So here's what I was thinking about the other day ... why is it important that a professional sports coach or manager (especially in baseball) be a former player? In baseball, as I have already written here, at least 80% of the managers in baseball played in the big leagues, and just about every player was a star ballplayer at some reasonably high level*.
*Even Buck Showalter, who takes more than his share of heat as a non-player, hit .324 one year in Class AA one year and struck out only 24 times in 615 plate appearances.
In the NBA, by my quick count, 22 of the 30 coaches who ended the season last year with teams played in the NBA. And in basketball, unlike baseball, many of the greatest players ever -- Larry Bird, Isiah Thomas, Bob Cousy, Dave Cowens, Bill Russell, Dan Issel, Bob Lanier, even Wilt Chamberlain briefly while playing -- have tried their hand at coaching. Few of the all-time great baseball players, especially in recent years, have become managers.
In the NHL, I count 21 of the 30 coaches as former NHL players though remarkably some of the best hockey names in coaching -- Guy Boucher, Peter DeBoer, Barry Trotz -- did not play in the NHL. They did play hockey at high levels, though,
So the question is: Why? Why is it that playing the sport at a high level is widely viewed as a prerequisite for becoming a coach those three sports? I think you could come up with a million reasons if you want, but I have chosen three:
1. Players' respect. There's a sense among general managers and owners that players will be more likely to respect and follow a manager who has played at or near the highest level (or maybe the converse is more true: That players are more likely NOT to respect and follow a manager who has not played at or near the highest level). Pro sports, people will often tell you, are about people. These are not tabletop games -- I cannot tell you how many times I've heard that while writing about sports. And so, to earn the players respect (the thinking goes) you need that history as a player.
2. A sense of understanding. There's a sense among many that to understand the game at the extreme heights necessary to coach the game, you need to have played it very well. This is why 72.4% of the nasty emails I get contain the phrase "Did you ever play?" Obviously, sports understanding is 1,000 times more important for coaches than for sportswriters, and and the sense among many is that you need to have been in those situations. You need to have been on the court with the game on the line, or in Game 148 with your body aching, or on the ice in the heat of the playoffs.
3. A natural connection between playing and coaching. Anyway the connection seems natural in those sports. While baseball (through gritted teeth) has come to accept various highly educated General Managers who never played baseball above high school (if there), the idea a non-playing MANAGER being hired still seems jarring to the mind. And most people will tell you it couldn't work. The idea of someone like Bill Belichick -- a low-level college football player who basically learned the game by studying film in his father's basement -- becoming a baseball manager is simply foreign to the mind.
And that leads us to the point: None of my three reasons have any effect on football. Below, I've ranked the 32 NFL coaches as players ... and I should say that it was almost impossible to do because I HAVE NO IDEA how good a player most of these guys really were. That's because only five coaches of the 32 had real NFL careers (two more were NFL replacement in 1987). Only a handful beyond that had even remotely memorable college careers. One coach never played football at all -- he really did want to be a professional golfer. Another almost died on a football field in college and never played another down. There are more coaches in the NFL from Wesleyan College than from Notre Dame, Ohio State, Michigan, Texas, Alabama, Georgia, USC, Oklahoma and Nebraska combined. And there are more coaches from Eastern Illinois than Wesleyan College.
So how do you explain it? NFL coaches certainly must demand respect. How do they do it without playing in the league? NFL coaches certainly need to have that understanding of the sport -- how do they gain it if they never played at the highest level? Football, you would think as much as any sport, should have that strong connection between playing and coaching. But in the NFL playing in the league is certainly no prerequisite ... as you will see below only five NFL head coaches legitimately played in the NFL (two seem to have had brief careers as replacement players in 1987). Frankly, when you look hard at the coaches who get hired, you would think that having played in the NFL would be a negative on your resume.
Bill Walsh didn't play a down in the NFL -- he (like many NFL coaches) became a graduate assistant while pursuing a Masters degree. Dick Vermeil followed the same path. Marv Levy didn't play in the NFL -- he went to Harvard for graduate work in English history. Jim Mora didn't play in the NFL -- he joined the Marines. Bill Parcells didn't play in the NFL, though he actually was drafted in the seventh round out of Wichita State. Jimmy Johnson didn't play in the NFL, though he was part of the great 1964 Arkansas team as a player. And so on. Even Vince Lombardi didn't play in the NFL (though it was a fledgling league then, and Lombardi was one of the famed Seven Blocks of Granite at Fordham).
And so on. Though some of the great NFL coaches -- Don Shula, Tom Landry, Chuck Noll, Bill Cowher and others -- did play in the NFL, it almost seemed beside the point. The NFL decision makers (and in many ways the NFL decision makers alone) had come to see coaching football as a completely different career track from playing football.
It's fascinating to me that football is like this and has been like this for so long. You would think, from an outsiders view, that football would be the MOST insular of sporting worlds not the LEAST. Football seems so regimented, so stuck in its ways ... but when it comes to hiring coaches owners and general managers are almost bizarrely open-minded and revolutionary. When Scott Pioli, who had so much success in New England, took over Kansas City and went looking for a coach, he hired a man who had never played football on ANY level, a man who wanted to be a professional golfer, Todd Haley, And while the jury is still out on Haley -- and while former running back Larry Johnson did call out Haley on Twitter -- the Chiefs have made strides in 2010 and it seems to me that kind of hire would be almost impossible in baseball.
OK, so now here are all 32 coaches loosely ranked 1-32 as players.
1. Mike Singletary (San Francisco): Absolutely no question who is in the top spot. He was, of course, a Hall of fame linebacker, and the anchor of the legendary 1985 Bears defense.
2. Jack Del Rio (Jacksonville): A pretty clear No. 2 choice as well. Del Rio had an eleven year pro career, with the Kansas City Chiefs, Cowboys and Vikings, and he made one Pro Bowl in 1994. He might be best known for his staunch pro-union stance -- he was so pro-union he was once photographed with a shotgun while in a picket line, and he got into a brief skirmish with Chiefs legend Otis Taylor, who was serving as a scout at the time.
3. Ken Whisenhunt (Arizona): He was a sturdy NFL tight end for the Atlanta Falcons -- he started from 1986-88 and caught 53 passes over those three years.
4. Gary Kubiak (Houston): He played his entire career as a backup to John Elway in Denver, which is not a bad way to make a living. He did start five games, and he had some talent. His senior year he led the SW Conference in touchdown passes at Texas A&M.
5. Jeff Fisher (Tennessee): He was a star defensive back at USC, and he actually played 49 games for the Chicago Bears, mostly on special teams. He had one punt return for a touchdown.
6. Lovie Smith (Chicago): Well, we're all done with our non-replacement NFL players. That's it: FIVE guys played in the NFL, two made Pro Bowls. The ranking definitely gets trickier from here. Smith played linebacker and safety at Tulsa and was chosen a second-team All American by the AP in 1978.
7. Wade Phillips (Dallas ... at least as I type this): He was a three-year starter at the University of Houston where it was said that he set a school record for tackles.
8. Tom Coughlin (New York Giants): He set the Syracuse record passing yards, though -- through no fault of his own -- he was by far the least successful player in the Orangeman backfield when he played (he played in the backfield with TWO future Pro Football Hall of Famers, Larry Czonka and Floyd Little). Coughlin is old enough that when he played, his position was called "Wingback."
9. Marvin Lewis (Cincinnati): He was a very good linebacker at Idaho State -- making first-team All-Big Sky three times.*
*This has nothing to do with anything -- and I hesitate to tell this little story because people might think I'm making fun the Big Sky conference and I absolutely not. They play good and fun football in the Big Sky, and they absolutely should have All-Conference teams. But I do think these "All-Whatever Teams" can get carried away. One year my good friend Chuck Culpepper was covering the Great Alaska Shootout, and he was pondering whether to put a guy on first-team All-Great-Alaska Shootout. He was asking me about it, and it suddenly hit me and I found myself asking him what I thought was a rather remarkable question: "Do you mean there's a SECOND TEAM All-Great Alaska Shootout?" It turns out, there was.
10. Tom Cable (Oakland): He was a star offensive lineman for University of Idaho. It has been written in several places that he was briefly a Colts replacement player in 1987, though I cannot find any official record of it. That little tidbit, though, is actually included in his official Raiders biography ("he spent one year with the Colts") which is surprising since the Raider tend to keep just about everything, including their last eight seasons, as hush-hush as possible.
11. Sean Payton (New Orleans). Payton was DEFINITELY a replacement player -- he played in three games for the Chicago Bears in '87, completing 8 of 23 passes. What does it say about the NFL that not one but TWO replacement players are head coaches? Payton was apparently a very good quarterback at that hotbed for NFL coaches, Eastern Illinois.
12. Mike Tomlin: (Pittsburgh). He played wide receiver at William & Mary, and was a good player there. He had school record with 20 touchdown receptions. He was good enough there that he has his own YouTube video.
13. Jim Caldwell (Indianapolis). He was a four year starter as defensive back at Iowa, which is not quite as impressive as it sounds. Iowa was struggling quite a bit then. The Hawkeyes went 0-11 one of this seasons. But teammates say he was a good player.
14. Andy Reid (Philadelphia): Offensive lineman at BYU. Apparently, according to his own bio, one of his quirks as a player is that at the same time he was a writing a column for the Provo Daily Herald and, yes, that he loved Jim Murray and dreamed of writing at Sports Illustrated. Maybe we could change jobs for a day or something.
15. Chan Gailey (Buffalo): He was a three year letterman at quarterback for University of Florida. I'm not sure how much he played. I do know two things (1) He ran the wishbone; (2) He IS an Eagle Scout. I mention this last bit because once in writing a story about Gailey I mentioned that Gailey WAS an Eagle Scout. I heard from half of the world's Eagle Scouts who alerted me that once you are an Eagle Scout you are ALWAYS an Eagle Scout, there is no past tense there, it is a lifelong title.
16. Mike Smith (Atlanta): Well, the rankings keep getting trickier and trickier as I get less and less information to work with. Smith was a linebacker at East Tennessee State, and was good enough to twice be named team MVP. I've also seen that he played briefly in the CFL.
17. John Fox (Carolina): He played defensive back at San Diego State with Herm Edwards, and Herm said he was a good player. But now that I think of it, Herm always said it in sort of a semi-serious "Oh, John was a good player, yeah, good player" kind of way, so I don't know.
18. Norv Turner (San Diego): Here we are, barely even halfway through the list, and already we're talking about backup college players. Turner was a three-year letterman at Oregon though if he's known for anything there as a player it is for backing up a pretty decent quarterback named Dan Fouts.
19. Pete Carroll (Seattle): He played free safety at University of the Pacific and was good enough to win All-Conference honors.
20. Eric Mangini (Cleveland). He was a nose tackle at Wesleyan University, and it says that he holds the single season and career sack records there. I have no idea what to make of this information except that he was a better player than Bill Belichick.
21. John Harbaugh (Baltimore). He was a defensive back at Miami University, the cradle of coaches. The word I've heard is that he was a talented player who had his career slowed by a nasty knee injury.
22. Mike McCarthy (Green Bay). I'm not sure how good a tight end Mike McCarthy was at Baker University, but he certainly takes great pride in the school. He and the Packers have more than once made generous donations to Baker.
23. Jim Schwartz (Detroit): A story about Schwartz at Georgetown's own Web Site does not go into any detail about how good a player he was ... only that he "played linebacker." Hmm. The story does say that he's an avid chess player*, and he uses lots of statistics in his coaching.
24. Josh McDaniels (Denver). He played some quarterback and some wide receiver at John Carroll. Hard to find any information about how good a player he was.
25. Raheem Morris (Tampa Bay): He was a safety at Hofstra -- that's about all any of the bios about Morris say. No idea how much he played.
26. Tony Sparano (Miami): He did start at center for the University of New Haven ... and the training center is named for him, though I suspect not because of his play. He was a successful coach at New Haven, twice coaching the team into the Division II playoffs.
27. Bill Belichick (New England): He played center and tight end at Wesleyan University. but football was probably not his best sport. He was captain of the lacrosse team his senior season.
28. Rex Ryan (New York Jets): He was a defense end at Southwestern Oklahoma State University. Hard to tell how much or how well he and his twin brother Rob played, but apparently they raised enough hell that at least once their father, Buddy, was called to bail them out of jail.
29. Mike Shanahan (Washington): He was a quarterback at Eastern Illinois, but he suffered a horrible injury during the spring game -- he ended up losing a kidney, doctors at the time said his life was in danger. He obviously never played again.
30. Brad Childress (Minnesota): Talk about eerie. Childress was a quarterback who transferred from Illinois to Eastern Illinois, though he never played a down at Eastern Illinois... because he suffered career-ending injury before the season began. That makes TWO NFL coaches who not only went to Eastern Illinois but had their careers ended by freak injuries.
31. Steve Spagnuolo (St. Louis): He was a starting wide receiver at Springfield College. Hard to tell how good a player he was, but he was a good enough student that he won the school's male scholar-athlete award his senior year.
32. Todd Haley (Kansas City): He never played football -- his connection to football was through his father, Dick Haley, who was one of the architects of the Steel Curtain Steelers of the 1970s. Dick Haley, it should be said, DID play in the NFL. Todd wanted to be a golf pro, and while there are no coaches who played FOOTBALL at the University of Miami, Todd did play golf at the U.
#30 is sketchy. Most in the state of Minn. would argue that the coach did indeed play college football, at Southern Miss, and won a few MVP awards in the NFL.
ReplyDeleteMaybe NFL coaches actually make a difference. Because of this, you can't just put some figurehead former star at the helm lest you risk complete and utter disaster.
ReplyDeleteIsn't the discrepancy likely tied into the level of micromanagement required to run a football team? Almost every story I've read about NFL coaches stresses the tremendously long hours that they put in, to the exclusion of almost everything else.
ReplyDeleteIn turn that ties up with the nature of the game itself. With football, every down is a chance to reset - to alter the players on the field, their formation, to call one of hundreds of plays that all have primary & secondary goals depending on what the defence try to counter with. And that's just for the offence.
Compare that with baseball. When a new hitter steps up to the plate there's really not that much the coach/manager can do. Bunt? Hit & run? Swing for the fences?
I imagine it would take a really, REALLY special individual to go through the brutal training regime and the long, painful climb to get to and stay at the top rung of professional football...and then be able to put in the time and energy to handle the colossal amount of data that a head coach has to be able to process, especially when you'd be in competition with up and coming coaches who had dedicated their entire lives to the minutiae (sp?) of the game.
SJ
It seems to me that the reason the NFL is more likely to hire non-players is that it's the league where the coach most affects the team success.
ReplyDeletea) MLB teams are more likely to hire popular ex-player X because the PR benefit outweighs the marginal win benefit of hiring a better coach who has a non-traditional background.
b) MLB teams are more likely to hire ex-minor leaguer X who has been with the organization a long time because the familiarity benefit outweighs the marginal win benefit of hiring a better coach who has a non-traditional background.
Consciously or unconsciously of course, much like marginal NHL players are more likely to be anglophone Canadians.
Love the article Joe. As a Brit, I'd also note that soccer doesn't seem to require any previous success as a player (e.g. Arsene Wenger and especially Jose Mourinho).
ReplyDeleteThe two things I'd suggest that make a huge difference why you see non-pros managing in Football (and soccer) vs. Baseball/Basketball are:
1). Apprenticeships
There are ways for good non-player coaches to prove they're good in soccer/football. In Football, the most obvious is being a great offensive/defensive coordinators is a great way to put yourself in the frame for a head coaching job (and being a great LB coach/QB coach is a good step along the rung). There is no equivalent in baseball/basketball -- being a good A/AA manager isn't necessarily a good indicator of being a good coach (it may just be having a stocked system, etc).
Secondly, while there's a difference -- I'd wager college football coaching (and offensive co-ords etc) are more akin to NFL coaching, than being a college basketball coach is to an NBA coach (given how much of being a good college bb coach is recruiting). Like the lower leagues in soccer, it provides another way for someone to work their way up the chain and prove their talent.
2). Scope of the role: A football coach (and especially a soccer manager) has some to the typically (in basketball/baseball) GM-like responsibilities folded into their roles. This gives those with other skills (and without the initial 'players respect' of being a former player, a way to earn their credentials, and the players respect on account of being a great coach somewhere beforehand)
Could it because football is so specialized? A second baseman might feel that a former catcher has been through an experience relevant to his own ... and a center might feel that a former point guard has been through an experience relevant to his own... but a tight end doesn't really feel that a former linebacker has been through an experience relevant to his own?
ReplyDeleteWhy should we be surprised? Every weekend millions of fans seem to think they have the right stuff to coach an NFL team. Or any other professional team for that matter.
ReplyDeleteObviously, the owners are listening.
(Tongue planted in cheek).
Perhaps it has something to do with how the game developed? That might be an interesting angle to consider. Was baseball typically managed by players from its earliest days (player-manager)? Was football typically coached by men with little or no playing experience? Or is it something that developed over time?
ReplyDeletePardon me for picking nits, and also for being a little Chicago-centric, but "Though some of the great NFL coaches -- Don Shula, Tom Landry, Chuck Noll, Bill Cowher and others -- did play in the NFL, it almost seemed beside the point."
ReplyDeleteIt has nothing to do with the main contention of your essay, but I would like to quote from the venerable source, Wikipedia regarding one George S. Halas -"Halas not only played end (wide receiver on offense, defensive end on defense) but also handled ticket sales and the business of running the club; lore says he even sold tickets before the game. All of that perhaps not being enough to do, Halas also coached the team. Named to the NFL's all-pro team in the 1920s, his playing highlight occurred in a 1923 game when he stripped Jim Thorpe of the ball, recovered the fumble, and returned it 98 yards — a league record which would stand until 1972."
How does Halas get tossed into the "and others" category as a great player/coach? He helped start the damn league. Also, I believe one Iron Mike Ditka or "Da Coach" had a pretty good career as a player and I believe is still the only person to win a Super Bowl as a player and coach.
Other than that, I got nothin'.
The other coaching positions seem to have more former players in them. Defensive Coordinators in general, at least until recently, had some pretty prestigious players. Emmitt Thomas, Ray Rhodes (briefly a HC), Tony Dungy (a long time HC obviously).
ReplyDeleteJohn Madden is another coach that got drafted but had a career-ending injury before he got into coaching.
This is perhaps an uninformed comment, but could the violent nature of football play a part in this? Given all the talk about head injuries and some of the lasting effects of them, and taking into account the highly developed and intelligent game plans that need to be created weekly, I wouldn't be surprised if all the hits involved in a long and successful NFL career were somewhat of a factor.
ReplyDeleteWhat's always interested me about the NFL coaching fraternity is the "degrees of separation" and "family ties" involved. It seems like coaches are constantly being recycled from team to team and there's plenty of "favors" going on - whether it be due to the lucrative pension involved, I dunno. But I don't think there are too many mainstream sports where fairly nondescript sons of "famous" fathers can become head coaches (Wade Phillips, Rex Ryan, John Harbaugh, Todd Haley, etc.).
ReplyDeleteA football coach is nothing like a baseball team manager, hockey coach, or basketball coach.
ReplyDeleteI have neither the time nor mantellect to present the supporting evidence, but I would suggest this:
a)in the salary-cap era, teams have (roughly) the same player-talent.
b)the salary cap doesn't apply to the coaching staff.
c)football coaches (and their support staff) have a tremendous impact on the game.
(a+b+c)=the modern NFL coaching staff is the difference between one team's success and another's lack thereof.
In those other sports the coach-figure either a)doesn't matter, or b)doesn't matter as much as the players AND the difference in player-quality between teams is fluid and significant.
If there were no cap in the NFL, all the Parcellichiks in the world couldn't beat Peyton Manning's Redskins.
Don't take this the wrong way — I love your writing and I know this is a free "hobby" blog — but this column could really benefit from some proofreading.
ReplyDelete"What does it say about the NFL that not one but TWO replacement players are head coaches?"
ReplyDeleteIs there a weaker players' union in any other professional sport? Anywhere?
Ditka was a good coach for a couple of years.
ReplyDeleteI would agree that it seems inconceivable for a non-player to be hired as a baseball manager. In the NBA, however, though rare, it's possible - witness Lawrence Frank. I would note too that though Tom Thibodeaux played, it was in Division III - I doubt that we would find a baseball manager who hadn't played at a higher level than that. What basketball seems to have in common with football is that it is possible for a non-player to get hired by a college team as an assistant and then to work his way up from there - and having established his credentials as a coach, he can, if he has the leadership skills, gain the respect of the players. What basketball has in common with baseball is that the coach interacts closely on a daily basis with each player, and so while it may be POSSIBLE for a coach who never played to gain the respect of the players (and, for that matter, to be hired initially as an assistant), it would seem quite difficult. An NFL coach, by contrast, is more like a CEO; the position coaches deal directly with the players and report to the coordinators, who in turn report to the head coach, and so the players may respect the head coach for his football mind but the down and dirty interactions are likely to be with the assistants.
ReplyDeleteWhy are there so few outstanding pro football players coaching in the NFL? Let’s face it, very few kids grow up dreaming of being football coaches. Kids who love football dream of being All-Pro PLAYERS. Coaching is Plan B, for guys who aren’t good enough to make it as players.
ReplyDeleteNow, the sooner a young man figures out that he’s never going to be an elite player, the sooner he’ll turn seriously to Plan B. The sooner a guy understands and accepts that he’s not good enough to play in the NFL, the sooner he’ll start pursuing a career in coaching, and the sooner he’ll start doing the low-paying, low-prestige jobs that may eventually lead him to a head coaching position.
MOST of the NFL’s head coaches spent years toiling away in obscurity as running backs coaches or secondary coaches before working their way up to offensive or defensive coordinator jobs before they were considered for head coaching vacancies. Most spent at least a decade building up a resume; some spent SEVERAL decades doing that.
LaDainian Tomlinson MIGHT be smart enough and charismatic to make a great head coach, but he’s going to keep playing as long as he can. Let’s say he retires at 35. At that point, if he wanted to become a coach, he’d have to start by taking a HUGE pay cut and doing the grunt work of an assistant coach for some years. Would he be willing to do that, after being a millionaire? Unlikely. And in the meantime, hundreds of other 35 year old have been DOING that work for over a decade, and have built up the experience it takes to be a head coach.
Let’s try one other crude analogy- Harvey Penick was, arguably, the greatest golf teacher of all time. Was Harvey ever a great golfer himself? No! He had some small talent as a golfer and some natural aptitude for teaching, and he learned to be an outstanding instructor by doing years of unglamorous work as a teaching pro at various country clubs in central Texas.
ReplyDeleteNow, is it possible that Tiger Woods and Padraig Harrington would make excellent golf instructors? Sure, it’s possible. But they’re going to keep playing for as long as their bodies will let them. And after that, rich as they are, is it likely they’d decide to spend decades as teaching pros at country clubs in order to master teaching technique? Hardly!
The guys who become great instructors are the golfers who KNOW they’re not quite good enough to make it on the PGA tour, and turn to Plan B early in their lives.
It's the same in most sports. A weak hitting minor league infielder figures out early on that he's not going to make it to The Show as a player, and decides to try coaching/managing. A stellar player doesn't start thinking about managing until he's 37 and can't get around o na fastabll any more. By then, the weak-hiting infielder has put in years of grunt work as AA league manager, and is a more viable candidate the next time the big league club needs a skipper.
Hockey is a small fraternity, and most of their coaches have lived the life of a hockey player for many years-though not always at the highest level.
ReplyDeleteBasketball hires names for star value. A name coach sells tickets, and really in the NBA coaching is more about respect than x's and o's.
Baseball has a lot of minor leaguers and fringe players simply because their are so many dues to be paid, and stars don't want to pay them. Frank Robinson was a very underrated manger though. Baseball would probably profit from more stat guys and administrators. It has worked for the NFL.
Because in the NFL there are alot more decisions to be made, alot more plays to be called, and much which has to be delegated to subordinates that you must have a good relationship with, there are many more stat guys, offensive or defensive "geniuses" and the like. A football coach has to be a leader, a politician, a PR guy, an orator, someone who commands respect from those under him, etc.
A jack of all trades, with a focus film study and playbooks. Good ex players make good position coaches, but can't handle the top job.
I'd agree with the general gist of the comments -- coaching football is much, much harder than coaching basketball or especially baseball, so in baseball things like players' respect, understanding what it's like to play at the highest level dwarf the importance of strategy, whereas in football, it's the opposite. I think many knowledgeable baseball fans could rightly claim that they would do a better job of in-game strategic managing than Ron Gardenhire, Fredi Gonzales or Bob Geren, but I don't know how many football fans could say the same. There is so much detail that goes into every play and so little time to decide what play to run that I imagine it's just really, really difficult.
ReplyDeleteAlso, to pick a nit, you refer to a converse when you mean an inverse. Converse switches the hypothesis and conclusion (if x then y becomes if y then x), whereas inverse negates the hypothesis and conclusion (if x then y becomes if not x then not y).
Chuck Klosterman talked about the gap between how football is perceived ideologically and philosophically and how it operates in reality in one of the chapters of his 2009 book, "Eating the Dinosaur." The chapter was posted on ESPN's Page 2 almost one year ago.
ReplyDeletehttp://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=klosterman/091019
(And after posting something like that, I think its obvious to say that I recommend reading both the chapter and the book.)
Anonymous October 18, 2010 2:18 PM
ReplyDeletesaid...
"Don't take this the wrong way — I love your writing and I know this is a free "hobby" blog — but this column could really benefit from some proofreading."
Anonymous, the rest of us do our own proof reading as we go. Try it. I want Joe working on his next story or getting some sleep, not wasting his time mending minor typos.
1. Although I am a Bill James devotee (since the early 80's), I would agree with the notion that the most important aspect of a manager's (or coach's) job is the human side, i.e., dealing with the diverse personalities and problems on any squad. I strongly suspect Mr. James would agree.
ReplyDelete2. Can you imagine MLB players tolerating a former replacement player as a manager? Inconceivable.
3. Many more player personnel decisions in all sports are due to off-field reasons than the public imagines. No, it's not a tabletop game.
As an Eagles fan, let me just say: for the love of God, please don't swap jobs with Andy Reid for any period of time. Maybe Wade Phillips, though.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete@ electric -
ReplyDeleteI'm a Klosterman fan, and that is really a thought-provoking essay. the passage about how the NFL stays on message and is always just selling the game itself is particularly insightful and on-target.
However, I think Klosterman's premise here mostly ignores the fact that football has evolved into a much more coach-controlled game. He acknowledges this in the footnotes but cites the evolution of "choice routes" as a counter to this trend. I would say that development is trivial compared against the much larger trend of coaches micromanaging every aspect of the game.
And so, while Klosterman is right that football coaches are the most innovative, I think it's also true that what was always an authoritarian game has become EVEN MORE authoritarian, and that this has happened during an era in which society in general has become more obedient (excessively in my view) to the powers that be. Football communicates the perfect values for an era in which the powerful get to innovate and the pawns in the game are told to just follow orders and do their job. Not to be cynical; I say that as a huge fan of the game.
Andy Reid (Philadelphia): ... and dreamed of writing at Sports Illustrated. Maybe we could change jobs for a day or something.
ReplyDeleteThat's all we need - a Joe Pos column cutting off four sentences too soon because the head columnist can't manage the clock. :D
Played against Josh McDaniels his junior year at John Carroll in a JV game, if that tells you anything about how good he was there.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I think Klosterman's premise here mostly ignores the fact that football has evolved into a much more coach-controlled game.
ReplyDeleteIt also ignores the possibility (probability) that football goes through fads precisely because football coaches are so risk averse -- mostly, they just copy the last team that went to the Superbowl.
One factor that probably does drive innovation is the high rate of turnover -- an NFL team turns over its roster every four or five years.
Many of the current NFL coaches played college ball at second- or third-tier schools. These happen to be the same schools where entry-level coaching jobs are to be found. The top colleges hire successful coaches from those programs, and NFL teams hire assistant coaches from the college ranks.
ReplyDeleteIf you are playing college ball at Hofstra or Wesleyan, you already know that you will not play professional football. So, if you love the sport and have an interest in coaching, you're in a great position to make the contacts you'll need to get that first job, because you are there for four years.
In baseball, by contrast, the entry-level coaching jobs are in the low minors, but the major-league club actually hires for these positions. So, the people best positioned to get one of those entry-level jobs are those who have been in an organization for a while, which means having some sort of professional career.
So Eastern Illinois quarterbacks = NFL head coaches?
ReplyDeleteGuess that means Wade's replacement in Dallas is Tony Romo.
Curious where Herm Edwards would've fit on that list, though he hardly qualifies as a "great" coach.
Only 5 (maybe 4) NFL coaches were better football players than Hall of Fame golfer Hale Irwin.
ReplyDelete