So I was thinking about one of the coolest statistical anomalies in baseball history -- that Roger Maris was not intentionally walked a single time the year he hit 61 home runs. I first heard that stat, nerdily enough, at a baseball card show. There was some kind of trivia contest going on, and one of the questions was, "How many times was Roger Maris intentionally walked the year he hit 61 home runs?"
Bizarrely, my guess was 61. Well, how would I know? I was like 14.
In any case, once I realized it was zero -- and once I realized that the REASON it was zero is because, of course, Mickey Mantle hit behind Maris, I thought it was one of the coolest things I'd ever heard. I knew, of course, about Mickey Mantle but only in that vague, historical way that my daughter knows that Elvis was once kind of popular. My father had told me Mantle stories, and I'm pretty sure I knew that he hit long home runs, that he was a switch-hitter (which meant you would never intentionally walk the guy in front to get a lefty-lefty or righty-righty matchup) and that had as good a baseball name as anyone ever. But it was after I heard that stat that Mantle grew in my mind, became something larger, a force of nature. As a kid, I LOVED books like "The Boy Who Only Hit Homers" and "The Boy Who Never Struck Out" and "The Boy Who Went To Visit Dr. Frank Jobe" and all those. When I heard the stat, Mantle became for me, "The Man You Never Wanted To Pitch To."
Amazing that a silly little stat about intentional walks could do that for a boy.
Later, I looked up Maris' 61-homer season and found out all sorts of cool things about it. For instance, he actually began the year hitting BEHIND Mantle -- he hit fifth in the lineup in seven of the first nine games. He was hitting so poorly then, they moved him to SEVENTH in the lineup. On May 2nd, he had one home run. He was hitting .212 and slugging .308. He picked up a little and on May 17 was more or less moved full-time to the No. 3 spot just in front of Maris. He celebrated by hitting homers four games in a row. He actually hit 19 homers in his first 30 games in the No. 3 spot.
In any case, I was thinking about this, and because I'm like this I started to wonder if anyone else has ever hit even 35 home runs and not been intentionally walked in a season. Turns out, it has happened five different times.
Tony Armas (1983)
Hit 36 home runs without an intentional walk.
Main batters who hit behind him: Wade Boggs, Dwight Evans, Yaz.
Comment: Funny thing, but while the Red Sox seemed convinced that Armas was actually helping their offense in 1983 -- he was in the cleanup role all year and (after all) he did hit 36 homers and drive in 107 RBIs -- every other team seemed fully aware that he was not. Armas' on-base percentage that season was a looks-like-a-misprint .254. He had an 85 OPS+. His WAR was minus-1.4. He was actually KILLING the Red Sox, and they were the only ones that did not seem to realize it. They just kept throwing him out there, day after day, smack in the middle of their lineup. Yes, those RBIs can trick you. Meanwhile, there was no way any manager in his right mind was going to walk the 1983 Tony Armas to face the young Boggs, the middle-aged Dewey or the aging Yaz.
Armas was markedly better in 1984, and he was intentionally walked nine times that year.
Geronimo Berroa (1996)
Hit 36 homers without an intentional walk
Main batters who hit behind him: Mark McGwire, Terry Steinbach, Jason Giambi.
Comment: Actually many different batters hit behind Berroa -- he moved all around the lineup that year -- and it seems his lack of intentional walks had less to do with who was hitting behind and more to do with a complete lack of respect. Berroa was actually quite a decent hitter from 1994-97, but he did strike out a lot, and he hit into double plays, and managers apparently felt pretty comfortable pitching to him. The following year, he was intentionally walked four times.
Andruw Jones (2000)
Hit 36 homers without an intentional walk
Main batter who hit behind him: Chipper Jones.
Comment: OK, see, this was the thing I was looking for ... I was trying to find players who were so good, so dominant, so fearsome that no matter what the situation and no matter how good the hitter at the plate, managers would absolutely not pitch around anyone to get to them. Mantle was obviously that good. So was Chipper Jones. Andruw Jones was a terrific player in 2000. He hit .303, crushed 36 homers, stole 21 bases, played insanely great defense -- Baseball Reference actually ranks him third in WAR behind only Todd Helton and Barry Bonds.
But as good as he was, nobody wanted to pitch to Chipper Jones for that five year run from about 1998 through 2002. As a switch-hitter, he too blunted any matchup-advantages. And he just seemed to hit EVERYTHING hard. Chipper was equally great at the plate from 2005 to 2008, by the way, but he was older, and he was injured quite a bit, and he did not seem invincible like he did in his younger days. The young Chipper -- you just didn't mess with the guy. And managers didn't.
Carlos Quentin (2008)
Hit 36 homers without an intentional walk
Main batters who hit behind him: Jermaine Dye, Jim Thome, Paul Konerko.
Comment: I think this was a bit of a different thing from all the others on the list ... I just don't think people believed in Quentin. His first two seasons in Arizona he hit .230/.316/.425. He struck out almost three times as often as he walked. The Diamondbacks essentially gave up on him. And so when he went to Chicago and killed the ball that year, I think managers were like: "Oh yeah, that won't last."
It did last for the season and by the end, maybe people started to believe. But in a way they were right ... Quentin (because of injuries, perhaps) has not been nearly as good since 2008.
Alex Rodriguez (1998)
Hit 42 homers without an intentional walk
Main batter who hit behind him: Ken Griffey
Comment: Here is the golden one. Who was SO scary a hitter that managers simply refused to walk A-Rod? And, yes, A-Rod was absurdly good in 1998. He had been absurdly good for three years. He was INCREDIBLE as a 20-year-old in 1996, leading the league in hitting, runs and doubles. He was plenty good as a 21-year-old in 1997. And in 1998, he hit .310/.360/.560 with 42 homers, 123 runs, 124 RBIs, 46 steals and a league-leading 213 hits. He led the league in WAR. Oh, everyone knew all about A-Rod.
But, much like Mantle, much like Chipper, managers were not going to walk anybody to face Ken Griffey in the 1990s. Griffey mashed 56 homers in 1998, just like he had in 1997, and he did it with such style and grace ... and I really do believe that plays a part in the managers' mindsets. I mean, sure, 56 homers is 56 homers. But there was something about Griffey that seemed classical and legendary even before he WAS classical and legendary. He always felt like a player out of time -- he was Buck O'Neil's favorite player, the one who reminded him sometimes of Willie Mays, sometimes of Ted Williams, sometimes of Oscar Charleston, sometimes of Turkey Stearnes ...
In any case, managers intentionally walked A-Rod TWO TIMES in more than 2,000 plate appearances from 1996-1998. That was the power of the young Ken Griffey Jr.
Another cool sports stat-Wilt Chamberlain never fouling out of a game in his NBA career.
ReplyDeleteQuentin possibly would have been the MVP in 2008, but he was injured and missed the last month (and the White Sox won the division without him, ending his chances).
ReplyDeleteNo IBBs in '08, but his HBP numbers are just crazy - 20 in that 2008 season, and if you think he gets hit a lot in the majors, look at his minor league numbers.
Prolific day for you today, Joe. I'm impressed.
ReplyDeleteCircle me Matt Christopher...
ReplyDelete@TS
ReplyDeleteBill Simmons tears into Wilt for exactly that in his Book of Basketball. Wilt was so obsessed with not fouling out that he would basically shut down as soon as he was a foul away, effectively fouling himself out. I'm too young to have seen it, but it definitely jives with Wilt's "me first" reputation.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteOne of my favorite intentional walk stories is Mark Teixeira. I can't recall what happened after June 1st (I'm going off an article that was written on that day), but in 2009 and the first two months of 2010, Mark Teixeira was intentionally walked 9 times to pitch to Alex Rodriguez. The result? 5 for 6 with 2 walks and a sac fly, and 18 RBIs. Oh, and that one "out"? Luis Castillo dropped popup in which Teixeira scored from first to win the game.
ReplyDeleteAt what point do you just stop doing it? At the time the article was written, he had hit a grand slam the last THREE TIMES Teixeira was walked in front of him. The article was in response to Acta intentionally walking Teixeira the night before (with, of course, Alex promptly hitting a grand slam).
Intentional walks are dumb as it is (and Teixeira wasn't even hitting to start 2010, yet was intentionally walked twice) in most situations, but at what point do you just stop doing it?
I remember Tony Armas in '83. He swung from the heels, that's for sure. He was a strikeout and DP machine.
ReplyDeleteLooking at the stats of the '83 Sox I see that they had TWO players who led the league in double plays grounded into - Armas and Jim Rice. Both hit into 31 DPs. Looking a little closer, it can bee seen that Armas was significantly worse at this. In '83, he hit into a DP every 4.32 PAs with men on 1st and less than 2 outs. Rice hit into one every 6.48 PAs.
No wonder they didn't walk him.
I think I checked out "The Boy Who Only Hit Homers" like 200 times from my elementary school library. Awesome book.
ReplyDelete@Paul Franz & TS: That's how I remember it w/Wilt. He would avoid that 6th foul like the plague. I don't know if it ever caused him and his team to lose an NBA Championship but it sure helped the opponent have more freedom around the hoop late in a game when Wilt had 5 fouls. I think Bill Russell and Celts loved the fact that Wilt would avoid contact late in games.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I'm a Chip Hilton fan myself. Loved the book where he hurt his pitching arm, had to play the outfield, but was ambidexterious and threw a guy out at home using his left arm. He learned a knuckleball as well. And how many teams had a first basemen named "Biggie Cohen"?
ReplyDeleteI always thought it was impressive that Clark Gillies never accumulated 100 penalty minutes in a single season. He had some famous bouts with the NHL heavyweights of his time: Terry O'Reilly, Tiger Williams. But he won such a reputation that he didn't have to do it all that often - even though when he WAS on the ice, he was a good enough player to make the Hall of Fame. Very few were willing to be the poor sap to take him off the ice for five minutes.
ReplyDeleteGeronimo Berroa:
ReplyDeleteI was at Kauffman one day sometime between 1992 and 1996.... And in the second inning after a one-two-three first the A's were threatening to crack open the game. No one was out and Canseco was on second, McGwire was on first and striding to the plate was Geronimo Berroa.
My 13? year old nephew looked over and said, "We need a ground ball at Gaetti for a triple play."
I laughed and said, "No one hits into ground ball triple plays. Triple plays are always hard liners or baeserunning gaffes. But I see Gaetti is playing on the line and close to the bag!"
My nephew says, "These guys could screw up the baserunning, too."
Next pitch: Berroa SMOKES a one-hop SHOT to Gaetti. Gaetti steps on 3rd, beating Canseco by 65 feet, fires to second - throw beats McGwire by 65 feet and the relay to first beat Berroa by 65 feet.
It was about the funniest thing I have ever seen.
Charles in KC
I was a tween to a teen when Armas played but remembered him as a Power Hitter. I mean he hit 43 in '84 which was Legit. Haven't heard the name in years, though. He was actually pretty decent in a couple of those years (120 ops+). Ahh how times have changed.
ReplyDeleteSo my memory isn't great:
ReplyDeleteMark Aldrete and Stan Javier were the guys on base and it was the 3rd inning.
@nightflyblog --
ReplyDeleteAh, yes, Clark Gillies. Thanks for bringing back those memories. I absolutely hated the Islanders back then, especially Denis Potvin (I was a Rangers fan), but I had nothing but the utmost respect for Clark Gillies. You forgot to mention that he basically ended Dave "Hammer" Schultz's career (and, by extension, the run of the Broad Street Bullies) by just destroying him in a fight.
And those remembering Wilt -- yeah, that's how he rolled. In fact, in my memory, the biggest give-up in sports history was by Wilt in Game 7 of the NBA Finals in 1970. Playing against a center who could barely move (Willis Reed, injured so badly with a torn leg muscle in Game 5 that he missed all of Game 6; in fact, he did not even contest the tip-off to start Game 7), whom he had at least 4 inches and 40 pounds on, Wilt basically threw in the towel after Reed made his (and the game's) first two shots. Reed played just the first half, Wilt went 2-for-9 against him, and the game was over at half-time with the score 61-37.
Joe, I am glad to hear that your father impressed upon you the greatness of Mickey Mantle. I'm old enough (and being from NY, lucky enough) to have seen him many, many times, including the 1961 season. There may have been some "he's not really that good" feeling about Maris, but he did hit 39 homers and win (undeservedly, IMHO) the MVP in 1960, so teams knew who he was.
But even with 61 HRs, teams rightly preferred pitching to him rather than to the Mick. That really is one of the most telling stats in MLB history, and yes, Mickey really was that good.
@David in NYC: No question, Mantle's ability to hit from either side of plate and with such power was not seen before or since. There is one particular play in the 1960 World Series that few if any would have made and that was his heads-up baserunning in top of 9th inning in 7th game. He avoided getting tagged out in what could have been a game-ending doubleplay. Those who have not seen the play need to. Who else would have had the sense in all of that pressure and in an instant do what he did? Very few if any - maybe Pete Rose...? Those of you a lot younger need to see that play - simply remarkable in hindsight.
ReplyDelete"The Boy who hit 1.000"
ReplyDelete@David in NYC: to be fair, Walt Frazier scored 36 points and had 19 assists in that game 7. So even a Wilt at full force would have had to contest Frazier controlling the game.
ReplyDelete@NMark W --
ReplyDeleteAmazing that you should bring that play up, because of all my memories of the Mick, that is the one tht stands out more than any other. I was 9 (almost 10) at the time, and I thought that was the most amazing thing I had ever seen. Of course, at that age, I didn't have a lot to compare it to.
Now, it's 50+ years later, and I STILL think it is one of the most amazing things I have ever seen. I hope you had a chance to see the MLB Network broadcast of the entire game (thanks to Bing Crosby's collection of old Pirate games that was recently discovered). There was actually an entire segment in the commentary devoted to it; the NYTimes had both an entire column, and Bats blog put up a separate post, on that play alone.
Here's a a link to the blog post; it has links to the other stuff embedded.
http://tinyurl.com/37ywz7t
@Evan Lobell --
Two things about that: one, the game deservedly is remembered as the Willis Reed miraculous recovery, but it it truly unfortunate that that has pretty much wiped out general knowledge of Frazier's game. He was amazing; he said later it was the best game he ever played. In addition to the points and assists, he also had 7 rebounds. He was, objectively, clearly the MVP of the game.
Two, the outcome may or may not have been different if Wilt had not thrown in the towel early on, but he definintely did throw in the towel. I saw the game live (on TV), and you could almost literally feel the air come out of the Lakers' balloon as soon as Reed walked on the court for warmups, and it was just as clear after he made his first (and only) two shots, that Wilt was a beaten man.
I LOVED "The Kid who Batted 1.000" when I was ten.
ReplyDeleteI thought there was a question at to whether Mantle was smart of lucky. It was a very odd play. The Pirates had one of those old 1950's first basemen who could not move or field much. The first basman caught a ground ball shot by Berra down the line and stepped on first. Mantle froze instead of running to second. The first baseman was surprise to see him, and Mantle deeked him and dove safely back to first. The issue is whether Mantle took an unnecessary risk, when he could have just ran to second base, where he would have been out, but the man from third would have scored. I don't think the first baseman looked to throw home. So, if was a weird and important play that seemed to help the Yankees, but then turned out to only be significant because it provided Mazauroski with the chance to hit the home run that became arguably the most famour play in WS history.
ReplyDeleteHi,
ReplyDeleteThis Blog is very nice, I want share on NBA Playoffs 2011 related information
For more details visit “altiusdirectory.com”. Below URL may be useful to you.
http://www.altiusdirectory.com/Sports/nba-playoffs.php
@David in NYC: We are practically the same age. October 13, 1960 was easily the greatest, most happiest days of my young life as I grew up near Pittsburgh- and it remains a highlight for me to this day. I assume the opposite can be said for you given your NYC moniker.
ReplyDeleteYes, I have the Bing Crosby DVD. That made for a fun Christmas, 2010. Bing's wine cellar never produced a better vintage!
@Kansas City: Don't be too disparaging of Rocky Nelson, the Pirates first baseman in 1960 WS Game 7. Yes, Rocky was a bit long in the tooth compared to most of his teammates on that club but thankfully he was at first that day and not the Buccos other firstbaseman....Have you ever heard of the legend of Dr. Strangeglove? ....Dick Stuart would not have even put a glove on Berra's hot grounder!
Wilt never fouled out because, aside from blocking the occasional shot, he never bothered playing defense. He considered his offensive skills to be his contribution to the team, and on defense he just did the minimum. It's why he's not considered the best in the game, and why Russell is generally considered a better player, despite never scoring anything remotely like Wilt.
ReplyDelete@NMark W --
ReplyDeleteSince I was a Yankee fan, I was probably as heartbroken as you were happy. I know I would have been ecstatic if it had been reversed.
And you're right about Rocky Nelson. Stuart probably wouldn't have even touched the ball. Depending on which fielding metrics you use, Dr. Strangeglove is arguably the worst fielding 1B of all time, or even the worst fielder, period. Certainly the worst I've ever seen.
Who is the only player with four body parts in his name?
ReplyDelete^My favorite Tony Armas trivia