Monday, May 16, 2011

The Worst Pitching Performance Ever

The worst pitching performance in the history of baseball began innocently. Vin Mazzaro entered the Kansas City-Cleveland game Monday in the top of the third inning, with his Royals losing 3-0. He had to come into the game early because Royals starter Kyle Davies left in the first inning with a sore shoulder. Reliever Nate Adcock came in, allowed a run in the second, walked the leadoff man in the third.

Thus entered Mazzaro.



The Royals had traded David DeJesus to Oakland for Mazzaro during the off-season. The word from scouts was that Mazzaro had good stuff. The Royals had intended to make Mazzaro their fifth starter, but he did not impress the Royals much during spring training or in his early minor league work. He pitched a little better after that, though, and the Royals brought him up when Bruce Chen got hurt.

In his first inning, he got Travis Hafner to fly out, he struck out Orlando Cabrera and then, after uncorking a wild pitch -- which I only mention to use a favorite verb "uncork" -- he induced Travis Buck into an inning ending groundout.

You never would have guessed from that first inning that Mazzaro was about to make history. But isn't that thing about history? You rarely see it coming. Who saw the Smoot-Hawley Tariff act coming? Point is, Matt LaPorta led off the fourth inning with a single, and then Mazzaro got Jack Hannahan to hit into a fielders choice. Man on first, one out, no runs allowed yet.

Mazzaro walked Michael Brantley. ... Asdrubal Cabrera blooped a single over short to score Hannahan (Run 1). ... Pitching coach Bob McClure went to the mound to calm down Mazzaro. Hey, no big deal. A single, a walk, a bloop, can happen to anyone. ... And the talk may have calmed Mazzaro. He got Shin Soo Choo to fly to center. Yes, it was deep to center. But it was still an out -- there were now two outs with runners on first and third.

And here we go:

A.Cabrera stole second ... Mazzaro walked Carlos Santana to load the bases ... Hafner doubled to clear those bases (Runs 2, 3, 4). ... O. Cabrera singled home Hafner (Run 5). ... Buck hit an infield single. ... Laporta crushed a double into the left field corner (Runs 6, 7). ... Hannahan hit a ground ball single. ... And Michael Brantley homered (Runs 8, 9, 10).

Yep, that's a 10-run inning. Mazzaro struck out A. Cabrera to end the nastiness, but, as the announcers like to say, the damage was done. But, bad as it was to allow 10 runs, it was not HISTORIC damage. Lots of relievers have given up 10 runs in an appearance -- heck, just since 1919, 148 pitchers have done it. Shoot, it wasn't even historic for the Royals: Kansas City's Jimmy Gobble did it less than three years ago. There are some pretty familiar names on the list of relievers who have allowed 10 runs -- Joe Sambito, Calvin Schiraldi, Mel Rojas, Dave LaRoche, Spec Shea, Art Ditmar and so on.

So, no, Vin Mazzaro did not make any real history in the fourth inning in Kansas City, Mo. on Monday night.

But ... then he came out for the fifth inning.

We can speculate all we want why Royals manager Ned Yost sent Mazzaro out there for the fifth inning. He certainly wanted to save some of his other arms in what had become a lost game. He probably wanted to give Mazzaro a chance to get some outs and at least cushion the horror of the night. Maybe he just ticked off.

Whatever, Mazzaro got the first out of the inning getting Choo on another fly out. But then Carlos Santana doubled. ... Travis Hafner walked. .. Again McClure visited the mound, though at this point I'm not sure what there was to say. You would have expected that everyone realized there would be no happy ending, and Mazzaro would have been pulled for his own good.

But no. He stayed. And he gave up an infield single to O. Cabrera, which loaded the bases.

Travis Buck then hit a line drive single to left SO HARD that only one run could score (Run 11). And that, finally, was the last pitch thrown by Vin Mazzaro.

Unfortunately for him, the bases loaded he left out there -- well, as you know, all those runners were his responsibility. Reliever Jeremy Jeffress came into the game, and he could have done Mazzaro a solid by getting a double play and ending the nightmare. He did not. He instead threw a 95-mph fastball that Matt LaPorta scorched off the wall in left field (Runs 12, 13). Man did LaPorta hit that one. The ball didn't have enough lift to be a grand slam, but it was smashed hard enough that it could have gone through the wall. And when Hannahan grounded out to short (Run 14), the night of Vin Mazzaro was officially over.

His line: 2 1/3 innings, 11 hits, 14 runs, all earned, three walks and two strikeouts.

And that's history: No reliever since World War II has allowed 14 runs in a game -- that unlucky soul was the somewhat unfortunately named Les McCrabb, who teammates called "Buster." Heck, no STARTING PITCHER has allowed 14 runs in a game since 1998 when Mike Oquist did the deed, and it has now only happened three times in the last 60 years.

What's more amazing is that nobody in baseball history had ever allowed 14 earned runs in fewer than three innings pitched until Mazzaro did it. True, you could argue that Lefty O'Doul's outing in 1923, when he allowed 16 runs in three innings was worse ... except THIRTEEN of those runs were unearned (That's right: 13 were unearned). It seems pretty clear. Vin Mazzaro -- through a combination of bad luck, bad pitching and bad timing -- had the worst pitching performance in baseball history.

There's no telling what happens to Mazzaro now. It seems unlikely that he will stay in the big leagues. But you never know about the future. Mazzaro should take a little solace knowing that one game, a 20-year-old pitcher gave up 15 hits and 15 runs -- including home runs to a couple of guys named DiMaggio and Gehrig. He walked nine. He threw away a wild pitch. It wasn't good.

That guy was named Bob Feller, and he led the American League in victories the next three years.

Les McCrabb had a different destiny. After his rough game when he gave up 14 runs in four innings, he disappeared from the big leagues for eight years. He managed to show up for the Philadelphia Athletics in 1950, though. He gave up seven hits in an inning. Buster McCrabb pitched a scoreless third of an inning the next time out and retired to Quarryville, PA where he grew mushrooms and lived to be 94 years old. So that's not too bad either.

28 comments:

  1. hey, right down the road from Quarryville.

    poor Vin.

    And watch Cleveland get shut out tomorrow and someone will say, "I wish we could have saved some of those runs from yesterday."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Joe, I can't believe you're moving to a place without a Major League baseball team.

    ReplyDelete
  3. From AP story yesterday:

    "I think if you're a big leaguer, you're a big leaguer, and I don't try to protect guys in the big leagues," the Kansas City manager said Sunday. "I throw them right into the fire and let them go. They're big league players. They've earned their way here."


    "It's not like, 'OK, you've earned your way here, now I've got to protect you while you're here,'" Yost said. "I don't do that. I don't do it for relievers, and I don't do it for position players."

    Guess so

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ken, Joe lived in a place without a Major League team for years when he wrote for the Star.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Man on first, one out, no outs allowed yet."

    Second "outs" should be runs in 5th paragraph.

    I had a similar thought to see if anyone had pitched worse, but I looked for guys that just didn't record any outs. Hank Borowy gave up 9 runs without recording an out in 1951 (his last year, but fortunately not his last appearance). He had been an All-Star in 1944 and finished 6th in MVP voting in 1945. I'd say it's debatably worse than Mazzaro's outing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Luke Hudson (Royals) 8/13/2006 vs. Cleveland:

    0.1 IP 8 H 11 R 10 ER 3 BB 1 SO

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/CLE/CLE200608130.shtml

    ReplyDelete
  7. On the bright side, at least he didn't take the loss.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It should be noted that your hero, Zack Grienke, owner of a fat 6.60 era with Milwaukee, and over whose trade you heavily chided KC, once gave up 11 earned runs in a start. Maybe that should have been a clue into the most overhyped pitcher of the last several years. BTW, there can be no doubt who got the best of that trade so far. Just look at the current stats of all 4 players KC got in return. Where is your story on that Poz?

    ReplyDelete
  9. If I was running the Orioles, I'd be offering the Royals Gonzalez and Gregg for Mazzaro . . . and be convinced I got the better of the deal if it went through.

    — Graphite

    ReplyDelete
  10. The season isn't two months old. That's where his story is.

    ReplyDelete
  11. >that unlucky soul [in 1942] was the somewhat unfortunately named Les McCrabb, who teammates called "Buster."

    Younger readers may have missed the reference to Buster Crabbe, who won a gold medal for swimming in the 1932 Olympics and then went to Hollywood where he starred in the roles of Tarzan, Flash Gordon, Buck Rogers...

    ReplyDelete
  12. @McGoldencrown - Settle down a little bit. Yes he has a 6.60 era, but it's in 3 starts and he missed a lot of time with a rib injury. To call him the most overhyped pitcher is way off base.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm glad we made the trade and am happy with the players we got but be realistic.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I just did a quick calculation of Mazzaro's Game Score for this outing. I got -31. Is this correct? There is a worse Game Score (Harold Emke, BOS vs. NYA (1923), -32) but that was based on a six-inning outing. Just trying to quantify how bad Mazzaro's day was through another means.

    ReplyDelete
  14. If he had started, his Game Score would have been -22.

    The only actual start I can find that is worse, with 3 innings of less, was Johnny Miljus of the Cleveland Indians on 7/25/29 against the Philadelphia A's:

    3 innings, 13 hits, 14 runs (all earned), three walks, no strikeouts, 3 HRs allowed = Game Score of -26.

    It's harder than I would have guessed to have a negative Game Score; there have only been 83 starts of 3 innings or less since 1919 with a negative game score (an average of less than one per season). Some surprising names make the list: Roy Halladay (-7, 4/29/99) and Randy Johnson (-5, 4/10/94) were the biggest surprises to me.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I go to 3 or 4 games a year. I attended last nights debacle along with Jimmy Gobbles 3 years ago. At least that night we got to see the start of Tony Pena Jr's pitching career. I was hoping Hos would get to break out the pitching arm last night to increase his status from Superhero to the "Greek God of Baseball"

    ReplyDelete
  16. Interesting. Yost says he's not here to protect his players, but why did he take Adcock out after just 1.2 innings? Adcock walked the leadoff man in the 3rd and was pulled for Mazzaro. Adcock, it looks like, pitches about once per week. He hadn't pitched since May 11 when he threw 1.2 innings. In 7 previous appearances, he had pitched more than 2 innings 4 times and had twice pitched 3+ innings. But here he is after 1.2 innings and Yost yanks him after a leadoff walk.

    In contrast, he lets Mazzaro throw 2.1 innings allowing 14 runs. That just doesn't make any sense to me, unless he has an ax to grind with Mazzaro. Or something.

    ReplyDelete
  17. On July 29, 2007, starting pitcher Jason Jennings gave up 11 runs in 2/3 of an inning, while posting a -9 Game Score.

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/HOU/HOU200707290.shtml

    I didn't see Mazzaro's effort last night, but I would still grade Jennings' outing below Mazzaro's, simply because no-one here appears to think that Mazzaro wasn't giving full effort, while it was apparent to everyone who watched Jennings that day that Jennings in fact was not.

    As you can see from the questions thrown at Yost, it is expected that a manager will at least have a reason for leaving his pitcher in to give up so many runs, and I have no doubt that the reason Cecil Cooper, Jennings' manager that day, left Jennings in so long was simply because he was pissed at the apathy and the lack of effort being displayed.

    Those who didn't see the game may wish to scoff at what I say about Jennings' pathetic performance. It is a rather serious accusation, I know. And athletes, no matter what you say about them otherwise, usually try. But Jennings did not that day, for reasons known only to him, and I will never forget it.

    So anyway, Mazzaro! Heads up! At least you tried!

    ReplyDelete
  18. If you combine Carl Pavano and Michael Tejera's outings in this June 27, 2003 game against the Red Sox you get 0 IP, 10 H, 11 ER, 1 BB 0 K, for a -15 Game Score. As the starter, Pavano got out with a 14.

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/BOS/BOS200306270.shtml

    ReplyDelete
  19. In fairness to Mazzaro, he was scheduled to start tonight (Tues) and instead had to be thrown into the fire a day early by Yost given the hefty number of innings that the bullpen guys would have had to eat otherwise. Given that it was a 3-0 game at the time, it doesn't seem unreasonable for Yost to think that he could yank Adcock and get 3 or 4 innings out of Mazzaro and kill two birds with one stone - 1. avoid blowing out his short men in the bullpen, 2. still have a chance to win the game. The postscript is that now since obviously Mazzaro can't take the hill for tonight's start, he's been demoted so that the Royals could call up another starter. In some respects, Mazzaro is the classic victim of circumstance.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I don't care whether or not you're trying to protect players or not, you don't send a guy out to start another inning when he's just allowed 10 runs. That's just insanity, and also, it's cruel.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Kudos to the Royals front office on trading DeJesus for this guy. All DDJ was good for was a .300 BA, 10 HR's and slightly above average outfield defense. That's SO BORING. Mazzaro not only contributed to already pitiful Royals folklore, he made MLB history!

    ReplyDelete
  22. If only I had known history was being made, I could have watched the game...

    This is just the Royals finding their level. Anyone with any sense knows the Royals will be in last place by the end of the year. If they played 40 games of .500 ball in July and August know would have noticed or cared. Because it's the beginning of the season, everyone is giddy.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Mr Tony gave Joe a shoutout for this post on PTI!

    ReplyDelete
  24. In a roundabout way, this post illustrates the inherent unfairness of interleague play. I was just noticing that of the two teams who are 1-2 in the NL Central standings, one plays the Royals 6x, the other plays Cleveland 6x.

    When teams in different divisions have differing schedules, that's one thing. But when two teams fighting for one playoff spot have this imbalance, it seems wrong to me.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Next chapter in the Misadventures of KC Royals: Was the Royals 9th inning on Wed May 18 the worst baserunning effort in team/league history? Two runners, each representing the winning run, picked off 1st base. Runners and manager argue that the pitcher was balking, but don't all pickoff victims trot that out?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Congratulations Dan H, for being the 1 Billionth person to make that joke. Way to go. Enjoy your gift card.

    ReplyDelete
  27. JoePo, I truly hope your mention of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was a tip of the cap to "Ferris Beuller's Day Off". If it was, nicely done, sir. Nicely done.

    ReplyDelete