Yesterday, I wrote a bit about why the Pro Bowl doesn't matter (but I would watch anyway). Then, I made a big mistake. I actually did watch the Pro Bowl. I watched every awful minute of it. I wasn't alone -- the Pro Bowl drew its best ratings in a decade. As expected, more people watched it than watched baseball's All-Star Game, which not too long ago was a big day in sports television. Perhaps unexpected, more people watched it than watched Game 3 of the World Series.*
*As my buddy Michael Rosenberg tweeted: "Our country is doomed."
I would normally say these ratings were good for the NFL -- the league is so powerful and popular that a substantial number of people will even watch the Pro Bowl. How can that be anything but good? But, as mentioned, I actually watched the Pro Bowl this year. I watched linebackers back away from tackles. I watched defensive linemen stand up and chat with offensive linemen after the snap. I watched Jay Glazer try some sort of goofy stunt where he called a play or something -- it was embarrassing enough that I had to turn away from the TV. Hawaiian shirt. I heard two Goo Goo Dolls songs. It is not something expect to recover from any time soon.
The big moment was the last score --- there, Matt Cassel threw a pass to Dwayne Bowe. After he danced around a bit -- defenders seemed uninterested in tackling him -- Bowe pitched he ball back to Montell Owens, who was apparently taking a break from his Money Mutual commercials.* Owens danced around a bit too, defenders seemed as uninterested in him as they were in Bowe. When they finally surrounded him, he pitched the ball back to Cleveland Browns center Alex Mack, who made the Pro Bowl as a second alternate. Mack ran around a bit, then kept running, and nobody really cared, and he scored a touchdown.
*Oh, sorry, that's Montel WILLIAMS. Montell Owens is a special teams guru on the Jacksonville Jaguars.
For some reason, this caused much hilarity and joy in the FOX booth. "Good for that young man," FOX's Thom Brennaman said about Mack, as if he had just won a Rhodes Scholarship or something. This pathetic play where the NFC simply allowed the AFC to score because, well, nobody cared, made the score 55-41, in case you were keeping score, which, of course, you were not.
And, maybe it just hit me wrong. But I thought it was grotesque. I mean really, truly, grotesque. The laterals, the refusal to tackle, the absurdity. And it hit me, all at once, that in this one instance I don't think good ratings are good for the league. No, after spending years and years developing their brand, after years of creating the aura of the National Football League (as they always call it), after years of Butkus and Lombardi and Taylor and Payton and Emmitt, no, they don't want people watching this garbage.
Or anyway, they shouldn't want it. Yes, people know the Pro Bowl doesn't matter. But when they put it on prime time on the Sunday before the Super Bowl, they are begging people to watch. And when people watch, they see this joke of football, barely two-hand touch, everyone going half speed, guys trying silly maneuvers that don't work and aren't fun to watch, teams conceding touchdowns to centers and guys in the booth saying it's great. As I wrote the other day, football is a more serious sport than the others. The NFL should know that since it has been peddling seriousness for many years. You don't put roman numerals after your games unless you want to be taken seriously.
I've always thought that the NFL should just keep playing the Pro Bowl because it's a tradition, and because Hawaii is awesome, and because the whole thing seems fairly harmless. But after actually sitting through a whole game, I don't think that anymore. I think the NFL has outgrown the Pro Bowl in its current state. Maybe they could turn Pro Bowl week into a celebration of the best players -- maybe an ESPY-like celebration hosted by Chris Rock, a few skills competitions, a tricked-up football format. But the idea of playing a real game, 60 minutes, with pads and coaches and announcers and this facade of authenticity ... I don't think it works anymore. The players don't care and don't want to play. The fans, largely, don't care and don't want to watch. And the fans who DO want to watch generally find what they're seeing to be pretty unappetizing.
Or anyway, that's how I felt about it. I don't expect linebackers to brace themselves and plow into running backs in the Pro Bowl. But that doesn't mean I want to watch them scurry away. I don't expect to see players rushing the punter in the Pro Bowl, maybe blowing out ACLs or whatever. But that doesn't mean I want to watch them just stand there and chat. People like watching the action in action movies. Nobody really wants to watch the air punches during rehearsals.
The NFL has bigger things to worry about right now than the fate of the Pro Bowl. Los Angeles looks ready to make its NFL move. A lockout, I'm told, is a real possibility and the men in charge are in serious negotiations. The concussion issue isn't going away. And the Pro Bowl just drew its biggest ratings in a decade. So this is low on the list. But, the funny thing is, I think those high ratings might lead to the end of the Pro Bowl as we know it. Too many people saw it. To many people saw just how pointless and awful it is.
circle me NFL Films parodies in virtually every NFL endorsed non-football product
ReplyDeleteMy feelings exactly.
ReplyDeleteThis was actually the first time I've ever watched the pro bowl. I'm not a huge football fan and I'd be the first to admit that I barely know anything about the sport. Yet even I could see that this is the saddest excuse for a game in all of major North American sports.
ReplyDeleteSomeone brought this up on the PozCast (which, by the way, made the game much more tolerable. Thanks, Joe), but what if the NFL just made it a flag football game? It's fun and novel. And it wouldn't be an embarrassment when the players don't take it seriously.
I like the idea of something different along the lines that Joe suggested-- celebration and some kind of skill events. Like they have strongman competitions-- Have the linemen do linemen exercises, have wide d-backs and receivers do running kinds of things. A linebacker vs. running back tug-of-war. or maybe take a page from the show "Wipe Out" and have them navigate a ridiculous foot-ball theme obstacle course ("Oh look, Frank, the giant kicker's shoo knocked him in to the mud!")
ReplyDeleteDoes the NFL make money on the pro bowl? If the answer is yes, they will keep on playing it.
ReplyDeleteSkills competition as NFL Combine revisited.
ReplyDeletethen tweak it.
I love the idea of an Oscar/ESPY-like party to close the football season and end the charade. It could still be in Hawaii, and the awards presenters can accept on behalf of the guys who are preparing for the Super Bowl.
ReplyDeleteThis is crazy. I thought the game was very entertaining and the touchdown by the center was the best of all the entertainment. I love Joe, but he is taking things way too seriously here. The guys tackled each other. They threw nice passes. And they seemed to have fun. Who cares that it was not the sort of vicious, brutal football that we see in real games. It was a show. No one expects a normal football game.
ReplyDeleteI have to say, I agree with the above poster. The game didn't seem to me as damaging as joe portrays it. It was lame, but certainly not a travesty. That being said, there are better ideas than a 60 min game. Some sort of skills comp would be fun
ReplyDeleteI watched the NHL All-Star game (some of it, anyway). I felt the same way, except, it's just different with hockey. I mean, one can, conceivably, walk into an ice rink, get some skates and play pickup hockey. That's what the NHL game felt like to me — a bunch of dudes who went down to the rink on Sunday afternoon to play in an over-30 mens' league. Obviously, though, you had Alex Ovechkin being Ovechkin and Nick Lindstom being Lindstrom, so it's not EXACTLY the same. But there was an air of a bunch of guys on the rink having fun, and it didn't necessarily "ruin" the game for me. I only watched about a period, because I got the idea. But, I mean, of course they didn't play defense and didn't check and took a lot of shots in the all-star game, but in reality, how many over 30 rec leagues do you see guys REALLY laying into each other? Not many.
ReplyDeleteI turned it off after a period and the final score was 11-10. It was close the whole time. I'm fine with this. I saw a few sweet goals and not much else.
Football, though, is different. Most over 30 men can't go to the park, lace up the pads, put on the helmet and play a real 11-on-11 football game. They just can't. Some do, of course, play in full-contact mens' leagues, but most dudes playing football are guys who go to the park on a summer sunday, swill beers and play 7-on-7 touch football.
That's because, and you said this the other day, football is a game that requires so much practice, so much mental and physical preparation, that one can't just walk out onto the field and play right away.
That's why I think it's easier for people to accept the NHL and NBA all-star games as concepts. It's not all that much different than what tyou'd see in rec leagues. Aside, of course, from the skill level, which is why anyone watches them to begin with.
What the NFL needs to do is scrap the whole "full-contact" concept and try to change it up. Maybe go 7-on-7, have guys wear only partial pads, slap a red "no-contact" jersey on the QB and let them mess around. That way, the NFL would make it clear: We aren't expecting hard hits, we're not expecting a serious game, we just want to see if we can do some cool stuff like running crazy pass routes and such. I dunno, at least it would make it less of a farce and more enjoyable.
Amen to this...you know a sporting event is farcical and meaningless when I won't watch a minute of it. Strangely it seems I was in the minority last night.
ReplyDeleteGoing through Patriots withdrawal, I turned the game on against my better judgment to see some of the hometown heroes in action. I lasted three plays, and will never watch another Pro Bowl game.
ReplyDeleteEven if my daughter is elected as starting quarterback.
Were there any concussions? Anybody paralyzed? This is the way all football should be, two-hand touch, take half the money out of the overcoaching and overequipping and give it to charity. Even better, take out four of the 300-pound "players" who are clogging up space and make it 7-on-7.
ReplyDeleteMichael Rosenberg is correct, and maybe the masses would become less interested in a more civilized football and more interested once again in baseball.
Two words: flag football. Make it a tourney of 7 on 7 flag football...
ReplyDeleteIt's just a freaking game. And football is no more serious than any other freaking game.
ReplyDeleteThe minute you take this too seriously, it's time to give it up.
To the people suggesting flag football: Robert Edwards, a rookie for the Patriots in 1998, blew out his knee at the Pro Bowl, which effectively ended his season. He did this in a flag football game.
ReplyDeleteJust something to think about, and I'm sure something that would be on player's minds that would make them care just as little about a game of flag football as they do about the Pro Bowl.
One thing I wish they had (or if they do, I never hear about it) is the Quarterback Challenge thing. That thing is fun.
Double post: the QB Challenge thing I'm talking about is this:
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League_Quarterback_Challenge
For once I think you're way off base. It's an exhibition that nobody takes seriously and I think that most people who tune in know exactly what they're going to see. The Pro Bowl has been an elaborate schoolyard game for decades without doing any damage to the NFL brand.
ReplyDeleteI think that relatively few people actually sit down and watch the thing start to finish, as you did. It's the kind of event that a lot of people watch a little bit of. I guess if you watch the whole thing you can get frustrated with the indifferent play but that's not the way most fans watch the event. If you honestly find a garbage time touchdown in an exhibition game truly grotesque you may be taking the whole thing a wee bit too seriously.
I don't think you're going to see major changes to the Pro Bowl anytime soon. When ratings for a TV show are up 50% in two years people tend not to say, hey, we need to blow this whole thing up and start over.
I only vote for a skills competition if everyone is given the Wonderlic again
ReplyDeleteThe Pro Bowl will clearly continue. The NFL probably deems that their idea to move the game to the week before the Super Bowl was a smashing success. They've had two straight years of ratings gains since that move. The sky is the limit.
ReplyDeleteAfter I posted the comment above at 4:12am I decided to look up some numbers to see if I could confirm my own suspicion. Some stats on recent NFL TV viewing:
ReplyDeleteThe average Pro Bowl viewer watched 36% of the Pro Bowl
The average AFC Championship Game viewer watched 60% of the game
The average NFC Championship viewer watched 64% of that game
The point being that as a group the viewing audience seems to have the Pro Bowl in the right perspective. They're surfing in and out a lot more than they do for a meaningful game. It doesn't seem like fans are overinvested in it.
Chuckle me to "You don't put roman numerals after your games unless you want to be taken seriously.".
ReplyDeleteI've often wondered about when the Super Bowl's roman numeral will get so absurd that the NFL will be forced to revert to using arabic numbers. I first thought they might bail when XXX's turn came up. Then I thought they mightn't subject us to XXXVIII (the 1st 7-digit SB)? When will the madness cease? LXXXVIII? Never?
Otherwise, perhaps the NFL should just adopt roman numerals universally? Put roman numerals on the players' jerseys, on the scoreboard (I'll say Packers XXIII, Steelers XIX), on the yardline markings, on the section/row/seat labels.
Heard similar discussions on Vancouver radio about the NHL all-star game, which is equally, well, lacking.
ReplyDeleteThe proposed solution? Still have all-star weekend. Still let the league celebrate, and let players enjoy their time in Hawaii or wherever, but rather than a lame hockey or football game, have a golf tournament.
Or see who's best at ping-pong. Or bowling.
Just do anything – something – that isn't a shell of the sport they normally play. I don't know about you, but I'd rather find out which AFC offensive lineman can break 80 on the golf course than watch him score a meaningless TD on a triple lateral against a disinterested defence.