Flag Football League. It's unbelievable." How many fans do you think cheered when he said those words. How many fans felt like he was taking those words right out of their own gut?
I should add here that in the actual interview, Harrison explained the difference between hurting a player and injuring them -- or at least the difference in his mind. "I don't want to see anyone injured," he told reporters. "But I'm not opposed to hurting anyone. ... There's a difference. When you're injured, you can't play. But when you're hurt, you can shake it off and come back. I try to hurt people."
How can someone -- even a former NFL defensive player of the year -- tackle someone hard enough to hurt them but not injure them? Harrison didn't explain it. And, of course, he hasn't exactly walked that fine line. He was reportedly thinking about retiring before playing in a league where he could not cause as much pain, but Harrison is back at practice today. Turns out that he has decided he loves football too much to retire from it. Yep. That's about where most of us stand.
Joe, I'm still getting over the amazing reread of the Tony Pena story. *sniff-sniff*
ReplyDeleteAbout NFL violence, I still remember when Shane Matthews could hardly step into the ambulance after getting knocked out of a Bears game a few years ago.
"And then I realized, no ... my disgust ... had little to do with the man ... I was disgusted because ... haven't I believed many of those same things?"
ReplyDeleteJoe, you're locked into Shatner Mode! Snap out of it!
How much of 'bigger/stronger/faster' is a result of unchecked PED use? It's well past time to seriously crack down on it.
ReplyDelete"Nobody wants to see a player seriously hurt..."
ReplyDeleteI think that's the crux of it. We were all fine with this when it was out of sight and out of mind.
Very well written, Joe
Channing Crowder says "They give me a helmet, I'm going to use it." And that's the crux of the problem, I think -- the helmet was once meant to provide protection but has evolved into a weapon. I'm no expert, but I remember a long time ago reading that the answer was padded helmets, that these would protect just as well but would not be useful as a weapon. But the NFL would never consider it because people like the look of the hard shiny helmets and the sound they make in collisions.
ReplyDeleteOr they could do what Joe Paterno suggests: eliminate face masks, which would force people to tackle properly.
Doesn't the research show that LESS padding results in fewer injuries? Of course, I'm assuming that most of those studies have included clean athletes as opposed to the PED-addled cyborgs that the NFL employs.
ReplyDeleteI've taken Graphite's suggestion and become a fan of Rugby--NRL in particular. I really wish Rugby League would become more popular in North America. When I watch it, I can't help but feel as though it's closer to the sport of Red Grange and Jim Thorpe than the modern NFL. Almost no pads, zero obesity, and incredible bone-rattling hits. Even the kicker gets dirty. It reminds me of the backyard football games I played as a kid with my friends. The only thing missing is the forward pass, but it's a decent trade-off for the continuous play and no commercials.
"He carried the football 1,780 times, caught another 334 passes, and that means even if you take away his 94 touchdowns that would mean he still was tackled more than 2,000 times, which of course doesn't include the many times he had to block, or his time as kamikaze man on special teams."
ReplyDeleteI also doesn't include years playing in college or years of near-daily practice. The hits aren't as hard, but the cumulative punishment is staggering.
"I've taken Graphite's suggestion and become a fan of Rugby--NRL in particular. I really wish Rugby League would become more popular in North America. When I watch it, I can't help but feel as though it's closer to the sport of Red Grange and Jim Thorpe than the modern NFL. Almost no pads, zero obesity, and incredible bone-rattling hits."
ReplyDeleteAnd lots and lots of injuries. Google "Rugby broken neck" sometime. And then think that these guys aren't nearly as big or strong as NFL players.
I love football. I live and die with the Green Bay Packers every week. But I can't help but wonder if pro football is really something we can conscionably condone in society. I've been worried about many of these same things lately. I just got married this summer, and I'm really hoping that, when we have kids, I have the strength to tell my kid(s) that he/they can't play football because it's too unsafe. I can't imagine NOT loving pro football, and I can't imagine boycotting it. But there's another side of me, the side with a conscience, that just wants to eliminate this sport or DRASTICALLY change the rules. There's something wrong when it's gone this far. Thanks, Joe, because you've given voice to things I've been thinking for a long time. And you've perfectly explained my stance, too. I just don't know...
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteJoe, you and all of the more vocal critics who accuse the NFL of hypocrisy about this issue (Schlereth, Urlacher, &c.) are leaving out one clear and important distinction: the difference between hitting a guy and hitting him in the head. There is no tactical advantage to hitting a guy in the head other than the attempt to injure him. You can't tackle guys that way; you can't dislodge the ball that way (unless, of course, you knock the guy unconscious and he fumbles, which is exactly what happened to Cribbs). I'm all for massive hits--I love watching them--but there is no reason to ever intentionally hit a guy in the head other than dirty play. If these players are as quick and skilled as they want us to believe, they should be able to direct where they unload their hits, most of the time at least.
ReplyDeleteThe point of your post seems to be that we should feel some tension between celebrating big hits and not wanting players to get injured. My main point is there is no hypocrisy--absolutely none--in the NFL and its fans celebrating bone-jarring hits to the body and seeking to protect players from concussions that result from helmet to helmet hits (though I don't discount that those are the only types of hits that cause injury).
When was the last time you saw ESPN/CBS/Fox/NFLFilms offer a post-game defensive highlight with a well executed "hit and wrap" tackle?
ReplyDeleteWhile the next may not be the first, in comparison to highlights of "launch and lead with the helmet" hits that result in a knockdown, the percentage is likely minuscule.
The networks are as complicit as the NFL (if one is looking to cast blame, as ESPN sanctimoniously throws their stones). If we're to believe that ESPN is the "world-wide leader" they claim to be, then they bear as much culpability as the NFL in shaping the fans' ambiguity and the players' attitude.
Alex: You hit it on the head, ba dum-dum. But, seriously, the practices are what turns these guys into vegetables.
ReplyDeleteA helmet-to-helmet hit in a game is seen and heard by all. Penalty or no, there is usually a fine and some discourse about it. But not in practice.
As a HS athlete, I suffered 6 concussions in 3 years, and only one in a game situation. My first, as a freshman, was playing basketball. I was screened by a moving giant and took the base of the stage (not padded) to the head.
My second and third concussions were during football practice as a junior ( I sat out football as a freshman due to overall body pain. I started playing football at age 6 in Texas and just needed a season off, which killed my chances of playing as a soph.)
My second, during a "meat squad" scrimmage (I was the meat) was due to a helmet to chin shot that a helmet would not, could not protect. Basically, I took a cheap shot. My third was later that week in another practice situation where neither the ball carrier or myself got off the ground for several minutes.
My fourth was during practice on a punt coverage drill. The mid-August field, dry as a bone, was like concrete. I slipped going in for a tackle, took a knee to the head and was out. It took several seconds to come to and get up. I couldn't feel my legs for about 10-seconds after I came to. But, dumb as ever, I got up and trotted back to the huddle to do it again, head wagging the whole way because I couldn't hold it up.
My fifth came on that next play. I made the tackle, but took a shot from another tackler who flew in, head first, and caught me. I remember nothing from that hit. I was down for the count. Again, I had no feeling in my legs, and kept thinking about my mom killing me when she found out. I finally was able to stand and wobble to the goalposts to meet the ambulance that would take me to the hospital. I sat the next two weeks until my headaches passed, but no before I tried to practice the next day by putting my pads over my neck brace. (My dad saw me, as he was a coach, and pulled me, literally, off the field. And, no, he had no hand in this. He was coaching other groups when four and five occurred.)
My final concussion happened in baseball the following spring. I, a second baseman, went up the middle to snag a grounder and collided with the SS. His knee, my head. De ja vu.
I got up, knowing what was going on, fighting the nausea and dizziness, but played on. I hit a homer, I was told. I stole a base, I was told. I parked my car in the yard, I was told.
From the time I received my second concussion, all the way through my early 20s, I suffered serious migraine headaches. I tried all colors and sizes of pills. Nothing worked. I suffered through warm-ish weather, softer-than-perceived noise, blinding light that was dimmer than a hallway bulb.
But, much like the NFL guys, I wouldn't change a thing. At least, not until I start re-suffering all of that again when I hit my mid-to-later life stages. Even as I write this, my neck throbs and I twitch occasionally. Sure, the cracked bone in my neck was the true reason for the brace, and the twitching is less often (usually once or twice a day in addition to waking up like that several times a night) than it was, and the migraines have gone from several per week to one a month.
I loved to play football, and I love to watch it now. For everything I wouldn't change, maybe it's because I avoided -- by some random, unfair, stupid chance -- of being Mike Utley. Because I'd change everything for him if I could.
They should do away with helmets. No-one is spearing without one.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I'm absolutely flabbergasted that this quote from Harrison hasn't received more attention:
ReplyDelete"I thought Cribbs was asleep," said Harrison. "A hit like that geeks you up--it geeks everybody up--especially when you find out that the guy is not really hurt--he's just sleeping. He's knocked out, but he's going to be OK. The other guy, I didn't hit that hard, to be honest with you. When you get a guy on the ground, it's a perfect tackle."
To conflate knocking someone unconscious (inflicting major brain trauma) with sleep (a recuperative brain state) is so utterly disgusting that I thought this comment alone warranted a fine from the NFL stiffer than the one Harrison received. This goes well beyond simply celebrating on the field over top of the player you've just flattened. This is saying that knowing you have seriously injured an opponent got you "geeked up" and that injuring an opposing player constitutes a "perfect tackle." Even more deplorable is the insinuation that Cribbs's injury is somehow minor, that he is "not really hurt." Just as a matter of common decency, isn't it simply conventional that you express regret when your hit injures another player?
I'll never forget meeting a former NFL player at the gym. It was unforgettable not because he was famous (he was a journeyman tight end), but because of what his legs looked like in gym shorts. It was horrific. You have to not think about that stuff to watch an NFL game.
ReplyDeleteLike Ryan says above, I can't stand helmet to helmet hits if only because they're bad tackles. First day of junior high football they teach you to tackle low. Center of gravity and all that. First day of high school wrestling and guess how they teach you to take an opponent down - it's not by his head, I guarantee you that.
ReplyDeleteTwo points:
ReplyDeleteFirst, we should get rid of helmets in football. Helmets turn players into missiles, and lead to the worst of the hits on other players. Helmets also mean that players smash their heads against each other over and over every game. Their brains are slowly being turned into mush--new research is showing that football literally causes millions of small holes to form in the gray matter as a result of the repeated low-speed impacts. We're going to see huge percentages--maybe 40 to 50% of today's players--get dementia when they hit age 45 or fifty.
Second, the NFL should be careful or the government will step in. The NFL is a workplace, and players are employees. You can have employees do certain super-dangerous jobs. This isn't the 1920's anymore, and federal labor law requires that employers provide their employees with a safe workplace. It's not clear to me that the NFL is doing what it needs to do to create a safe workplace. A class-action suit by former players for this failure would not be laughed out of court, and could easily bankrupt the league and each and every franchise.
I think the real problem is that concussions are blurring the line between hurt and injured. We know the difference between a guy with a broken leg, and a guy who just has a bruise on his leg or whatever. With concussions, though, it's beginning to seem like if your head is hurt, then you are injured and there's really not much you can do about it.
ReplyDeleteI think that football is popular because of the violence, not in spite of it. With more media coverage these days, particularly of players when they're not on the field, we get a better perspective of them as people and of the physical challenges they face as a result of the violence. This creates a bit of guilt, and I think that this is what drives us to hope that we can "fix" the problem of football injuries by tweaking the game just so.
ReplyDeleteBoxing has been popular for a very long time here, as has "professional" wrestling, where over-the-top violence is the norm. They are being supplanted in popularity by "ultimate" fighting, which seems to be much more brutal than either of the two. In spite of the steady outcry against cage fights and MMA, it does not seem to be slowing in popularity at all.
I think that many of us are like Harrison. We want to see people get hurt. But we don't want anyone to be injured.
Joe's comments about Priest Holmes are thought-provoking, but I would follow up with a simple question: Does Priest Holmes regret playing in the NFL?
ReplyDeleteI've met a number of former NFL players. I'm sure I haven't met as many as Joe, but still a fair number. I've yet to meet one who regretted playing in the league and nearly all wish they could have played longer.
The risks and punishment of playing in the league are very real. But to me the reality is that these are adults who love what they do, choose to do it freely, are well compensated (sometimes exceptionally well), are represented by a powerful union, and are tended to daily by a team of trainers and physicians. I don't think drastic reform is needed.
Here's one thing we do need: League-employed (not team-employed) physicians at every game with the unquestioned authority to pull any player off the field.
Anonymous: "I've met a number of former NFL players. I'm sure I haven't met as many as Joe, but still a fair number. I've yet to meet one who regretted playing in the league and nearly all wish they could have played longer."
ReplyDeleteWithout trying to be histrionic, I think you have not met any of the many former NFL players who developed Alzheimer's and other serious and irreversible brain conditions decades before ordinary people tend to. Part of the reason you haven't met them might be that many have committed suicide.
I love the idea of padded helmets. Picturing a giant squishy ball with gel in it.
ReplyDeleteOr some sort of air system like a beach ball...
I went to high school with and played in the same jazz combo as Karl Mecklenburg's (former Broncos Linebacker) son. Karl would come to our concerts and gigs sometimes, and it was incredibly sad. As a young Bronco fan he was one of my favorite players, but it was eye-opening to see him, still fairly young (in his 40s or early 50s), completely unable to walk. He was still a giant, but he leaned heavily on his wife and children, and used a cane.
ReplyDeleteI still am a fan of football, in a vague sense, but only because I choose to ignore those images I have of larger-than-life Karl Mecklenburg limping down the aisle of the school auditorium. He probably could not have even tackled me anymore.
Tomemos, I do think that is a bit histrionic. I only know of one former player, Terry Long, who committed suicide and was later found to have neurological problems stemming from football-related injuries. That's a tragic case and I don't intend to minimize it, but how many others have their been?
ReplyDeleteMike Webster, although he didn't take his own life, is certainly another good example of a player who had difficulties later in life, but I think both rules and equipment have evolved since his era to better protect the players.
Overall, I think NFL alumni overwhelmingly count themselves lucky to have played in the league.
Aw shucks, Joe. We've got Halladay going vs Lincecum tonight in an extreme pitcher's park (where the Game 1 HRs of Werth and Ruiz are likely outs or at worst doubles, and perhaps 1 of Ross' 2 Game 1 HRs would have been only a double) and you're giving us non-paying customers an NFL story that you could have tabled for tomorrow or later? Better still yet we won't even have to hear Joe Buck allude to the Eagles game that was just played across the street from Citizens' Bank Park 27 times during the telecast. Consider me spoiled, Bert.
ReplyDeleteIsn't the real issue not whether or not these men should be putting their bodies at such great risk - it's their own health we're talking about and they're competent adults with the right to make such a choice - but ensuring their well being after they've retired? Doesn't Mike Ditka, tough guy extraordinaire, campaign on behalf of pensions and assistance, which are to my knowledge a mere pittance at the moment, for players injuring in the line of duty, as it were?
ReplyDeleteYou know what I can't stand? When somebody gets wiped out on a block (usually on a kick or interception return) that he never saw, and the announcers get all hyped up about "what a great block that was!" Even I could make that block. In those cases, the player is essentially defenseless, just bumping the guy would be enough to take him out of the play, but usually the blocker just levels him. Did Warren Sapp seriously injure a Green Bay Packer doing that a few years ago?
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said: "Tomemos, I do think that is a bit histrionic. I only know of one former player, Terry Long, who committed suicide and was later found to have neurological problems stemming from football-related injuries. That's a tragic case and I don't intend to minimize it, but how many others have their been?"
ReplyDeleteAndre Waters is another.
Joe, hate to do it but "grown"? You meant groan.
ReplyDeleteAnd for what is worth, Pop Warner does not teach helmet to helmet hits.
A few thoughts
ReplyDelete1. People will say "How can they fine a player who was not even penalized on the play in question?" To me that is a bogus complaint. It is like a robber caught on film saying "Ya can't charge me since I wasn't caught as I committed the offense." Refs don't see everything. Often the angle of sight the ref has will be partially or completely blocked by other players.
2. I understand Harrison's point. The difference between hurt and injured is like the difference between bruised and broken. A bruise is not an injury. As a baseball coach I've seen a lot of kids try sweeping tags or soft tags and we'd always tell them to tag to bruise. We wanted the glove down hard and quick so there was no doubt in the umps mind of whether a tag was applied. We're were not advocating injuring the opponent just make sure he knows he's been tagged. Just like pitching inside, if you miss your spot it can't be high - bruise the thigh not the temple.
3. To follow up on John in Philly's point, there have been quite a few post concussion suicides and other behavioral problems. It clearly shows more should be done to monitor people after traumatic head injuries. Follow up testing should be done on a regular basis. Doctors should advise people (family, friends, employer) what to watch for, etc.
I'm a little shocked that anyone is questioning whether or not there are any recorded cases of football players suffering mental disorders at early ages. That is in large part what started this, that they are suffering dementia, suicide, aggression and Alzheimer's at far higher rates and in the case of Alzheimer's, decades before the rest of the population.
ReplyDeleteAs for the question/dilemna posed about liking football and cheering on the destruction of its participants, its a simple, stark choice and I don't get the hand wringing over it. Not just here, but elsewhere. To me, it is pretty clear. You can continue enjoying the game and accept that you are getting pleasure out of seeing the suffering of others, or you can find other things to turn your attention to.
I think it does offer a good insight into our culture, that we are so reluctant to give up any comfort or distraction, if it is even just a little bit uncomfortable to do so.
Joe as usual you wrote a brilliant post,on a blog even.But what I might like to remind other B/R's is with halloween coming,I totally plan on using your wifes Peanut Brittle recipe and eating it all myself as you don't want to give unwrapped candy to kids(they can eat the crappy candy corn)but I just wanted to comment on going to Margos blog(first time ever)and already I like her style.Keep up the good work Joe.Keep up the good work Margo....
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said, "And then think that these guys aren't nearly as big or strong as NFL players."
ReplyDeleteWatch some of the rugby on Setanta or Fox Soccer Plus. There are plenty of monsters on the pitch.
That said, I do wonder how their injuries compare to American football.
It is the nature of the game, as it and the equipment have developed. Making the field larger, as the players have become larger and faster and stronger, might help a little. . . .
ReplyDeleteWe should ask ourselves if all the money and time spent on this activity could not be better directed to some other part of the economy, and if there are not sufficient other ways to entertain ourselves.
And I loved to play touch football, and I was good at it.
I heard after an NFL game, a Chicago researcher had checked Brian Urlacher's CPK.
ReplyDeleteCPK is a marker of muscle breakdown. In trauma scenarios and crush injuries its used to monitor the potential to go into rhabdomyolisis, where the muscle component will essentially clog your kidneys and cause renal failure. Too high and you have to try to encourage flow and urine production. Dark or pink urine is the hallmark clinical finding. IV fluids and alkanization of urine with bicarb are ways prevent the kidney complications. Its rare to see levels greater than 2000-3000 after typical traumas. Levels greater than 5000 are concerning situations, where close monitoring is necessary.
Brian Urlacher's CPK level was over 6000.
Although a year old, this is still one of the best articles I've read about the NFL:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.gq.com/sports/profiles/200909/nfl-players-brain-dementia-study-memory-concussions
There is plenty of evidence that the NFL STILL doesn't care about concussions. Perhaps these new rules are a way to make up for that.
And to say an NFL player shouldn't care about being hurt is like saying that a solider shouldn't care about being shot, since they're both getting paid for it.
ReplyDeleteLots of good points in these comments - like non team oriented medicos at each game, and insisting the proper way to tackle at pro level (they already teach the correct way to tackle at every level up to college - when the money that can be made starts to lead to more dramatic "tackles").
ReplyDeleteI even understand Urlacher's angst about the issue and at least he didnt seem to come off as just bloodthirsty - unlike Harrison who does just that and is clearly unrepentant.
As for the "NFL gave me a helmet and I'm going to use it" comment - that should bring a fine and suspension right now since the NFL rules say you are not supposed to lead with the helmet.
Like Ryan above I see no hypocrisy in loving the big collisions while penalizing the illegal ones. I've seen plenty of big hits out of bounds or after the whistle or after the QB released the ball which got called and didn't bother me in the slightest.
Right now, helmet to helmet is supposed to be illegal - seems simple to me
Growing up on Brian Dawkins i have always liked the violence. This year though, perhaps because I am getting older, or maybe because I've dedicated less time to football this year (Go Phillies), but this year has kind of sickened me. 6 Eagles concussions. Stewart Bradley trying to stand up and staggers back to the ground is as ugly as you'll see. Meanwhile, a new starting QB every week just serves as a constant reminder of injuries.
ReplyDeleteAdmit it NFL lovers. We're animals. We're in for the violence and we love it.
ReplyDeleteBe proud and honest shout it to the world "FROM A SAFE DISTANCE I LOVE SEEING OTHER PEOPLE HIT OTHER PEOPLE".
and then go to church and be smug and clean. We're animals. Love it.
Anonymous (October 21, 2010 11:07 AM) said...
ReplyDelete'And lots and lots of injuries. Google "Rugby broken neck" sometime. And then think that these guys aren't nearly as big or strong as NFL players.'
First you have to distinguish between rugby union and rugby league. A lot of broken necks in union occur in collapsing scrums, which are a blight on the game. They also happen when a tackler uses poor technique.
Rugby league is a violent game, no question. But the head is off limits and any transgressions there are dealt with severely, both on the field and at subsequent hearings.
From what I've seen of the NFL, one of its most glaring shortcomings is turning up to play with something like 50 players. Defenders have one job, smack the opposition, then they're off. So huge men are chosen; fellas who'd probably be next to useless as attackers.
Rugby league is a 13-man game with each team allowed 17 players. Up to 12 substitutions can be made in an 80-minute game.
The same guys who attack have to defend.
The other drawback with NFL is that every time a tackle is made, play stops while a committee meeting is held. If the play carried on immediately, as it does in both forms of rugby, fewer men would be committed to the tackle.
On the odd times I watch NFL I am completely bemused by the sight of a tackle being followed by a gigantic pile-up as every player on the tackling side seems to rush in and add his body to the mass. What the hell is that all about. Tackle the man, get up and get on with the game.
I'll let the "aren't nearly as big and strong" comment go. Except to say, these guys have the strength to remain on the pitch for the duration of the game. They are also strong enough to take a hit without being togged out like a Star Wars stormtrooper.
I agree that because there is undeniable evidence that players will suffer horrific consequences later in life, the league should take drastic measures to implement safer play as soon as realistically possible. Think a health and safety task force during the pending lockout that examines every facet of the issue, from intent to injure (Harrison's hit) receiving immediate suspension and fines, to shifting to a safer helmet. Maybe congress should step in and pass a law mandating football at all organized levels comply with these measures.
ReplyDeleteRegardless of how the league feels about it, this will take little of the glamor and excitement away from football and believe me, people will still pour billions of dollars into America's favorite sport. Players won't care; it's not like they're going to refuse to play because the league has taken common sense safety measures.
Finally, if nothing else, there needs to be harsh penalties for "intent to injure hits" (in-game, post-game) right now. Regardless of whether it's flagged on the field, if there is video evidence that a player closed in to hit another player in a dangerous way, that player (and his team) should pay. Look at what the NHL does; in hockey hard hits are the norm and people love it. But in the NHL everyone recognizes that there are hits that are part of the game and hits that are cheap, retributive shots intended to injure (and in some notable cases, maim or kill). You know what the NHL does to these players? They crush them with significant suspensions. Although this policy leads to some controversy and is not always fairly (or sensibly adjucated), it goes a long way to keeping that league's players much safer than they would otherwise be.
I did not think either Harrison hit was dirty. On the Cribbs hit, he was basically throwing himself into a group of 3 players, something which happens on many running plays. Cribbs helmet was lower than his, and hit his shoulder pad. He actually had more of a chance of injuring himself on that play. The Massaquoi hit was actually a good tackle. He stood straight up he pushed out with his arms, he did not lower his head. The fact that the receiver was leading with his head caused their helmets to collide. The fine and penalty on this was results based, rather than technique based, which is the wrong way to go about this.
ReplyDeleteThe hit on Desean Jackson, however, was a player leading with his helmet, head down. Jackson is just lucky the guy missed him with his head, because he was leading with the helmet, head down. A helmet to chin hit might have caused more damage. That one should have gotten a much bigger fine.
There are going to be injuries in the NFL. Some of them will come on big hits. But some of those hits will be merely circumstance-2 people moving at a high rate of speed in opposite directions. If Harrison had tried to step out of the way and arm tackle Massaquoi, he would have been berated for a poor tackle that could have led to a Browns TD.
You can't have it both ways. If you don't penalize by form and intent, you may as well make it a flag game.
If a player leads with his helmet, maybe he should be tossed out of the game, suspended for a couple games, and fined a substantial sum of money. They can even use replay to confirm the ejections.
ReplyDeleteTossing players out of games, or suspending them, will get the attention of the coaches at least.
The NFL cares about stopping violence hits in the same way RJ Reynolds cares about preventing kids from smoking.
ReplyDeleteTheir whole business model depends on it.
While I understand the rationale behind the comment that the NFL's "whole business model depends on" big hits, I simply don't think this is true. The NFL's business model depends on excitement, and the Desean Jackson and Josh Cribbs injuries take arguably the most exciting players on two teams off the field for at least next week (as well as potentially shortening their careers and making it more likely that they will suffer similar injuries in the future).
ReplyDeleteCertainly part of the excitement of watching these two men work their magic is the potential for them to be creamed on any play (the presence of potential danger always makes the present more exciting), but I think the number of fans who turn away from the game when they feel there are no players capable of producing exciting plays is far greater than the number of fans who would stop watching if defensive players were forced to aim their tackles at the bodies of opposing players rather than their heads. For the Browns, especially, without Cribbs there are very few offensive (or special teams) players on that team capable of "wow" plays on that team. If I'm a Browns fan, there may be very little getting me excited for the game next week without the excitement of watching Joshua Cribbs, a lack of interest that costs the NFL viewers and revenue.
One quick question: Would Harrison be able to hold his place in the league as an offensive player?
ReplyDeleteThe NFL could simply require players to wrap when they tackle. Problem mostly solved.
ReplyDeleteHey Joe,
ReplyDeleteI like this piece because, as you so often do, you simply walk through (with great ability of course) the exact thoughts that most rational people are having. Early on I got excited wondering which side you would ultimately land on. And of course, you didn't land on a side, which is the point.
For most of this argument I have agreed with Mike Greenberg (I listen to alot of Mike and Mike) who, to the face of many ex-players who are arguing the other side, says that the league has to do SOMETHING. Yes it's not perfect, and yes there are times when the defender can't really control what's hitting what, but ultimately maybe that doesn't matter. Results matter, and someone has to be accountable.
But on the other hand, every player chooses to play in the NFL (and of course there are 1000s of players who want to play in the NFL but don't get the opportunity). They know the risks and they accept them.
The NFL is present a product to fans that clearly works, and until fans stop supporting it, I'm guessing nothing will fundamentally change. For a couple years now I've been little by little losing my interest in football in favor of baseball (maybe it's being a Bengals fan that does me in). This might be the straw that drives me away for good.
Should have signed in before posting that last one...
ReplyDeleteThat's why I watch rugby :D.
ReplyDeleteI think the point is being missed.
ReplyDeleteWe love violence. One only has to look at the response to full contact, kick the groin, type sports, Nascar crashes, hockey fights, beanballs, Octagons and dog fighting to understand what drives ratings.
I long for the return of fight to the death gladiatorial contests or maybe we could have the state of Texas televise their next execution.
It's amazing to me that the article and none of the comments mention the scenario that would finally put the NFL in a position where something would be done. A death on the field. I watched while Kenjon Barner of the Oregon Ducks lay there after taking a hit to the head against Washington State. Motionless for five minutes. We've all seen such many times, this is the most recent for me and why I mention it in particular.
ReplyDeleteIf something is not done and I support the new emphasis it is inevitable that someone will get killed while playing in a game. But not. one. person. mentions it.
What makes you think that the NFL cares about anything except profits. They have always treated players like expendable pieces of meat.
ReplyDelete"I would never try to hurt someone with a vicious tackle."
ReplyDelete-Asante Samuels
This is all about spearing, which has NEVER been legal. Launching head-first into guys, which is an idiotic tackling technique anyway, is practiced routinely.
ReplyDeleteAlthough the Massoquoi hit looked bad, I still think the Cribbs one was worse. He lowered his head, led with his helmet, and aimed for Cribbs' helmet. Cribbs was almost stopped anyway, so Harrison had plenty of time to line up that hit.
The level of stupidity of James Harrison (and other tacklers) is just amazing. Don't they know they are putting themselves at a much higher risk of injury by using the helmet as a weapon? Morons.
Bottom line is if you can't play defense without launching into people helmet-first, then you suck at football. Learn how to tackle.
And did anyone catch the RealSports segment on ALS sufferers (Lou Gehrig's disease). Watch what state former Raiders fullback Steve Smith has been reduced to as a result of ALS, which is caused by head trauma in most cases.
LC Greenwood?
ReplyDeleteYeah, LC Greenwood. Come on, man.
ReplyDeleteAlso Rod Woodson played about twice as many games at corner as he did at safety.
Anonymous said, "I love football. I live and die with the Green Bay Packers every week. But I can't help but wonder if pro football is really something we can conscionably condone in society."
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely. That's exactly how I feel, except replace "Packers" with "49ers".
Meanwhile, my jaw dropped when I read Urlacher saying that a knee injury was worse than a concussion. That's... absolutely asinine.
I think you just wrote about why football is a stupid sport. Because it's really just about hitting people.
ReplyDeleteJoe, your piece about Cliff Lee reminded me why I'm a baseball fan. This post reminded me... why I'm a baseball fan.
ReplyDeleteThis is why I don't want my kids to play football.
ReplyDeleteI remember watching a program many years ago where the reporter showed current running backs (I only remember Jerome Bettis for sure) footage of how RBs from 20 years ago (30 years ago now, at least) fare today. No matter how much we pretty it up, these guys suffer the equivalent of high-speed car accidents over and over again during the course of a game, and even for the toughest guys out there, those hits build up.
ReplyDeleteI'll never forget the look on The Bus's face as he watched that 60-something man try to get out of bed and into a wheelchair in the morning, only to be wheeled into physical therapy just so he might be able to get out of the chair for a while that day. I guarantee that, if Bettis ever once thought he was immortal, he lost that feeling right then. He said something along the lines of "Man, I'mma retire tomorrow", and he was joking, but he looked sick.
And he didn't retire. Not for years.
I love the game. I admire the men who play it. I admire their tenacity, their physical strength, the strength of their will, their ability to instantly size up an offensive or defensive formation and adjust their own accordingly, to react in a microsecond. I LOVE this game.
But sometimes, I feel a little like a Roman at the Coliseum, cheering for the wild animals to eat the nameless slave faster so we can get to another fight, already.
Joe, I had a entry about this on my blog, which was posted to the WordPress Freshly Pressed page, so I got a lot of hits and a lot of feedback. Most of the people agreed with me -- that is, they agreed that players no longer tackle with the proper form. Form tackling is sounder technique and, I believe anyway, would reduce some of these helmet to helmet hits. Anyway, as I said, most people agree with me, but some didn't and those folks implied that the game would be less popular without that hitting. I don't believe that would be the case. Football is a wonderful game, and much more than the sum of all its collisions. But, if it's true that the NFL would lose viewers if there are fewer devastating hits -- well then, I'm very sad for American sports fans.
ReplyDeleteWell said. I wonder if there is any way to really fix this? The fines the NFL hands out are like restrictor plates in NASCAR, merely a band aid that doesn't address the real problem. Less padding? More padding? Put weights on their ankles? Stop watching? Surely a longer NFL is a really, really bad idea.
ReplyDelete"Well said. I wonder if there is any way to really fix this?"
ReplyDeleteYes, there is.
First-up, this is an 11-man game. So, restrict each team to a game-day roster of 14 players.
Then, restrict each team to ten substitutions per game.
What this will do is remove from the game those players whose only skill is to hit people. It will also remove those players whose only skill is high speed and catching. If you don't have all-round ability you're not worth your place. Need someone to punt or place kick? Hand the ball to an on-field player. Whistling up a specialist for one small task is the antithesis of sport.
Next, take all that armour off. You think someone's going to lead with his head if it's not encased in a hollowed-out bowling ball? Think again.
Get rid of time-outs. Keep the play constant. That way, players with high levels of fitness will shine.
There are a few other things, but those will do for starters.
Will anything happen, though?
Of course not.
why???
ReplyDelete