Sunday, December 19, 2010

The Greinke Trade

A few years ago, Bill James told me something I had never thought about before but now think about all the time, especially after trades like this one: Every single baseball team has prospects. Every one. The best teams. The worst teams. The smartest teams. The dumbest teams. They all have prospects. Not only that -- every team has enough prospects to fill out a Top10 list. You never see a team's "Top 7 Prospects" list because the team did not not have enough to fill out 10. No. They all have 10.

Not only THAT but every year Baseball America puts out its wonderful and indispensable prospect handbook -- and every team has THIRTY prospects listed. Even the worst minor league system of the last 30 years will produce 30 prospects in the Baseball America book.

This is worth remembering. Sunday, the Milwaukee Brewers traded four young players -- all four, I think, still fit the definition of "prospect" -- to Kansas City for Zack Greinke. The Royals also moved one of my favorite blog topics, Yuniesky Betancourt, to Milwaukee in the deal. The Royals have now traded away or released three of my favorite blog topics -- Greinke, Betancourt and Brian Bannister. Hmm. It's almost like they don't want me writing about them anymore.*

*Though the Royals were nice enough to pick up Jeff Francoeur, who will probably inspire a post or two.



The Royals got prospects* from Milwaukee, but that in and of itself means nothing. See: Prospects mean nothing. Every team has them. The question from Kansas City's perspective is this: Did they get PLAYERS who can help them win? I have spent the day asking baseball friends that very question. The answers are mixed. This trade, from Kansas City's perspective, is complicated and foggy and, in the end, probably pretty unsatisfying (if you're a Royals fan). We'll get to all that in a minute.

*Technically, I suppose, Escobar and Cain might not fit the description of "prospect" because they both have enough Major League time that they will not be considered rookies in 2011. But I'm using the term loosely here as players you might expect to be significantly better as they mature and develop. Neither Escobar or Cain have proven anything on the big league level yet.

The trade from Milwaukee's perspective, I think, is easy to categorize. It is glorious. Yes, they did deal four interesting young players -- 24-year-old shortstop Alcides Escobar , 25-year-old (in April) centerfielder Lorenzo Cain, 23-year-old reliever Jeremy Jeffress and 21-year-old (in March) pitcher Jake Odorizzi -- and yes they now appear stuck with Yuni Betancourt as their every day shortstop, and yes their farm system is now utterly depleted (though I'll bet they still have 30 prospects in the Baseball America book).

But they got one of the best pitchers in baseball in Greinke, a pitcher who quite possibly will be more dominant in the National League without having to face the designated hitter and as many stacked lineups (also Greinke fashions himself quite a hitter and will now get to prove it).Greinke now gets together with my breakout pick of 2011 Yovani Gallardo*, the promising Shaun Marcum and the still sometimes good Randy Wolf. It's not the Phillies rotation by a longshot, but it's pretty darned good, and with a lineup that finished fourth in the NL in runs in 2010, they certainly come into the season as serious contenders in the NL Central.

*Hey, my last two breakout picks were Zack Greinke and Ubaldo Jimenez so in this, and this alone, I have a pretty good record.

Perhaps just as important: The Brewers are clearly serious about winning. They've got Prince Fielder coming up on the end of his contract. They have not been in the World Series in almost 30 years -- only Seattle, Pittsburgh and Cubs have had a longer drought (and the Washington Nationals if you count their Expos years). The win now approach can be deadly if you are not in the right position, but the National League Central is not a great division, the Brewers are just a couple of years removed from a 90-win season, and if they don't win they have no shot at keeping Fielder to go with Braun as one of the best back-to-back hitters in the league. Getting Greinke seems to me a pretty serious victory for the Brewers, especially when you consider they did not give up a single player who would have been on anybody's list of, say, the 25 or 50 or even 100 best young players in baseball.

And this is the point I'll keep coming back to as we move on to the Royals: Milwaukee didn't give up a single player likely to become a star. Zack Greinke is a star. He's under control at a pretty good price for two years. Of course things can happen. Greinke can get hurt. Greinke can disappoint. Greinke can not fit in. Or the Brewers may find that winning with Yuniesky Betancourt as an every day shortstop is no easy trick. But you always take your chances on a trade. This one seems to me very likely to be a huge victory for Milwaukee. That's the crux of my Milwaukee opinion.

The Royals side is quite a bit harder to break down. It begins with some recent history.

Over the last 10 or so years, the Royals have built up an annoying but predictable pattern. They develop a star player and then trade him away. This began in 2000 when the Royals traded away Johnny Damon. They had done many things to help Damon feel at home in Kansas City. They actually bought him a house in town. They made him their face in the community. In 2000, Damon led the league in runs scored and stolen bases. When the season ended, he made it clear that unless the Royals intended to make a huge financial commitment to build a winner, he did not want to stay. The Royals traded him away. Damon still gets booed when he comes to Kansas City.

Two years later, it was Jermaine Dye -- coming off the year when, improbably, he started the All-Star Game. It is hard to imagine a Royals player ever again starting the All-Star game. Oh it will happen, but who knows when? Dye was not a homegrown product -- he had come from Atlanta -- but he did find stardom in Kansas City. He too seemed about ready to price himself out. And just as that was about to happen, the Royals dealt him for Neifi Perez in what was probably the most disastrous trade in team history.

Finally, there was Carlos Beltran, probably the only true five tool player the Royals farm system has ever developed (though George Brett was certainly a complete player, and Bo Jackson was a phenomenon). Beltran could hit, hit with power, he's still the most successful base stealer in baseball history, he's won multiple Gold Gloves in center field. He made it clear that he intended to go with the best deal when he became a free agent. The Royals knew they weren't going to give him the best deal. They decided to trade him for a third baseman and a catcher -- they made this clear before making the trade. They ended up getting John Buck and Mark Teahen.

Why bring up that background? Because the bulk of Kansas City fans have lost faith in the system. They know, absolutely know, that as soon as a player gets good he will be traded. It is simply a fact of Kansas City life. And not only will he be traded, but he will be traded for players that average baseball fans have never heard of.

So ... the Greinke trade comes as no surprise in Kansas City. It also comes as no surprise that the four players they got in return are complete unknowns except to the most intense of baseball fans. The Royals will say that the four players are good prospects, and they have upside, and this may be true. In Kansas City, though, these words have mostly lost their meaning. The future has been Kansas City's promotional tool for a long time now. And yet the future never gets any closer.

I have spent much of Sunday talking to friends in baseball, getting scouting reports of the four players in the deal ... and individually all the players have both promise and rather obvious flaws:

-- Shortstop Alcides Escobar: He's a by all accounts a gifted athlete with above average speed and brilliant defensive ability. There are even those who think he will eventually hit. He was a good enough prospect last year that the Brewers dealt away J.J. Hardy and made him everyday shortstop. But in his first year, he did not hit a lick (.235/.288/.326). His 67 OPS+ -- well, not many hitters in baseball history have rebounded from that to have a good offensive career. Ozzie Smith did. Terry Pendleton did. Not many others. Escobar also did not put up especially good defensive numbers, if you put any stock in those. The upside for Escobar is as a superior defensive shortstop who will get on base enough to steal bases and be an offensive plus. But that's certainly no guarantee and his future is further clouded as numerous scouts question Escobar's work ethic and motivation.

-- Centerfielder Lorenzo Cain: Nobody questions Cain's motivation, he seems to be a terrific athlete with even better makeup. The two names I heard most often in comparison are Denard Span and Torii Hunter, a couple of Twins centerfielders who the Royals have jealously gawked at the last few years. Cain, though, turns 25 in April, and his minor league march has been slow and uneven and injury plagued. He has only played 22 games in Class AAA. He has shown absolutely no power and only average plate discipline. He has the speed and instincts to be a fabulous defensive center fielder, which he could really show off in the enormous outfield at Kauffman Stadium.

-- Right-handed pitcher Jeremy Jeffress has a great arm -- he has been clocked at 100, and he worked 94-to-98 mph. His problem has been control -- both on and off the field. He has twice been suspended for testing positive for marijuana. You can pass your own judgments on that, but at the very least the second positive test suggests a player who has not taken his career very seriously. One more positive test, and he's banned for life. And in the minors he walked 188 batters in 306 innings, though his command came on enough in 2010 that one baseball executive said it "improved dramatically." He appears to be a reliever now -- especially because he has not found an effective third pitch. You never know exactly how relievers with great stuff and questionable command will do.

-- Right-handed pitcher Jake Odorizzi is probably not worth spending too much time on right now -- he's still years away. He pitched well in Low A, and some of the people I spoke with like him, think he projects as a No. 3 starter. Others aren't excited by his stuff and think he will struggle as he moves up in competition. There's no telling for sure with a pitcher in Class A.

And so, those are the four guys -- and you probably notice the same thing I do: There are no potential stars in the group. Not one. Oh, someone like Cain could emerge as a star, but it would be a surprise. The Royals got two players who figure to start in 2011, and a reliever who could have a significant role in the bullpen too. So they will get some production out of this deal. But there's nothing exciting here. Zack Greinke is one of the most exciting pitchers in baseball. He's one of the most exciting pitchers ever developed in Kansas City. And he's gone.

There is definite logic behind what the Royals did. The Royals have the best minor league system in baseball -- that seems to be the unanimous opinion -- and so the plan is to be successful in 2012 and 2013. This trade helps fill in some missing pieces. The Royals were intensely weak defensively up the middle -- now with Escobar (assuming they can motivate him) and Cain, they have a chance to make up-the-middle defense a real strength. The Royals farm system is loaded with high-end power hitters to play the corners -- remember the names Mike Moustakas, Eric Hosmer and Wil Myers (who may still be a catcher but is more likely an outfielder) -- and so this move potentially gives the team speed that it otherwise lacks. The two arms they got can both be helpful and added to the truckload of good arms the Royals have in the minors. Royals GM Dayton Moore is a big believer that a team like Kansas City needs TOO MUCH young pitching because pitchers are so fragile, both from a health standpoint and a confidence standpoint.

So, from that point of view, it's easy to understand why the Royals made the trade. And it's easy to see what they hope to get out of it. There's no way to say right now that this is a BAD deal because if Escobar and Cain are good big league players for the next few years and key middle-of-the-field contributors, then the trade could work out fine.

But ... two days ago the Royals were on top of the baseball world. For once, they had a chip that nobody else had -- they had a young and talented pitcher with an affordable contract. They had rich teams out there with HUGE motivation to make a deal. The Yankees and Rangers had lost out in the Cliff Lee sweepstakes. The New York Mets should be desperate to make a push considering how good the Phillies look. The Toronto Blue Jays are desperate to stay tough in the most competitive division in baseball. And so on. The Royals, for one of the few times in the last decade or two, were in the eye of baseball's hurricane. They had what lots and lots of teams wanted.

And, from an outside perspective, there was no rush to make a trade. Yes, Zack Greinke had made it clear he wanted to be traded ... he even switched agents. But so what? The Royals have him under control for two years. Greinke would have had to understand -- and if not understand, certainly accept -- that the Royals were trying to get the best deal for him. Why deal him now? Why not let the price build and build, as it certainly would. Why make a deal without a potential superstar return? What was the hurry?

Certainly the Royals know more about the situation than anyone else. Maybe they were worried about Greinke causing problems if they waited too long. Maybe they were worried about how he would pitch in a Royals uniform this year. Maybe they knew Greinke would simply refuse to go to any of the teams that could offer them more than Milwaukee did, and so they made the best deal they could make.

But it's curious. And after the long history of Royals botching these sorts of trades -- though it should be said the previous deals were not Dayton Moore's -- there's a lot of room for doubt here. Kansas City got four prospects Sunday and they may work out. They may not. Everybody's got prospects. But now only Milwaukee has Zack Greinke.

51 comments:

  1. Why? Because the Royals are STUPID!!! That's why.

    The whole point of running a baseball team is to ACQUIRE players like Zach Greinke. It is a sad day when you have to trade one away.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't think it was that simple as far as trading Grienke. Remember that Grienke had that social anxiety disorder which would make pitching in NY impossible. Also, I believe Grienke had a few teams that he did not want to be traded to so it wasn't like the Royals had unlimited options.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In the end one of these years the Royals are going to have to spend some money and actually make a run at the division. It seems like the Royals have been on a perpetual "Wait for the Future" program since 1993-94.

    ReplyDelete
  4. jquemere ought to read the rest of Posnanski's work on Greinke before talking.

    This reminds me of the Santana trade. Hey Minnesota, how are Humber and Gomez working for you?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I can't help thinking there must have been a better deal out there...and that Moore got hamstrung in the same way Baird had earlier, by seeking return at specific positions. Granted, this approach makes more sense now than when Baird grabbed Buck and Teahen--Moore has his eye towards a legitimate wave of prospects arriving in the next two years.

    But, still, you have to walk away from a trade like this with excellence in return. You have to have obtained rare commodities (or at least one). If you get overstocked at some position, well, you make another trade.

    I think Moore lost the forest for the trees. I'm not impressed. He looks more and more to me like a director of minor league talent, and not a G.M.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yeah - it's an odd situation, isn't it? You have a player who has demanded a trade and yet is exercising a no-trade. He's certainly within his rights, but it sure makes it tough on the current team.

    It would probably help small market teams a lot if players couldn't be granted a no-trade clause until they'd become eligible for free agency. I don't see why the MLBPA would go for that, but it would help a team like KC here: Zack wants a trade? Fine, but he goes where ever the deal is best.

    ReplyDelete
  7. As a Brewers fan, I'm thrilled, but I'm also disappointed that we had to give up Lo Cain. I think he's a TREMENDOUS young player. By all accounts, he's good in the clubhouse. He showed squat for power in the majors, but he can move on the bases like no one else I've seen in Milwaukee in years. As for Escobar? Good riddance. But I hear that's how Royals fans feel about Betancourt, so what's the real difference? Anyway, I'm happy, and like Joe said, if the middle is strengthened defensively for the Royals, this may actually turn into a pretty good move...

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is depressing, although there is a mix of opinion on the trade from smart people. Rany will be up with his view tomorros.

    Joe makes the one point that bothers me -- shouldn't a team get a potential star in return for a guy like Greinke? I assume the Royals would get someone the equivalent of Moustakas or Hosner. It did not happen.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Joe, go look at who Escobar was rated above by both BA and BP last year.

    http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/top-100-prospects/2010/269546.html

    Way too soon to conclude he cannot become a star, particularly when his BABIP was .264. That bounces up even to .300, let alone where it really ought to project (.315 or so) and you're looking at a solid 4 WAR SS for years.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I can't imagine that some team wouldn't have come up with more prospects this offseason. Escobar as the best player coming back is a really poor return - how is he even any better than Betancourt?

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'd also like to bring up one other point.

    Part of the reason that the Beltran trade approach was so stupid was because the 2004 Royals didn't have holes to fill--the team was a barren wasteland of talent both at the ML and MiLB level. The Royals desperately needed to get some high level guys in the system.

    That is not the case for the 2010 Royals.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is a great trade for Milwaukee, but as a Cardinals fan, it causes me a great deal of consternation. Over the years(even when they were winning), the Cardinals have had a tough go of it with the Brewers, and this is just going to increase that difficulty.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I think that a lot of the criticism of the trade has been a little unfair. There seems to be too high of a standard for both what an ace pitcher should bring in for a trade and Greinke's marketability.

    It seems that every time an ace pitcher is traded (Santana, Halladay and Sabathia come to mind), the trade is criticized because the prospect haul wasn't impressive enough. Maybe we simply have too high of a standard for pitchers trade values. Over the past ten years, five Cy Young winners in their prime have been traded and none of the deals have been brought back anything that is impressive. The best prospect haul for a Cy Young winner, the Colon trade/debacle, is the exception to the rule. Ace pitchers just don't demand as much trade value as we think they should. If they did, there would be more successful trades for ace pitchers.

    Also, one can't compare Greinke to the other major pitching trades of the past five or so years because Greinke doesn't quite have the track record of most of the other major pitches who have been traded. Santana, Halladay and Sabathia all had rather extensive track records of success. Greinke, while an extremely talented pitcher, has had one and a half year of seasons of good pitching and one season of being Greg Maddux with a fast-ball. While impressive, it isn't comparable to the years of success that Santana, Halladay and Sabathia had before they were traded. Greinke has the ability to be the best pitcher in baseball, and he was a year ago, but he is not a sure thing like Santana, Halladay and Sabathia.

    The best comparison is Cliff Lee. A so so career filled with promise that suddenly bloomed into one of the best pitchers in baseball. Both had over one year remaining on their contract, both had off the field issues (people forget that Cliff Lee was kinda an ass) and both trades were seen as underwhelming. I think that, looking at the standards of the Cliff Lee trade specifically, and the trades of other, more proven Cy Young winners, Moore got about what could be expected.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ok, here is another thing, regarding Mr. Cain. The guy turns 25 in April and he is still considered a prospect. Terrific.

    How many players (non pitchers) in the history of baseball were considered prospects at age 25 and then turned into good players? Hell, how many have turned into average players?

    Sure it has happened a few times, though no name immediately comes to mind. But talk about a roll of the dice. Geez.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Odorizzi probably does deserve a little more scrutiny in this deal. He was a 1st round pick 2 years ago, and I don't think he has done anything in the last couple seasons to think that was a mistake. I'd put him right there with guys like Crow and Melville. Personally I'd take my chances with Odorizzi over those 2, but I might be in the minority with that.

    Not sure it was the best deal the Royals can get or not, but I think they got a better return than most seem to.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Oops. Colon was not a Cy Young winner when he was traded. My bad.

    ReplyDelete
  17. A week ago, Dayton Moore was asking the moon for Zack Greinke. As always happens with the Royals - regardless of who's GM - he settled for a piece of cheese. A pox on you, Dayton Moore: You just stole Christmas.

    The Royals' penchant for giving away the house in order to save money is well-chronicled, and Moore's own actions are becoming quite predictable: Trade away one of your best players, and lavish him with praise as he's on his way out.

    ---Then he slunk to the ice box. He took the Whos' feast, he took the Who pudding, he took the roast beast. He cleaned out that ice box as quick as a flash. Why, the GM even took their last can of Who hash.---

    Like many Royals fans and bloggers, I could pen thousands of words of my own recounting 40 years of passionate, unconditional allegiance, and also how everything since 1994 has been stained with ineptitude and embarrassment. Those words would undoubtedly express the same sentiments which are so universal amongst Royals fans, they're alomst hackneyed.

    However, unlike Cone, Sabes, Damon, Dye, Beltran and a broken-down Sweeney ... there's a profound sense of dread and sadness that I feel toward losing Zack. Trading Zack hurts ... deeply.

    He was truly ours. He's the biggest star we've had in two-and-a-half decades. Any other franchise would have built around HIM, and would have given him all the money and assurance necessary to keep him. Then, they would have actually BUILT a winning team as planned.

    We just told him to wait. Custer and the cavalry are on they way, and somehow, every single one of the 21-year-old unproven players we have on the farm are going to be big stars - just wait and see. But no, Zack, we can't guarantee that you'll still be here when they arrive. Then, we'll make it YOUR fault for being a 'malcontent,' because it's not politically correct for your star to honestly say that losing 95 games every season really sucks.

    ---You're a foul one, Mr. Moore / You're a nasty, wasty skunk / Your heart is full of unwashed socks, your soul is full of gunk / Mr. Moore / The three words that best describe you are as follows, and I quote: Stink, stank, stunk!---

    In all my years of watching baseball, I've never seen a pitcher who made his craft appear to be so easy. When Zack is "on" (read: interested), he toys with opposing hitters. He can throw any pitch at any speed in any location, and the hitter is powerless. He can be mesmerizing and transcendent. He can be enigmatic and aloof. He can be dismissive and distant. These qualities make him even more endearing, in my eyes. This ... trade ... hurts.

    ---And what happened then? Well, in Whoville they say that this fan's big heart shrunk three sizes that day.---

    ReplyDelete
  18. Along the lines of what Anonymous posted December 19, 2010 8:55 PM, it is worth noting that at the start of last year, Escobar was Baseball America's #12 rated prospect in MLB. However, as you noted, he flopped miserably, being rather average defensively, struggling mightily at the plate, and, worse still, was seemingly unable to steal bases despite his speed and success at doing so in the minors.

    I think at this point we could use a poll titled "Which Royal not named Jeff Francoeur will Joe blog about most in 2011?". I'd put my money on Jason Kendall.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Joe, first time poster here- love your work.

    I wanted to add my take here- one, as you pointed out, the corners should be taken care of by Myers, Moustakas, Hosmer, and hopefully a signing smarter than Francoeur/Melky Cabrera. Colon at 2B perhaps? If all goes to plan reasonably, the pitching should be right up there in terms of ability. However, at that point, it may turn out to be really hard to find solid options for SS/CF/2B. At that point, the team may find itself having to blow silly money to get league average performance, or give up a bunch in trade for a guy that can fill that spot. Right now, Moore decided to punt on that to fill 2 holes with players with some upside, and the possibility of regular league average performance. Usually, I would pan this, but a team with a stacked farm like KCR could possibly make this look smart in 2-3 years. They could have (I think) gotten more value in terms of WAR from other players, but they may not have been able to fill big holes down the middle in MLB. The theory that you take the best player available always , and you can flip him to fill a position of need later, is a solid one. But its not necessary that you will be able to convert that chip when you need to badly, and other teams know they have you over a barrel. There are few occasions when picking players on need rather than best player av. is acceptable, but this may be one of them. We'll see in 3 years or so.

    ReplyDelete
  20. "This reminds me of the Santana trade. Hey Minnesota, how are Humber and Gomez working for you?"

    Similar in that a "small market" team's ace was traded for prospects. This differs significantly in two reasons. First, the Twins were actually perennial contenders within the division. Forgoing one year of Santana for a grab bag of prospects who were not going to help during that year has much more importance for a contender than it does for the Royals. The Royals will not be competitive in 2011 even with Greinke. Second, Santana was also about to enter his last year of his contract. Greinke has two years left, and his value could likely increase, (Santana's likely would have as well, but as they were likely to contend in the division, it would be impossible to ship away your ace during a playoff race) but as Joe said it is likely he will fail to remain motivated in KC and make trading him harder once the prices are increased during the season. His anxiety issues, it would likely drive his price down a bit going to a team in a playoff race. However, I doubt that risk would prohibit the Royals getting a great deal from a truly desperate team.

    L-fish is right that Santana and Greinke are likely more valuable than the sum of the prospects each team received in their trades.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Seems like the Beltran trade all over again. It's too bad we didn't get some better players in the deal. Sounds like Yost wanted to go with guys he knew. This is going to work out about as good as the guys Dayton has brought in from Atlanta. It's not.

    I'm not sure we did the wrong thing either. I would spend the money on Soria and others, instead of Grienke. As we get closer to having a competitive team, we can sign some free agent pitchers. Grienke isn't a #1 starter. We probably won't ever have one. It takes mental toughness to be in that role.

    Bottom line is the Royals could have been decent in 2012, but wouldn't have the money to keep Grienke anyways. Either way, they'd have eventually gotten nothing for him. We need a salary cap like football to level the playing field or we need to spend more on our front office and field manager, so that we can outsmart the competition.

    ReplyDelete
  22. The best way I can describe my feeling on the trade is blah. I can't say I'm upset because they are all under contract for the next 4-5 years and could be solid players. I can't help but feel the Royals could have received more. It certainly isn't the Beltran deal though, because that was horrible.

    At the very least we got rid of Yuni, and that's a victory in itself.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I will say that the Royals got royally hosed on this deal.

    Really, the only thing a KC fan can do is vote with their wallet. Greinke was a draw, by all accounts a great pitcher to watch pitch, and now you have literally no players that will draw fans. Sad.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Is Greinke really an ace though? His ERA+ was 100 last year. Over the last three full seasons of starting, it's been 126, 205, 100. He has a longer track record of not being an ace. His strikeout rate fell last year and besides one year when it was over 9, he hasn't been a dominant strikeout force.

    I truly believe that he benefitted from a very fortuitous schedule in 2009. People talked about Greinke not having the boost of facing the Royals that season but that was more than made up by facing the Tigers, White Sox and Indians a combined 15 times that year. Those three were just a hair better than the Royals in scoring runs and to make things easier, when Greinke twice faced the Indians, it was after they had traded away Victor Martinez and placed Sizemore on the DL for the rest of the season. He went the whole season not facing the Yankees, only facing the Red Sox once and by good fortune, only faced the Twins, who were a top 5 offense, twice despite the unbalanced schedule.

    He has great stuff and the intelligence to become a no.1 but his resume isn't good enough to demand a king's ransom.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Seems that if you trade a legitimate elite talent with 2 years left on his contract, you should be getting one player who PROJECTS to be at that same level (since, who knows - anything could happen to a prospect - see: Gordon, Alex).

    Maybe I just am not getting it.

    ReplyDelete
  26. The man won a Cy Young Award. You'd think that would at least net a ready-made MLB player — a legit every day starter who is better-than-average. Instead, the Royals trade away the only player anyone outside of Kansas City actually knows as the face of the franchise for four 20-year-olds. Bah, humbug.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Baseball needs relegation. The Royals have been a minor league team for years, so why not change the rules to reflect reality?

    ReplyDelete
  28. Bravo, BillP. Brav-O!

    ReplyDelete
  29. As a Brewer fan, I've been buzzing about this since last night. In 2009, there was a rumor that we were trading for Greinke in exchange for JJ Hardy, Manny Parra, and a zillion other guys. This deal seems like a real bargain for Milwaukee. I really have to credit Doug Melvin for putting it all on the line here. Our pitching staff really was that bad; guys like Parra, Bush, and whatever aging veteran we chose to sign were just not getting it done. This is now a championship-caliber team. I don't care if they had to sell the farm...I'm 24 and the Brewers have been to the playoffs ONCE since I've been alive. It's worth it!!!

    ReplyDelete
  30. " Why not let the price build and build, as it certainly would."

    Joe -
    Why is the price certain to build? The more time that goes by, the less time (and value) he provides to the acquiring team. I don't know about you, but I'd give up more for 2 years of his services than one and a half. Also, there's injury risk - if he gets hurt playing for the royals his trade value goes through the floor.

    ReplyDelete
  31. This type of trade is what people mean when they refer to parity and compare the sports. In baseball, the majority of teams can not afford to keep the superstars they develop; some may be able to keep one or two; few can keep them all. There isn't another sport where, for financial reasons, teams lose their best players so regularly to the same few teams that can afford such large contracts. I love baseball as much as any sport, but much of the league is on its way to being a ghost town due to financial mismanagement and imbalance.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I think the Royals management did the right thing to trade Greinke. Why keep a disgruntled star for 2 more losing seasons? I don't even like Greinke, he's been little more than a punk for years, you don't want a headcase on your team anyways. He's good, very good but he's not the solution to the Royals problems. Plus, I'm happy he got traded to the Brewers, so do we all think the Brewers will now make it to the World Series for the first time in THIRTY YEARS??!! Yeah, Greinke will take the Brew Crue there for sure..keep believing that.

    Anyway, Greinke is gone and there is hope for the first time in a decade. I like all the other Royals players now that both this kid and Guillen are gone. The guy from Kailua can play, the new guys are coming up from the minors the next couple of years, the Royals are finally getting it right.

    Bye Bye Greinke, you think playing for KC sucks, enjoy beautiful Milwaukee lol.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Joe, you're obviously tainted like so many other KC fans. You point to Beltran and Damon but do you remember the circumstances of the franchise back then?

    Do you remember who was running the team? How much money was available to spend? You failed to mention the team's decision to spend $55 million on Mike Sweeney which absolutely crippled the organization for 5 years. (Not to mention HE was a cripple.)

    I'm surprised that you've taken on the personality of the whining portion of the KC fan base. This team has never been this stocked with talent in the minor leagues. NEVER. Yet like every other pessimistic Royals fan all you can find is the dark cloud inside the silver lining.

    Greinke was good. He was good once every five days. The Royals just acquired two players that were desperately needed EVERY DAY. I'll take two good players with potential upside every day over a 10-14 disgruntled pitcher. Could they have gotten more? Maybe...maybe not. Maybe they keep Greinke and he blows an arm out in February...or plays KC Whiner and pitches like cr@p next year and lessens his value.

    We'll see how this trade works out - but your pessimism reeks of the kind of defeatism that kills fan bases.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Why tiptoe around the subject? Greinke is a ticking timebomb and at the end of every season he may be either a Cy Young winner or completely out of baseball.

    The Royals did the right thing.

    ReplyDelete
  35. The optimist in me saw how ridiculous he was in 2009, and it hurts to see him go.

    The realist in me sees that another losing season would have led to another year of Greinke pitching bored. Combine that with one less year of affordability left on his contract, and who knows what the Royals could have gotten next off-season.

    Everyone in KC thinks we're giving away the franchise because we always overvalue what we own. This part of human nature is why the show Real Estate Intervention exists. As mentioned above, Greinke had one superhuman season and has been average to good otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
  36. As someone who is not a Royals fan, all I can say is: thank you, Kansas City, for not trading Greinke to the Yankees.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Joe, I think you're being overly critical of this deal. Two reasons:

    1. As has been previously mentioned, Greinke isn't exactly an established ace. He had a good year in 2008, a historically awesome year in 2009, and a league-average year in 2010. What does that mean for his future? He could be awesome, or he could be inconsistent, or he could end up out of baseball. I'm betting on him at least being pretty good, but he's hardly a sure thing.

    2. You criticize the Royals for not getting someone with potential star power in return. Thing is... the Royals already have plenty of potential star power on the way. Hosmer and Moustakas may be the best two hitters in the minor leagues right now. They've got a whole slew of pitching prospects who could be aces and a bunch of other guys with substantial potential.

    So what did the Royals need? Someone to play shortstop, someone else to play center field. Now they have young, cost-controlled players at both positions. The implications for the next couple of years are absurd... by 2012, they could be down to a Marlins-esque payroll and have the flexibility to go out and sign whoever they need to sign. Hell, they could even go and bring Greinke back when they're prepared to contend.

    I applaud the Brewers for going all in for next year, but I really think this trade helps the Royals go from future contender to future powerhouse.

    ReplyDelete
  38. There was speculation last year that the Brewers intended to move Jeffress back to a starting role this coming year, but wanted to limit the workload as he was coming back from suspension and injury.

    If I'm the Royals, I'd definitely give him a shot at starting again.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I hope lorenzo cain plays well because I enjoy saying his name.

    It's an interesting trade mentality. It's like the Cliff Lee trade from the Indians to the Phillies. The Phillies gave up a few guys that they thought were average (or slightly less) major leaguers, but they were ready to play. Up to this point, the only time any of them has gotten in the news is because one of them hit the ball that ended Armando Galarraga's perfect game.

    ReplyDelete
  40. They were put in the position that they had to trade him or risk his value decreasing. Your assertion that his trade value would certainly build and build is wrong. Did he have more value after 2009 or 2010? He was completely uninterested in pitching for a loser, he showed that all year. I am sure he will go out and dominate this year but that doesn't mean that he would do the same thing here. Zack's actions through this process really screwed us and I know we want to be pissed at Dayton, but he is not the person we should be upset with.

    ReplyDelete
  41. What was the hurry?

    This is what is so baffling about this trade.

    With 2 years at $27M, Greinke represents value to the *Royals*. Why not just use him? Especially if you expect to be in a position to make some noise in 2012? If things work out as planned for 2012, you have an ace pitcher at a decent salary leading the charge. If they don't work out, then you can dump him at the trade deadline - and one of the questions you have to ask is whether this haul of "prospects" is better than the one they might have been expected to reap at the 2012 trade deadline.

    And ya, he requested a trade. But if I'm the Royals GM I have to respectfully say "Zach, your concern is duly noted, now take the ball and pitch".

    The thing about trading Greinke now is that not only are you trading an ace pitcher, you are trading an ace pitcher who has 2 years of below market salary on his contract. I mean really - Greinke will make slightly more over the next *2* seasons than Cliff Lee will this year. So that's a lot of value you are giving up. For the life of me I just can't imagine this is the best deal out there. There were initially rumours here in Toronto that the Royals were demanding Kyle Drabek & Travis Snyder (which is a trade I make, btw, if I'm the Jays - and which, as far as I can tell is a better deal than they got), but that in fact the price tag was higher than that. Well I have a hard time believing that now seeing what they eventually settled for. I have to imagine teams around MLB are kicking themselves at not having been able to swing a deal given the paucity of the return.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Prospects at 25 that turned into good players? Ryan Howard.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Pitchers don't get stars as trade compensation. Sluggers do. I'm not unhappy with this trade. I liked Zack, but I'm sick of him. He had one brilliant season and has brilliant stuff. But he's not brilliant. If he suddenly turns on consistency and team-attitude in Milwaukee, I'll eat my words, but I don't want the guy in blue, anymore. And it's worth it to shed Yuni, as well.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Thanks Ryan. If any of those guys turns into Ryan Howard I will be the first to admit error.

    Ain't happening.

    ReplyDelete
  45. In 2006, the Boston Bruins had some holes to fill to turn them into a real contender. To fill those holes, they traded their best player (Joe Thorton) for some spare parts. They quickly realized that, without their best player, they were not a team that needed to fill their parts to be a contender, they were just a collection of spare parts.

    If the Royals front office is poor enough to trade their only star player to fill some holes--holes which, if filled, will make them a .500 ball club--then they deserve to preside over a team that will no doubt be a sub-.500 collection of spare parts for the foreseeable future.

    And the suggestion that the Royals don't need potential star players because they have enough of those in the system, give me a break. I've never heard a baseball fan say "man, our team has too many great players, let's trade a couple of them for a bunch of spare parts." You can never, never, ever have enough talent.

    ReplyDelete
  46. "Pitchers don't get stars as trade compensation."

    What did the Marlins get from the Red Sox for Josh Beckett?

    ReplyDelete
  47. As an Indians fan I know the same process of developing stars from the ground up and then trading them away for the good part. It's frustrating to the point that you wonder why you do it anymore.

    What's the point of winning the lottery if you can't spend the money?

    ReplyDelete
  48. MArk from Vegas wrote: "Ok, here is another thing, regarding Mr. Cain. The guy turns 25 in April and he is still considered a prospect. Terrific.

    How many players (non pitchers) in the history of baseball were considered prospects at age 25 and then turned into good players? Hell, how many have turned into average players?"

    Well, Edgar Martinez did not lose his rookie status until he was 26, nor Wade Boggs until he was 24. Not that I expect Lorenzo Cain to be one of them, but it does happen.

    And there are tons of players who came up at age 25 who turned into average players. So you can relax a bit and chill out on this some.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Dodger300 -

    Yeah, but those guys were outstanding minor league players who should have got their shot long before.

    And if Cain turns into an average player, then it is not a very good trade, is it?

    ReplyDelete
  50. Greinke was either going to be very productive on bad teams the next 2 seasons & left via free agency, or pitched more like 2010 than 2009 and netted the Royals less later then now. Even if his trade value went up, there was still no way he would be a Royal in 2013 when the Royals will have their first possible chance to be a playoff contender. The risk of having nothing to show for Greinke in 2013 was too great to wait.

    Starting with the above, getting ANY contributors to the 2013 team and beyond is a positive. Perhaps more could have been netted, but Greinke did turn down a trade to the team that has already proven willing to pay up to get their man (Nationals- Werth), and likely gave similar feedback on other teams (likely Yankees, maybe all AL teams on his no-trade list). The Blue Jays would not give up Drabek and Snider and I trust the Royals heard all real offers because, even if you want to believe the Royals are incompetent, every GM of a "competent" team that was considering Greinke realized they had to make their best offer because a trade was imminent. I think we have to accept that this trade was AT LEAST in context with the best offer available, if not the best.

    The final criticism is the insistence on particular positions. As a TRUE fan of the Royals and a TRUE sports fan I see no reason to aim for anything less than the playoffs. The Royals already have the most "talent" on the way, but before this trade, they were not going to be a playoff contender because in baseball, you need all of the positions on the field and in the lineup filled. To replicate positions and even talents (i.e. middle of the lineup hitters) does not improve our chances of being a playoff team as much as actual contributors at positions of need. We NEED defense up the middle, we NEED a leadoff hitter and bottom of the order contributors, we NEED RHPs to add to the wishful collection of talent we have to be a playoff contender. We now at least have hope of fulfilling those needs. Just as we have hope that the players in the system now will live up to expectations. (If you do not realize this is not a certainty, allow me to remind you that Alex Gordon was a BETTER prospect than Hosmer, Moose & Myers... Gordon spent some time as the #1 prospect in baseball, none of the others have to date).

    Redundance of talent is not helpful because with so little currently on the major league team that will contribute to 2013 and beyond, virtually all of our prospects MUST hit, JUST TO BE A CONTENDER. If Hosmer, Moose AND Myers don't work out and if at least 3 of the SPs don't click, we are not contending anyway.

    This is all a long-winded way of saying, in my opinion:
    1-Trading Greinke now was the right move.
    2-I trust we got just about as much as we could get.
    3-Trading for 2013 needs was the right thing to do with the goal being to compete in 2013 & beyond, not just to win more games.

    Now we can all go to sleep for 2 years and wake up to news that the RF fence was moved in to cater to our lefty sluggers and our LHPs that all are ready to produce on the MLB level. If nothing else, this trade has given me the patience to wait until 2013. Expectations beyond that from the Greinke trade are misled.

    ReplyDelete